Statistical parsing of varieties of clinical Finnish

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 131-136

  Laippala, Veronika ^a   Viljanen, Timo ^a   Airola, Antti ^a   Kanerva, Jenna ^a   Salanterä, Sanna ^a,b   Salakoski, Tapio ^a   Ginter, Filip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SOUTHWEST FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Automatic syntactic analysis; Clinical language variants; Dependency parsing; Domain adaptation; Finnish language; Information extraction; Natural language processing

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SYNTACTICS;

CLINICAL LANGUAGE VARIANTS; DEPENDENCY PARSING; DOMAIN-ADAPTATION; FINNISH; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS;

NURSING;

ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CLINICAL STUDY; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LANGUAGE; LEARNING CURVE; MEDICAL RECORD; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NURSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; FINLAND; HUMAN; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING HOME; PHYSICIAN;

DATA MINING; FINLAND; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LANGUAGE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NURSES; NURSING HOMES; PHYSICIANS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84904304956     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: 18732860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2014.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cogley J., Stokes N., Carthy J., Dunnion J. Analyzing patient records to establish if and when a patient suffered from a medical condition. Proceedings of the 2012 workshop on biomedical natural language processing, BioNLP'12 2012, 38-46. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
2. Jung H., Allen J., Blaylock N., de Beaumont W., Galescu L., Swift M. Building timelines from narrative clinical records: initial results based-on deep natural language understanding. Proceedings of BioNLP 2011 workshop, BioNLP'11 2011, 146-154. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
3. MacKinlay A., Verspoor K. Information extraction from medication prescriptions within drug administration data. The 4th international workshop on health document text mining and information analysis with the focus of cross-language evaluation (LOUHI) 2013, H. Suominen (Ed.).
4. McClosky D., Charniak E., Johnson M. Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation. Proceedings of the 21st international conference on computational linguistics and 44th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL'06) 2006, 337-344. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
5. Gildea D. Corpus variation and parser performance. Empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) 2001.
6. Clegg A., Shepherd A. Evaluating and integrating treebank parsers on a biomedical corpus. Proceedings of ACL's 43rd annual meeting workshop on software 2005, 14-33. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
7. Haverinen K., Ginter F., Laippala V., Salakoski T. Parsing clinical Finnish: experiments with rule-based and statistical dependency parsers. Proceeding of NODALIDA'09 2009, 65-72. Northern European Association for Language Technology (NEALT), Denmark. K. Jokinen, E. Bick (Eds.).
8. Nivre J., Hall J., Nilsson J., Chanev A., Erigit G., Kubler S., et al. MaltParser: a language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering 2007, 13(2):95-135.
9. Rimell L., Clark S. Porting a lexicalized-grammar parser to the biomedical domain. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2000, 42(5):852-865.
10. Burga A., Codina J., Ferraro G., Saggion H., Wanner L. The challenge of syntactic dependency parsing adaptation for the patent domain. Proceedings of ESSLLI - 13 workshop on extrinsic parse improvement (EPI) 2013.
11. McClosky D., Charniak E. Self-training for biomedical parsing. Proceedings of ACL-08, short papers 2008, 101-104. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
12. Foster J., Wagner J., Seddah D., van Genabith J. Adapting WSJ-trained parsers to the British National Corpus using in-domain self-training. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on parsing technologies (IWPT) 2007, 33-35. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
13. Sagae K. Self-training without reranking for parser domain adaptation and its impact on semantic role labeling. Proceedings of the 10th workshop on domain adaptation for natural language processing 2010, 37-44. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
14. Attardi G. Experiments with a multilanguage non-projective dependency parser. Proceedings of the 10th conference on computational natural language learning 2006, 166-170. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
15. Attardi G., Simi M., Zanelli A. Domain adaptation by active learning. Proceedings of EVALITA 2011 2012, 77-85. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. B. Magnini, F. Cutugno, M. Falcone, E. Pianta (Eds.).
16. Lease M., Charniak E. Parsing biomedical literature. Second international joint conference on natural language processing (IJCNLP'05) 2005, 58-69. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
17. Candito M., Anguiano E.H., Seddah D. A word clustering approach to domain adaptation: effective parsing of biomedical texts. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on parsing technologies 2013, 37-42. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
18. Seddah D., Sagot B., Candito M. The Alpage architecture at the SANCL 2012 shared task: robust pre-processing and lexical bridging for user-generated content parsing. Proceedings of SANCL 2012 - first workshop on syntactic analysis of non-canonical languages 2012.
19. Seeker W., Bohnet B., Ovrelid L., Kuhn J. Informed ways of improving data-driven dependency parsing for German. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics (COLING'10) 2010, 1122-1130. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
20. Kwon O.-W., Choi S.-K., Lee K.-Y., Roh Y.-H., Kim Y.-F. Customising an English-Korean machine translation system for patent/technical documents translation. Proceedings of the 2nd Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation 2009, 718-725.
21. Hassel M., Henriksson A., Velupillai S. Something old, something new - applying a pre-trained parsing model to clinical Swedish. Proceedings of NODALIDA 2011, 287-290. Northern European Association for Language Technology (NEALT).
22. Haverinen K., Nyblom J., Viljanen T., Laippala V., Kohonen S., Missilä A., et al. Building the essential resources for Finnish: the Turku dependency treebank. Language Resources and Evaluation 2013, 1-39.
23. Haverinen K., Ginter F., Laippala V., Viljanen T., Salakoski T. Dependency-based propbanking of clinical Finnish. Proceedings of the fourth linguistic annotation workshop (LAW IV) held at ACL2010 2010, 137-141. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
24. de Marneffe M.-C., Manning C. Stanford typed dependencies representation. Proceedings of COLING'08 2008, 1-8. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
25. Haverinen K., Ginter F., Laippala T., Viljanen V., Salakoski T. Dependency annotation of wikipedia: first steps towards a Finnish treebank. Proceedings of the eighth international workshop on treebanks and linguistic theories (TLT'08) 2009, 95-105. M. Passarotti, A. Przepirkowski, S. Raynaud, F. van Eynde (Eds.).
26. Pirinen T. Suomen kielen aarellistilainen automaattinen morfologinen jasennin avoimen lahdekoodin resurssein 2008, University of Helsinki, (Master's thesis).
27. Oya M. Syntactic dependency distance as sentence complexity measure. Proceedings of the 16th conference of pan-Pacific Association of applied linguistics 2011, 313-316.
28. Biber D. Variation across speech and writing 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Laippala V., Danielsson-Ojala R., Aantaa K., Lundgren-Laine H., Salakoski T., Salanterä S. Vocabulary in discharge summaries - the patients' and the nurses' perspective. The 4th international workshop on health document text mining and information analysis with the focus of cross-language evaluation (LOUHI) 2013, H. Suominen (Ed.).
30. Bohnet B. Top accuracy and fast dependency parsing is not a contradiction. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics (COLING'10) 2010, 89-97.
31. Carreras X. Experiments with a higher-order projective dependency parser. Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL, Association for Computational Linguistics 2007, 957-961.
32. Crammer K., Dekel O., Keshet J., Shalev-Shwartz S., Singer Y. Online passive-aggressive algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2006, 7:551-585.