Regionalism in the Eu: Legal organisation of a challenging social phenomenon

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 219-243

  Evans, Andrew ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coupling; Eu law; Partnership; Regions; Sovereignty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937386693     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330220152222     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Agostini, M., 1990. The role of the Italian regions in formulating community policy. The International Spectator, 25(1): 87–96.
2. Aldecoa, F., and Keating, M., 1999. “ Introduction. ”. In Paradiplomacy in Action -- The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments, Edited by: Aldecoa, F., and Keating, M., London: Frank Cass.
3. Anderson, J., 1990. Skeptical Reflections on a Europe of Regions: Britain, Germany, and the ERDF. Journal of Public Policy, 10(4): 417–447.
4. Ansell, C., Parsons, C., and Darden, K., 1997. Dual networks in European regional development policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(3): 347–375.
5. Barnard, N., 1994. “ Decentralized government and subsidiarity. ”. In Decentralization and Transition in the Visegrad, Edited by: Kirchner, E., London: MacMillan.
6. Benz, A., and Eberlein, B., 1998. “ Regions in European governance: the logic of multi-level interaction ”. In EUI Working Paper, Florence: European University Institute. RSC 98/31
7. Berti, G., 1992. Regionalismo Europeo nella prospettiva del trattato di Maastricht. Le Regioni, 20(6): 1203–1216.
8. Biancarelli, J., 1991. La Communauté Européenne et les collectivités locales: une double dialectique complexe. Revue Française d'Administration Publique, 61: 515–527.
9. Bianchi, P., 1991. La Réorientation des politiques structurelles de la CEE. Revue du Marché Commun, 340: 599–603.
10. Bogdanor, V., 1999. Devolution in the United Kingdom, Oxford University Press.
11. Bulmer, S., 2001. “ European policy making under devolution: Britain's new multi-level governance ”. In European Policy Research Unit Paper 1/01
12. Bulmer, S., and Durch, M., 2000. “ Coming to terms with Europe: Europeanisation, Whitehall and the challenge of devolution ”. In Queen's Papers on Europeanisation 9/2000
13. Burrows, N., 1999. “ Relations with the European Union. ”. In A Guide to the Scottish Parliament, Edited by: Hasan, G., London: The Stationery Office.
14. Cerny, P., 1996. Globalization and other stories: the search for a new paradigm for international relations. International Journal, 51(4): 617–637.
15. Christiansen, T., 1999. “ A Region among Regions: the Wider View. ”. In ELiving with the European Union: The Northern Ireland Experience, Edited by: Kennedy, D., London: Longman.
16. Conzelmann, T., 1998. “Europeanization" of regional development policies? ”. In linking the multi-level governance approach with theories of policy learning and policy change European Integration Online Papers, 4/1998
17. Dahl, R., 1998. On Democracy, London: Yale University Press.
18. Dardanelli, P., 2001. The Europeanisation of regionalisation: European Integration and public support for self-government in Scotland 1979/1997 Queen's Papers on Europeanisation, 5/2001
19. Dashwood, A., 1998. States in the European Union. European Law Review, 23(3): 201–216.
20. de Búrca, G., 1999. Reappraising subsidiarity's significance after Amsterdam, Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper, 7/99
21. Duchacek, I., eds. 1988. Perforated Sovereignties and International Relations, New York: Greenwood.
22. Dyson, K., 1988. “ Introduction. ”. In Local Authorities and New Technologies: The European Dimension, Edited by: Dyson, K., London: Croom Helm.
23. European Liaison. 1998. Post-Agreement Northern Ireland and the European Union, Belfast: The Queen's University.
24. Evans, A., 1998. Textbook on EU Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
25. Evans, A., 1998a. European Union decision making, third states and comitology. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 47(1): 257–277.
26. Evans, A., 1999. The EU Structural Funds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Everting, U., 1992. Reflections on the structure of the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 29(5): 1053–1077.
28. Featherstone, K., 2001. The political dynamics of the Vincolo Esterno: the emergence of EMU and the challenge to the European social model. Queen's Papers an Europeanisation.
29. Feldman, D., 1992. Public interest litigation and constitutional theory in comparative perspective. Modern Law Review, 55(1): 44–72.
30. Gellner, E., 1993. “ Nationalisms and the new world order. ”. In Emerging Norms of Justified Intervention, Edited by: Kaysen, C., and Reed, L., Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Science.
31. Gizzi, E., 1989. Il Potere estero regionale. Quademi Regionali, 4(1): 81–93.
32. Grande, E., 1995. “ Das paradox der schache, forschungspolitik und die einflusslogik europäischer politikverflechtung. ”. In Europäische Integration, Edited by: Jachtenfuchs, M., and Kohler-Koch, B., Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
33. Grieco, J., 1990. Cooperation Among Nations, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34. Hessel, B., and Mortelmans, K., 1993. Decentralized government and community law: conflicting institutional developments?. Common Market Law Review, 30(5): 905–937.
35. Hooghe, L., ed. 1996. Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Building Multi-Level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Jeffery, C., 2000. Sub-national mobilization and European integration: does it make any difference?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(1): 1–23.
37. Jones, H., 1998. The National Assembly for Wales and the European Union, Cardiff: Welsh Office.
38. Keating, M., 1995. “ Europeanism and regionalism. ”. In The European Union and the Regions, Edited by: Jones, B., and Keating, M., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Keohane, R., and Nye, J., 1998. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, 2nd Ed, Brown Boston, MA: Little.
40. Kirchner, E., 1998. “ Transnational border cooperation between Germany and the Czech Republic: implications for decentralization and European integration ”. In RSC Working Paper 98/50
41. Kohler-Koch, B., 1996. “ The strength of weakness: the transformation of governance in the EU. ”. In The Future of the Nation State, Edited by: Gustavsson, S., and Lewin, L., Stockholm: Nerius & Santerus.
42. Lagrange, M., 1958. L'Ordre juridique de la CECA vu à travers la jurisprudence de sa cour de justice. Revue de Droit Public et Science Politique, 84(4): 841–852.
43. Landaburu, E., 1990. How to make ill-placed regions fit to compete. European Affairs, 4(1): 97–99.
44. Leicester, G., 1998. “ Devolution and Europe: Britain's double constitutional problem. ”. In Remaking the Union: Devolution and British Politics in the 1990s, Edited by: Elcock, H., and Keating, M., London: Frank Cass.
45. McAleavey, P., 1993. The politics of European regional development policy: the EC Commission's Rechar initiative and the concept of additionality. Regional Politics and Policy, 3(1): 88–107.
46. McAleavy, P., and De Rynck, S., 1997. Regional or Local? The EU's Future Partners in Cohesion Policy, EUI Working Paper RSC 97/55 Florence: European University Institute.
47. Majone, G., 1998. Europe's "Democratic Deficit": the question of standards. European Law Journal, 4(1): 5–28.
48. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., and Blank, K., 1996. European integration from the 1980s: state-centric v. multiplelevel governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3): 341–378.
49. Meehan, E., 2000. Britain's Irish question: Britain's European Question? British-Irish relations in the context of European Union and the Belfast agreement. Review of International Studies, 26(1): 83–97.
50. Moravcsik, A., 1994. “ Why the European community strengthens the state: domestic politics and international cooperation ”. In Harvard Center for European Studies Working, Paper 52
51. Nay, O., 2001. La construction de la négociation en régime d'incertitude, l'exemple des partenariats publics régionaux dans la mise en oeuvre du FSE. Revue internationale de politique comparée, 8(1): 2–20.
52. Neunreither, K., 1993. Subsidiarity as a guiding principle for European community activities. Government and Opposition, 28(2): 206–220.
53. Onida, V., 1991. Il Ruolo delle regioni nel sistema comunitario. Le Regioni, 19(1): 7–18.
54. Papageorgiou, F., and Verney, S., 1993. “ Regional planning and the integrated Mediterranean programmes in Greece. ”. In The Regions and the European Community: The Regional Response to the Single Market in the Underdeveloped Areas, Edited by: Leonardi, R., London: Frank Cass.
55. Peterson, J., 1994. Subsidiarity: a definition to suit any vision. Parliamentary Affairs, 47(1): 116–132.
56. Rivello, R., 1995. Il Ruolo delle regioni nel diritto comunitario e nel diritto internazionale: considerazioni sulla normativa vigente e sui progetti di revisione costituzionale'. Diritto Comunitario e degli Scambi Internazionali, 34(2): 255–308.
57. Sand, I., 1997. “ The changing preconditions of law and politics: multilevel governance and mutually interdependent, reflexive and competing institutions in the EU and the EEA ”. In Arena Working Papers 97/29
58. Scott, A., Peterson, J., and Millar, D., 1994. Subsidiarity: a Europe of the regions v. the British constitution. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(1): 47–68.
59. Scott, A., 2000. “ The role of concordats in the new governance of Britain: taking subsidiarity seriously ”. In Harvard Jean Monnet Paper 9/2000
60. Scott, J., 1995. Development Dilemmas in European Community, Buckingham: Open University Press.
61. Scott, J., 1998. Law, legitimacy and EC governance: prospects for "Partnership”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(2): 175–194.
62. Smith, A., 1997. Studying multi-level governance. Examples from French translations of the structural funds. Public Administration, 75(4): 711–729.
63. Smith, H., 1993. The Power Game, New York: Ballantine.
64. Snyder, F., 1989. Ideologies of competition in European community law. Modern Law Review, 52(2): 149–178.
65. Snyder, F., 1994. “ Soft law and institutional practice in the European community. ”. In The Construction of Europe, Edited by: Martin, S., Deventer: Kluwer.
66. Spiermann, O., 1999. The other side of the story: an unpopular essay on the making of the European community legal order. European Journal of International Law, 4(4): 763–790.
67. Strange, S., 1994. States and Markets, 2nd Ed, London: Pinter.
68. Strassoldo, R., 1992. “ Globalism and localism: theoretical reflections and some evidence. ”. In Globalization and Territorial Identities, Edited by: Mlinar, Z., Aldershot: Avebury.
69. Sunstein, C., 1993. “ Constitutions and democracies: an epilogue. ”. In Constitutions and Democracy, Edited by: Elster, J., and Slagstad, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Sverdrup, U., and Kux, S., 1997. “ Balancing effectiveness and legitimacy in European integration: the Norwegian and the Swiss case ”. In Arena Working Paper 97/31
71. Valle Galvez, A., 1994. La cohesione economica y social como objetivo de la Union Europea. Revista de Instituciones Europeas, 21(3): 341–378.
72. Westlake, M., 1995. The Council of the European Union, London: Cartermill.
73. Wright, A., 2000. “ Scotland and the EU: all bark and no bite. ”. In Scotland: The Challenge of Devolution, Edited by: Wright, A., Aldershot: Ashgate.
74. Zürn, M., 1999. “ The state in the post-national constellation -- societal denationalisation and multi-level governance ”. In Arena Working Paper 35/99