Informed Consent in Genome-Scale Research: What Do Prospective Participants Think?

AJOB Primary Research

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 3-11

  Trinidad, Susan Brown ^a   Fullerton, Stephanie M ^a   Bares, Julie M ^a   Jarvik, Gail P ^a   Larson, Eric B ^b   Burke, Wylie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

biobank; genomic research; informed consent; participant views; research ethics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862610725     PISSN: 21507716     EISSN: 21507724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2012.662575     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beskow, L. M., Friedman, J. Y., Hardy, N. C., Lin, L. and Weinfurt, K. P. 2010. Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: Stakeholder perspectives. Genetics in Medicine, 12(9): 567-572.
2. Edwards, K. L., Lemke, A. A.Trinidad, S. B. 2011. Attitudes toward genetic research review: Results from a survey of human genetics researchers. Public Health Genomics, 14(6): 337-345.
3. Greely, H. T. 2007. The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 8: 343-364.
4. Holland, J. and Baker, S. M. 2001. Customer participation in creating site brand loyalty. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4): 34-45.
5. Lemke, A. A., Trinidad, S. B., Edwards, K. L., Starks, H. and Wiesner, G. L. 2010. Attitudes toward genetic research review: Results from a national survey of professionals involved in human subjects protection. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(1): 83-91.
6. Ludman, E. J., Fullerton, S. M.Spangler, L. 2010. Glad you asked: Participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGaP data submission. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3): 9-16.
7. Lunshof, J. E., Chadwick, R., Vorhaus, D. B. and Church, G. M. 2008. From genetic privacy to open consent. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(5): 406-411.
8. Mailman, M. D., Feolo, M.Jin, Y. 2007. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nature Genetics, 39(10): 1181-1186.
9. Mascalzoni, D., Hicks, A., Pramstaller, P. and Wjst, M. 2008. Informed consent in the genomics era. PLoS Med, 5(9): e192
10. Maschke, K. J. 2010. Wanted: Human biospecimens. Hastings Center Report, 40(5): 21-23.
11. McGuire, A. L. and Gibbs, R. A. 2006. No longer de-identified. Science, 312(5772): 370-371.
12. McGuire, A. L., Hamilton, J. A., Lunstroth, R., McCullough, L. B. and Goldman, A. 2008. DNA data sharing: Research participants' perspectives. Genetics in Medicine, 10(1): 46-53.
13. National Institutes of Health. 2003. Final NIH statement on sharing research data,. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/ policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm.
14. National Institutes of Health. 2007. Policy for sharing of data obtained in NIH-supported or conducted genome-wide association studies,. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088.html.
15. Need, A. C. and Goldstein, D. B. 2009. Next generation disparities in human genomics: Concerns and remedies. Trends in Genetics, 25(11): 489-494.
16. Ohm, P. 2010. Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 57(6): 1701-1777.
17. Rothstein, M. A. 2010. Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research?. American Journal of Bioethics, 10(9): 3-11.
18. Simon, C. M., L'Heureux, J.Murray, J. C. 2011. Active choice but not too active: Public perspectives on biobank consent models. Genetics in Medicine, 13(9): 821-831.
19. Sterling, R., Henderson, G. E. and Corbie-Smith, G. 2006. Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: A review of the literature. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11): 1971-1978.
20. Thorn, C. F., Klein, T. E. and Altman, R. B. 2010. Pharmacogenomics and bioinformatics: PharmGKB. Pharmacogenomics, 11(4): 501-505.
21. Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Bares, J. M., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B. and Burke, W. 2010. Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants. Genetics in Medicine, 12(8): 486-495.
22. Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Ludman, E. J., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B. and Burke, W. 2011. Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: The growing gulf. Science, 331(6015): 287-288.
23. Wendler, D. and Emanuel, E. 2002. The debate over research on stored biological samples: What do sources think?. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(13): 1457-1462.