Sharing Models and Tools for Processing German Clinical Texts

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 210, Issue , 2015, Pages 734-738

  Hellrich, Johannes ^a   Matthies, Franz ^a   Faessler, Erik ^a   Hahn, Udo ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Germany; Natural Language Processing

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATIC PROCESSING; GERMAN LANGUAGE; GERMANY; LANGUAGE RESOURCES; POS TAGGERS; POS TAGGING; THREE COMPONENT; TOKENIZATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; EVALUATION STUDY; GERMANY; MACHINE LEARNING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NOMENCLATURE; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; SOFTWARE; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE);

GERMANY; MACHINE LEARNING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; TRANSLATING; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84937394981     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-512-8-734     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. C. Friedman, T.C. Rindflesch, M. Corn. Natural language processing: state of the art and prospects for significant progress, a workshop sponsored by the National Library of Medicine. J Biomed Inform, 46(5):765-773, 2013.
2. V.M. Pai, M. Rodgers, R. Conroy, J. Luo, R. Zhou, B. Seto. Workshop on using natural language processing applications for enhancing clinical decision making: An executive summary. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 21(e1):e2-e5, 2014.
3. W.W. Chapman, P.M. Nadkarni, L. Hirschman, L.W. D'Avolio, G.K. Savova, Ö. Uzuner. Overcoming barriers to NLP for clinical text: The role of shared tasks and the need for additional creative solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 18(5):540-543, 2011.
4. G.K. Savova, J.J. Masanz, P.V. Ogren, J. Zheng, S. Sohn, K.C. Kipper-Schuler, C.G. Chute. Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): Architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 17(5):507-513, 2010.
5. M. Skeppstedt, M. Kvist, G.H. Nilsson, H. Dalianis. Automatic recognition of disorders, findings, pharmaceuticals and body structures from clinical text: An annotation and machine learning study. J Biomed Inform, 49:148-158, 2014.
6. V. Laippala, T. Viljanen, A. Airola, J. Kanerva, S. Salanterä, T. Salakoski, F. Ginter. Statistical parsing of varieties of clinical Finnish. Artif Intell Med, 61(3):131-136, 2014.
7. L. Deléger, C. Grouin, P. Zweigenbaum. Extracting medication information from French clinical texts. In MedInfo 2010-Proceedings of the 13th World Congress on Medical Informatics, pages 949-953, Cape Town, South Africa, September 12-15, 2010.
8. Z. Afzal, E. Pons, N. Kang, M.C.J.M. Sturkenboom, M.J. Schuemie, J.A. Kors. ContextD: An algorithm to identify contextual properties of medical terms in a Dutch clinical corpus. BMC Bioinformatics, 15:#373, 2014.
9. U. Hahn, M. Romacker, S. Schulz. medSynDiKATe: A natural language system for the extraction of medical information from findings reports. Int J Med Inform, 67(1-3):63-74, 2002.
10. H.U. Krieger, C. Spurk, H. Uszkoreit, F. Xu, Y. Zhang, F. Müller, T. Tolxdorff. Information extraction from German patient records via hybrid parsing and relation extraction strategies. In LREC 2014-Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 2043-2048, Reykjavik, Iceland, May 26-31, 2014.
11. K. Tomanek, J. Wermter, U. Hahn. A reappraisal of sentence and token splitting for life sciences documents. In MedInfo 2007-Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics, pages 524-528, Brisbane, Australia, August 20-24, 2007.
12. E. Faessler, J. Hellrich, U. Hahn. Disclose models, hide the data: how to make use of confidential corpora without seeing sensitive raw data. In LREC 2014-Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 4230-4237, Reykjavik, Iceland, May 26-31, 2014.
13. U. Hahn, E. Buyko, R. Landefeld, M. Mühlhausen, M. Poprat, K. Tomanek, J. Wermter. An overview of JCoRe, the JULIE Lab UIMA component repository. In Towards Enhanced Interoperability for Large HLT Systems: UIMA for NLP Workshop @ LREC'08, pages 1-7, Marrakech, Morocco, May 31, 2008.
14. J. Wermter, U. Hahn. An annotated German-language medical text corpus as language resource. In LREC 2004-Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, volume 2, pages 473-476, Lisbon, Portugal, May 24-30, 2004.
15. A. Schiller, S. Teufel, C. Stöckert, C. Thielen. Guidelines für das Tagging deutscher Textcorpora mit STTS (kleines und großes Tagset). Technical report, Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart und Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen, 1999.
16. S.M. Meystre, Ó. Ferrández, F.J. Friedlin, B.R. South, S. Shen, M.H. Samore. Text de-identification for privacy protection: A study of its impact on clinical text information content. J Biomed Inform, 50:142-150, 2014.
17. K. Toutanova, D. Klein, C.D. Manning, Y. Singer. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In HLT-NAACL 2003-Proceedings of the 2003 Human Language Technology Conference and the 3rd Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 252-259, Edmonton, Canada, May 27-June 1, 2003.
18. S. Brants, S. Dipper, P. Eisenberg, S. Hansen-Schirra, E. König, W. Lezius, C. Rohrer, G. Smith, H. Uszkoreit. TIGER: linguistic interpretation of a German corpus. Research on Language and Computation, 2(4):597-620, 2004.
19. J.D. Kim, T. Ohta, Y. Tateisi, J. Tsujii. GENIA corpus: A semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics, 19(Suppl 1):i180-i182, 2003.
20. E. Giesbrecht, S. Evert. Part-of-speech tagging: A solved task? An evaluation of POS taggers for the Web as corpus. In WAC5-Proceedings of the 5th 'Web as Corpus' Workshop, pages 27-35, Donostia-San Sebastián, Basque Country, Spain, September 7, 2009.
21. Y. Tsuruoka, J. Tsujii. Bidirectional inference with the easiest-first strategy for tagging sequence data. In HLT/EMNLP 2005-Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 467-474, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, October 6-8, 2005.