Attitudes toward risk and informed consent for research on medical practices: A cross-sectional survey

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 162, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 690-696

  Cho, Mildred K ^a   Magnus, David ^a   Constantine, Melissa ^b   Lee, Sandra Soo Jin ^a   Kelley, Maureen ^c   Alessi, Stephanie ^a   Korngiebel, Diane ^d   James, Cyan ^d   Kuwana, Ellen ^e   Gallagher, Thomas H ^f   Diekema, Douglas ^e   Capron, Alexander M ^g   Joffe, Steven ^h   Wilfond, Benjamin S ^e  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e SEATTLE CHILDREN S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; CLINICAL MEDICINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL MEDICINE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937511959     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/M15-0166     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Drazen JM, Solomon CG, Greene MF. Informed consent and SUPPORT [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1929-31. [PMID: 23593944] doi:10.1056/NEJMe1304996
2. Hudson KL, Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. In support of SUPPORT-a view from the NIH. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2349-51. [PMID: 23738511] doi:10.1056/NEJMp1306986
3. Macklin R, Shepherd L, Dreger A, Asch A, Baylis F, Brody H, et al. The OHRP and SUPPORT-another view [Letter]. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:e3. [PMID: 23803134] doi:10.1056/NEJMc1308015
4. Magnus D, Caplan AL. Risk, consent, and SUPPORT. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1864-5. [PMID: 23597408] doi:10.1056/NEJMp1305086
5. Wilfond BS, Magnus D, Antommaria AH, Appelbaum P, Aschner J, Barrington KJ, et al. The OHRP and SUPPORT [Letter]. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:e36. [PMID: 23738513] doi:10.1056/NEJMc 1307008
6. LR Buchanan; Office of Human Research Protections. Human research protections under federalwide assurance (FWA) 5960. Birmingham, AL: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013. Accessed at www.hhs.gov/ohrp/detrm-letrs/YR13/mar13a.pdf on 23 March 2015.
7. Carlo WA, Finer NN, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, Laptook AR, et al; SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1959-69. [PMID: 20472937] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0911781
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Draft guidance on disclosing reasonably foreseeable risks in research evaluating standards of care. Washington, DC: Federal Register; 2014. Accessed at https://federalregister.gov/a/2014-29915 on 23 March 2015.
9. NIH Collaboratory. Demonstration projects 2015. Accessed at www.nihcollaboratory.org/demonstration-projects/Pages/default .aspx on 11 February 2015.
10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Protection of human subjects, 45 C.F.R. § 46.111(a)(2) (2009). Accessed at www .hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/ohrpregulations.pdf on 23 March 2015.
11. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, Kass NE. Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:766-8. [PMID: 24552325] doi:10.1056/NEJMhle1313674
12. Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013;Spec No:S16-27. [PMID: 23315888] doi: 10.1002/hast.134
13. Kass N, Faden R, Tunis S. Addressing low-risk comparative effectiveness research in proposed changes to US federal regulations governing research. JAMA. 2012;307:1589-90. [PMID: 22511685] doi:10.1001/jama.2012.491
14. OHRP and standard-of-care research [Editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2125-6. [PMID: 25390459] doi:10.1056/NEJMe1413296
15. Lantos JD, Spertus JA. The concept of risk in comparativeeffectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2129-30. [PMID: 25390458] doi:10.1056/NEJMhle1413301
16. Magnus D, Wilfond BS. Research on medical practices and the ethics of disclosure. Pediatrics. 2015;135:208-10. [PMID: 25583909] doi:10.1542/peds.2014-3578
17. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Protection of human subjects, 45 C.F.R. § 46.116(d)(1) (2009). Accessed at www .hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/ohrpregulations.pdf on 23 March 2015.
18. Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:229-38. [PMID: 12769135]
19. Research on Medical Practices Research Team. Which medication is best? [video]. Seattle, WA: Institute of Translational Health Science; 2014. Accessed at https://rompethics.iths.org/?page-id=97 on 4 September 2014.
20. Research on Medical Practices Research Team. Approaches to ROMP [video]. Seattle, WA: Institute of Translational Health Science; 2014. Accessed at https://rompethics.iths.org/?page-id=99 on 4 September 2014.
21. Research on Medical Practices Research Team. Informing or asking [video]. Seattle, WA: Institute of Translational Health Science; 2014. Accessed at https://rompethics.iths.org/?page-id=101 on 4 September 2014.
22. Research on Medical Practices Research Team. General population and patient survey. Seattle, WA: Institute of Translational Health Science; 2014. Accessed at https://rompethics.iths.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Patient-Survey.pdf on 4 September 2014.
23. U.S. Census Bureau. Current population survey (CPS). Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau; 2013. Accessed at www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032014/perinc/toc.htm on 11 February 2015.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health Interview Survey: 2012 data release. Hyattsville, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/nhis-2012-data-release.htm on 11 February 2015.
25. Callegaro M, Disogra C. Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008;72:1008-32.
26. Baker R, Blumberg S, Brick JM, Couper MP, Courtwright M, Dennis M, et al. AAPOR report on online panels. Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2010. Accessed at www .aapor.org/AAPORKentico/AAPOR-Main/media/MainSiteFiles/AAPOROnlinePanelsTFReportFinalRevised1.pdf on 1 February 2015.
27. Research!America. Research enterprise survey. Alexandria, VA: Research!America; 2010. Accessed at www.researchamerica.org/uploads/ResearchEnterprisePoll.pdf on 1 November 2014.
28. Damschroder LJ, Pritts JL, Neblo MA, Kalarickal RJ, Creswell JW, Hayward RA. Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64: 223-35. [PMID: 17045717]
29. Hull SC, Sharp RR, Botkin JR, Brown M, Hughes M, Sugarman J, et al. Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8:62-70. [PMID: 19003716] doi:10.1080/15265160802478404
30. Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Bares JM, Jarvik GP, Larson EB, Burke W. Informed Consent in Genome-Scale Research: What Do Prospective Participants Think? AJOB Prim Res. 2012;3:3-11. [PMID: 23493836]
31. Mazor KM, Sabin JE, Goff SL, Smith DH, Rolnick S, Roblin D, et al. Cluster randomized trials to study the comparative effectiveness of therapeutics: stakeholders' concerns and recommendations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:554-61. [PMID: 19402030] doi: 10.1002/pds.1754
32. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Protection of human subjects, 45 C.F.R. § 46.116 (2009). Accessed at www.hhs .gov/ohrp/policy/ohrpregulations.pdf on 23 March 2015.
33. Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Daniel Mullins C, Mishra SI. Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006; 30:24-33. [PMID: 16495020]