Addressing low-risk comparative effectiveness research in proposed changes to US federal regulations governing research

JAMA

Volumn 307, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 1589-1590

  Kass, Nancy ^a   Faden, Ruth ^b   Tunis, Sean ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Center for Medical Technology Policy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84859837773     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.491     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Department of Health and Human Services. Human Subjects Research Protections: Enhancing Protections for Research Subjects and Reducing Burden, Delay, and Ambiguity for Investigators. US Government Printing Office website. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-07-26/html/2011-18792.htm. Accessed September 30, 2011.
2. Lo B, Barnes M. Protecting research participants while reducing regulatory burdens. JAMA. 2011;306(20):2260-2261.
3. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Developing PCORI's National Priorities for Research and First Research Agenda. PCORI website. http://www.pcori.org/assets/Program-Development-Committee-Report.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2012.
4. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1624-1632. (Pubitemid 37430387)
5. Department of Health and Human Services. Pilot Studies to Develop and Test Novel, Low-Cost Methods for the Conduct of Clinical Trials (R01). National Institutes of Health website. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA- HL-12-019.html. 2011. Accessed September 30, 2011.
6. Federman DD, Hanna KE, Lyman Rodriquez L, eds. Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
7. Truog RD, Robinson W, Randolph A, Morris A. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? N Engl J Med. 1999;340(10):804-807.
8. Largent EA, Joffe S, Miller FG. Can research and care be ethically integrated? Hastings Cent Rep. 2011;41(4):37-46.
9. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, Kass NE. Learning health care systems and justice. Hastings Cent Rep. 2011;41(4):3.
10. Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Support for Primary Care Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs). Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality website. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/pbrn/pbrnfact.htm. 2011. Accessed September 30, 2011.