News flash-hume still dead

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 237-247

  Eubank, Lynn ^a   Gregg, Kevin R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937382645     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263102002085     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 115-152). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Armstrong, S., Gleitman, L., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13, 293-308.
3. Baillargeon, R. (1995). Physical reasoning in infancy. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 181-204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3-73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Berko, J. (1958). The child?s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
6. Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Carey, S. (1978). The child as word-learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264-293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, N. (1998, November). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Lecture given at the University of Maryland, College Park. (Graduate School Distinguished Lecture Series).
9. Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45, 225-255.
10. Clark, A. (1993). Associative engines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597-650.
12. Cummins, R. (1991). The role of representation in connectionist explanations of cognitive capacities. In W. Ramsey, S. P. Stich, & W. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Philosophy and connectionist theory (pp. 91-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145-171.
14. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 307-336.
15. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Fodor, J. A. (1998a). Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Fodor, J. A. (1998b). In critical condition: Polemical essays on cognitive science and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Fodor, J. A. (2001). Language, thought, and compositionality. Mind and Language, 16, 1-15.
19. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3-71.
20. Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213-244.
21. Gibson, E. (1992). On the adequacy of the Competition Model. Language, 68, 812-830.
22. Glymour, C. (2000). Bayes nets as psychological models. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 169-197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 197-212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Gopnik, A. (2000). Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: The function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 299-323). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Gopnik, A., & Sobel, D. M. (2000). Detecting blickets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development, 71, 1205-1222.
26. Gordon, P. (1985). Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21, 73-93.
27. Gregg, K. R. (1993). Taking explanation seriously; or, Let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics, 14, 276-294.
28. Gregg, K. R. (2001, October). The state of emergentism in SLA. Plenary address given at the Pacific Rim Second Language Research Forum, Honolulu, HI.
29. Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9, 247-272.
30. Hahn, U., & Nakisa, R. C. (2000). German inflection: Single route or dual route? Cognitive Psychology, 41, 313-360.
31. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning, 25, 125-135.
34. Marcus, G. F. (1998a). Can connectionism save constructivism? Cognition, 66, 153-182.
35. Marcus, G. F. (1998b). Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 243-282.
36. Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.
37. McCarthy, J. (1988). Epistemological challenges for connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 44.
38. Newmeyer, F. J. (1998). Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
40. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.
41. Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1998). Connectionist and statistical approaches to language acquisition: A distributional perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 129-191.
42. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
43. Smolensky, P. (1988). The proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1-74.
44. Smolensky, P. (1999). Grammar-based connectionist approaches to language. Cognitive Science, 23, 589-613.
45. Spelke, E. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 443-447.
46. Sterelny, K. (1990). The representational theory of mind: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
47. Stich, S. P. (1994). The virtues, challenges, and implications of connectionism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45, 1047-1058.
48. Touretzky, D. S., & Hinton, G. E. (1988). A distributed connectionist production system. Cognitive Science, 12, 423-466.
49. Wexler, K. (1991). On the argument from the poverty of the stimulus. In A. Kasher (Ed.), The Chomskyan turn (pp. 252-270). Oxford: Blackwell.