Literacy difficulties and single-case experimental design

Educational Psychology in Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 227-244

  Reason, Rea ^a   Morfidi, Eleni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937334508     PISSN: 02667363     EISSN: 14695839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02667360120072756     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BARLOW, D.H., and HERSEN, M., 1988. Single Case Experimental Design, New York: Pergamon Press.
2. BINDER, C., 1993. Behavioral fluency: a new paradigm. Educational Technology, 33(10): 8–14.
3. BINDER, C., 1996. Behavioral fluency: evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2): 163–197.
4. BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 1999. Report by a Working Party of the Division of Educational and Child Psychology. Dyslexia, Literacy and Psychological Assessment, Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
5. CHIESA, M., and ROBERTSON, A., 2000. Precision teaching and fluency training: making maths easier for pupils and teachers. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16(3): 297–310.
6. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 1994. Code of Practice on the Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs, London: HMSO.
7. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT. 1998. The National Literacy Strategy Framework for Teaching, London: HMSO.
8. ELLIOTT, C.D., SMITH, P., and MCCULLOCH, K., 1996. British Ability Scales II, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
9. FREDERICKSON, N., and FRITH, U., 1998. Identifying dyslexia in bilingual children: a phonological approach with Inner London Sylheti speakers. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 4(3): 119–131.
10. FREDERICKSON, N., FRITH, U., and REASON, R., 1996. Phonological Assessment Battery (phAB), Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
11. FRITH, U., 1999. Paradoxes in the definition of dyslexia. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 5(4): 192–214.
12. GEVA, E., 2000. Issues in the assessment of reading disabilities in L2 children--beliefs and research evidence. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 6(1): 13–28.
13. HOWELL, K.W., and LORSON-HOWELL, K.A., 1990. Fluency in the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3): 20–23.
14. JOHNSON, K.R., and LAYING, T.V.J., 1992. Breaking the structuralist barrier: literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47(11): 1475–1490.
15. JOHNSON, K.R., and LAYING, T.V.J., 1996. On terms and procedures: fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2): 281–288.
16. KAZDIN, A.E., 1982. Single Case Research Designs, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. KESSIGLOU, S., and FARRELL, P., 1995. Whatever happened to precision teaching?. British Journal of Special Education, 22(2): 60–63.
18. LEVEY, B., and BRANWHITE, T., 1987. The Precision Phonics Programme, Stafford: NARE Publications.
19. LINDSLEY, O.R., 1992. Precision teaching: discoveries and effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(1): 51–57.
20. LOVETT, M.W., WARREN-CHAPLIN, P.M., RANSBY, M.J., and BORDEN, S.L., 1990. Training the word recognition skills of reading disabled children: treatment and transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4): 769–780.
21. LYON, G.R., and MOATS, L.C., 1997. Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(6): 578–588.
22. MCCORMICK, S., 1995. “ What is single-subject experimental research? ”. In Single Subject Experimental Research: Applications for Literacy, Edited by: NEUMAN, S.B., and MCCORMICK, S., Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. MORFIDI, E., REASON, R., and HUTCHESON, G., The predictive validity of phonological assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, (submitted)
24. MUNCEY, J., and WILLIAMS, H., 1981. Daily evaluation in the classroom. Special Education: Forward Trends, 8(3): 31–34.
25. NEALE, M.D., WHETTON, C., CASPALL, L., and MCCULLOCH, K., 1997. Neale Analysis of Reading Ability--Revised, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
26. NEUMAN, S.B., and MCCORMICK, S., eds. 1995. Single Subject Experimental Research: Applications for Literacy, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27. NICHOLSON, T., 1997. “ Closing the gap on reading failure: social background, phonemic awareness and learning to read ”. In Foundations of Reading Acquisition and Dyslexia, Edited by: BLACHMAN, B., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. PLAUT, D.C., MCCLELLAND, J.L., SEIDENBERG, M.S., and PATTERSON, K., 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1): 56–115.
29. RAVEN, J.C., 1995. Coloured Progressive Matrices, Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
30. RAYBOULD, E.G., and SOLITY, J.E., 1982. Teaching with precision. Special Education: Forward Trends, 9(2): 9–13.
31. RAYBOULD, E.G., and SOLITY, J.E., 1988. More questions on precision teaching. British Journal of Special Education, 15(2): 59–61.
32. REASON, R., and BOOTE, R., 1994. Helping Children with Reading and Spelling--A Special Needs Manual, London: Routledge.
33. RICHARDS, S.B., TAYLOR, R.L., RAMASAMY, R., and RICHARDS, R.Y., 1999. Single Subject Research: Applications in Educational and Clinical Settings, San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
34. ROBSON, C., 1993. Real World Research, Oxford: Blackwells.
35. ROBSON, C., 2000. Small Scale Evaluation, London: Sage.
36. SHARE, D.L., and STANOVICH, K.E., 1995. Cognitive processes in early reading development: accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1(1): 1–57.
37. SHAYWITZ, B.A., and SHAYWITZ, S.E., 1994. “ Measuring and analyzing change ”. In Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues, Edited by: LYON, G.R., Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing.
38. SOLITY, J.E., and BULL, S., 1987. Special Needs: Bridging the Curriculum Gap, Buckingham: Open University Press.
39. STUART, M., 1999. Getting ready for reading: early phoneme awareness and phonics teaching improves reading and spelling in inner-city second language learners. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69: 587–605.
40. VELLUTINO, F.R., SCANLON, D., SIPAY, E.R., SMALL, S.G., PRATT, A., COHEN, R., and DENCKLA, M.B., 1996. Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4): 601–638.
41. VELLUTINO, F.R., SCANLON, D., and TANZMAN, M.S., 1998. The case for early intervention in diagnosing specific reading disability. Journal of School Psychology, 36(4): 367–397.
42. WILSON, J., 1997. Phonological Awareness Training (pAT): Level 1, Buckinghamshire: Educational Psychology Service.
43. WILSON, J., and FREDERICKSON, N., 1995. Phonological awareness training: an evaluation. Educational and Child Psychology, 12(1): 68–79.
44. WOODS, K., 2000. Precision teaching probes: lists or text/sentences? Presentation at the Annual Course of the Division of Educational and Child Psychology, The British Psychological Society. Unpublished work
45. YIN, R.K., 1994. Case Study Research--Design and Methods, London: Sage.