A comparison of subjective and objective measures of physical activity from the Newcastle 85+ study

Age and Ageing

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 691-694

  Innerd, Paul ^a   Catt, Michael ^a   Collerton, Joanna ^b   Davies, Karen ^b   Trenell, Michael ^b   Kirkwood, Thomas B L ^b   Jagger, Carol ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'aged 80 and over'; Accelerometry; Older people; Physical activity; Questionnaire; Self report

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; AGED; ARTICLE; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SITTING; VERY ELDERLY; WALKING; ACTIMETRY; AGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACTIGRAPHY; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SELF REPORT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED KINGDOM; WALKING;

EID: 84937405225     PISSN: 00020729     EISSN: 14682834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afv062     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bath PA, Morgan K. Customary physical activity and physical health outcomes in later life. Age Ageing 1998; 27 Suppl 3: 29-34.
2. Gulsvik AK et al. Ageing, physical activity and mortality-a 42-year follow-up study. Int J Epidemiol 2012; 41: 521-30.
3. Ainsworth BE. How do I measure physical activity in my patients? Questionnaires and objective methods. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 6-9.
4. Janz KF. Physical activity in epidemiology: moving from questionnaire to objective measurement. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40: 191-2.
5. Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 197-206. discussion 206.
6. Collerton J et al. A comparison of computerized and penciland-paper tasks in assessing cognitive function in communitydwelling older people in the Newcastle 85+ pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 1630-5.
7. Dodds R et al. Physical activity levels across adult life and grip strength in early old age: updating findings from a British birth cohort. Age Ageing 2013; 42: 794-8.
8. Lohne-Seiler H et al. Accelerometer-determined physical activity and self-reported health in a population of older adults (65-85 years): a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 284.
9. Cyarto EV et al. Measurement properties of the CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire in a sample of older Australians. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 319-26.
10. Arnardottir NYet al. Objective measurements of daily physical activity patterns and sedentary behaviour in older adults: age, gene/environment susceptibility-Reykjavik study. Age Ageing 2013; 42: 222-9.
11. van Hees VT et al. A method to compare new and traditional accelerometry data in physical activity monitoring. In World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2010 IEEE International Symposium on a, 2010.
12. Hildebrand M et al. Age-group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist-and hip-worn monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 1570-7.
13. Sabia S et al. Association between questionnaire-and accelerometerassessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 179: 781-90.
14. Hart TL, Ainsworth BE, Tudor-Locke C. Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 449-56.
15. Gabriel KP et al. Convergent validity of a brief self-reported physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 1816-24.
16. Collerton J et al. The Newcastle 85+ study: biological, clinical and psychosocial factors associated with healthy ageing: study protocol. BMC Geriatr 2007; 7: 14.
17. Collerton J et al. Health and disease in 85 year olds: baseline findings from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study. BMJ 2009; 339: b4904.
18. van Hees VT et al. Estimation of daily energy expenditure in pregnant and non-pregnant women using a wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometer. PLoS One 2011; 6: e22922.
19. Esliger DW et al. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1085-93.
20. Zhang S et al. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 742-8.
21. Prince SA et al. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008; 5: 56.
22. Craig CL et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1381-95.
23. Park S et al. Year-long physical activity and metabolic syndrome in older Japanese adults: cross-sectional data from the Nakanojo Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008; 63: 1119-23.
24. Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M. The international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr 2006; 9: 755-62.
25. Hagstromer M et al. Comparison of a subjective and an objective measure of physical activity in a population sample. J Phys Act Health 2010; 7: 541-50.
26. Westerterp KR. Physical activity as determinant of daily energy expenditure. Physiol Behav 2008; 93: 1039-43.
27. van Hees VT et al. Impact of study design on development and evaluation of an activity type classifier. J Appl Physiol 2013; 114: 1042-51.
28. Kingston A et al. Losing the ability in activities of daily living in the oldest old: a hierarchic disability scale from the Newcastle 85+ study. PLoS One 2012; 7: e31665.
29. Ainsworth BE et al. Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report. J Phys Act Health 2012; 9 Suppl 1: S76-84.
30. Gussekloo J et al. Thyroid function, activities of daily living and survival in extreme old age: the 'Leiden 85-plus Study'. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2006; 150: 90-6.