Impact of study design on development and evaluation of an activity-type classifier

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 114, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1042-1051

  Van Hees, Vincent T ^a   Golubic, Rajna ^a   Ekelund, Ulf ^a   Brage, Søren ^a  

^a ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accelerometry; Classification; Monitor; Physical activity

Indexed keywords

ACTIMETRY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TRANSDUCER; WALKING;

ACTIGRAPHY; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TRANSDUCERS; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878568785     PISSN: 87507587     EISSN: 15221601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00984.2012     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allen FR, Ambikairajah E, Lovell NH, Celler BG. Classification of a known sequence of motions and postures from accelerometry data using adapted Gaussian mixture models. Physiol Meas 27:935-951, 2006. (Pubitemid 44339481)
2. Annegarn J, Spruit MA, Uszko-Lencer NH, Vanbelle S, Savelberg HH, Schols AM, Wouters EF, Meijer K. Objective physical activity assessment in patients with chronic organ failure: a validation study of a new single-unit activity monitor. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92:1852-1857 e1851, 2011.
3. Bao L, Intille SS. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In: Pervasive Computing, Second International Conference, PERVASIVE, edited by Ferscha A and Mattern F. Vienna, Austria: Springer, 2004.
4. Besson H, Brage S, Jakes RW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ. Estimating physical activity energy expenditure, sedentary time, and physical activity intensity by self-report in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 91:106-114, 2010.
5. Bonomi AG, Goris AH, Yin B, Westerterp KR. Detection of type, duration, and intensity of physical activity using an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:1770-1777, 2009.
6. Bonomi AG, Plasqui G, Goris AH, Westerterp KR. Improving the assessment of daily energy expenditure by identifying types of physical activity using a single accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 107:655-661, 2009.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Dept. of Labor. American Time Use Survey (Online). http://www.bls.gov/tus/current/household.htm [18 December 2011].
8. Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, Martin CK, Blair SN, Bouchard C. Trends over 5 decades in US occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLos One 6:e19657, 2011.
9. Csizmadi I, Lo Siou G, Friedenreich CM, Owen N, Robson PJ. Hours spent and energy expended in physical activity domains: results from the Tomorrow Project cohort in Alberta, Canada. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8:110, 2011.
10. Esliger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, Catt M, Murray P, Eston RG. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:1085-1093, 2011.
11. Foerster F, Fahrenberg J. Motion pattern and posture: correctly assessed by calibrated accelerometers. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:450-457, 2000.
12. Freedson PS, Lyden K, Kozey-Keadle S, Staudenmayer J. Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting METs and activity type from accelerometer data: validation on an independent sample. J Appl Physiol 111:1804-1812, 2011.
13. Gyllensten IC, Bonomi AG. Identifying types of physical activity with a single accelerometer: evaluating laboratory-trained algorithms in daily life. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58:2656-2663, 2011.
14. Mathie MJ, Coster ACF, Lovell NH, Celler BG. Detection of daily physical activities using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Biol Eng Comput 41:296-301, 2003. (Pubitemid 36705483)
15. Medical Research Council. Epidemiology Unit. Physical Activity Epidemiology (Online). http://www.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/Research/Programmes/ Programme-5/InDepth/index.html [8 August 2012].
16. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113, 1971.
17. Parkka J, Ermes M, Antila K, Van Gils M, Manttari A, Nieminen H. Estimating intensity of physical activity: a comparison of wearable accelerometer and gyro sensors and 3 sensor locations. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007:1511-1514, 2007.
18. Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Raphael C, Freedson PS. Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:1626-1634, 2006. (Pubitemid 44373782)
19. Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LP, Howard D. A comparison of feature extraction methods for the classification of dynamic activities from accelerometer data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:871-879, 2009.
20. Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LP, Howard D, Meijer K, Crompton R. Activity identification using body-mounted sensors-a review of classification techniques. Physiol Meas 30:R1-R33, 2009.
21. Ridgers ND, Salmon J, Ridley K, O'Connell E, Arundell L, Timperio A. Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9:15, 2012.
22. Ruch N, Rumo M, Mader U. Recognition of activities in children by two uniaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol 111:1917-1927, 2011.
23. Statistics Canada. Government of Canada. Overview of the Time Use of Canadians (Online). http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/393062/publication. html [18 December 2011].
24. Statistics Sweden. The Swedish Time Use Survey (Online). http://www.scb.se/Pages/Product-12211.aspx [18 December 2011].
25. Staudenmayer J, Pober D, Crouter SE, Bassett DR, Freedson P. An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 107:1300-1307, 2009.
26. Tudor-Locke C, Leonardi C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. Time spent in physical activity and sedentary behaviors on the working day: the American time use survey. J Occup Environ Med 53:1382-1387, 2011.
27. Van Hees V. The challenge of assessing physical activity in populations. Lancet 380:1555; author reply 1555-1556, 2012.
28. Van Hees VT, Pias M, Taherian S, Brage S, Ekelund U. A method to compare new and traditional accelerometry data in physical activity monitoring. In: 2nd IEEE International WoWMoM Workshop on Interdisciplinary Research on E-Health Services and Systems (IREHSS). Montreal, Canada: 2010, p. 1-6.
29. Wareham NJ, Rennie KL. The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22, Suppl 2:S30-S38, 1998.
30. Zhang K, Werner P, Sun M, Pi-Sunyer FX, Boozer CN. Measurement of human daily physical activity. Obes Res 11:33-40, 2003. (Pubitemid 41137536)
31. Zhang S, Rowlands AV, Murray P, Hurst T. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist worn accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44:742-748, 2012.