Use of cone beam CT in children and young people in three United Kingdom dental hospitals

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 336-348

  Hidalgo Rivas, Jose Alejandro ^a   Theodorakou, Chrysoula ^b   Carmichael, Fiona ^c   Murray, Brenda ^c   Payne, Martin ^d   Horner, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b CHRISTIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS DENTAL INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^d CHARLES CLIFFORD DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITALS, SPECIAL; HUMANS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937519982     PISSN: 09607439     EISSN: 1365263X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12076     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Horner K. Cone-beam computed tomography: time for an evidence-based approach. Prim Dent J 2013; 2: 22-31.
2. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 265-269.
3. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H et al. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: 127-135.
4. European Commission. Radiation protection 172: evidence based guidelines on cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 2012; http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radiation_protection/doc/publication/172.pdf (accessed 9 July 2013).
5. Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 24-34.
6. Wall B, Haylock R, Jansen J, Hillier M, Hart D, Shrimpton P. Radiation Risks from Medical X-ray Examinations as a Function of the Age and Sex of the Patient. HPA-CRCE-028 Chilton: HPA, 2011.
7. Nervina JM. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics. Aust Dent J 2012; 57(Suppl. 1): 95-102.
8. Suzuki H, Fujimaki S, Chigono T et al. Survey on the using limited area cone beam CT in pediatric dentistry. Japanese J Pediatr Dent 2006; 44: 609-616.
9. UNSCEAR. Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. Volume 1: Sources. Annex D: Medical Radiation Exposures. Vienna: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2000.
10. Dobbyn LM, Morrison JF, Brocklebank LM, Chung LL. A survey of the first 6 years of experience with cone beam CT scanning in a teaching hospital orthodontic department. J Orthod 2013; 40: 14-21.
11. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-271.
12. Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS et al. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 590-597.
13. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 93-102.
14. Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo PM, Heidmann J, Melsen B. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 344-349.
15. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K et al. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol 1010; 2012: 153-160.
16. Smith BR, Park JH, Cederberg RA. An evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography use in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada. J Dent Educ 2011; 75: 98-106.
17. Edwards R, Altalibi M, Flores-Mir C. The frequency and nature of incidental findings in cone-beam computed tomographic scans of the head and neck region: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144: 161-170.
18. Drage N, Rogers S, Greenall C, Playle R. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients. J Orthod 2013; 40: 29-37.
19. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Gröndahl K. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 483-488.
20. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 413-417.
21. Qu XM, Li G, Sanderink GC, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Dose reduction of cone beam CT scanning for the entire oral and maxillofacial regions with thyroid collars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 373-378.