A corpus-based approach to evaluating student translations

Translator

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 183-210

  Bowker, Lynne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937330649     PISSN: 13556509     EISSN: 17570409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13556509.2000.10799065     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bassnett-McGuire, Susan (1991) Translation Studies (Revised edition), London: Routledge.
2. Bowker, Lynne (1999) A Corpus-Based Approach to Evaluating Translations in an Academic Setting, MSc Dissertation, Dublin City University, Ireland.
3. Cao, Deborah (1996) ‘Translation Testing: What Are We Measuring?’, in Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcel Thelen (eds) Translation and Meaning (Part 3), Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht, 525–32.
4. Dollerup, Cay (1994) ‘Systematic Feedback in Translation Teaching’, in Cay Dollerup and Annette Lindegaard (eds) Teaching Translation and Interpreting 2: Insights, Aims, Visions, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–32.
5. Farahzad, Farzaneh (1992) ‘Testing Achievement in Translation Classes’, in Cay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard (eds) Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 271–78.
6. Fraser, Janet (1996) ‘Professional versus Student Behaviour’, in Cay Dollerup and Vibeke Appel (eds) Teaching Translation and Interpreting 3: New Horizons, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 243–50.
7. Hatim, Basil and Ian Mason (1997) The Translator as Communicator, London: Routledge.
8. Hönig, Hans G. (1998) ‘Positions, Power and Practice: Functionalist Approaches and Translation Quality Assessment’, in Christina Schäffner (ed) Translation and Quality, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 6–34.
9. House, Juliane (1981) A Model for Translation Quality Assessment (2nd edition), Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
10. Kussmaul, Paul (1995) Training the Translator, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Larose, Robert (1998) ‘Méthodologie de l’évaluation des traductions’, Meta 43(4): 163–86.
12. Louw, Bill (1993) ‘Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies’, in Mona Baker, Gill Francis and Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds) Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 157–76.
13. Mahn, Gabriela (1987) ‘Foreign Language Proficiency Criteria in Translation’, in Marilyn Gaddis Rose (ed) Translation Excellence: Assessment, Achievement, Maintenance, Binghamton: SUNY, 44–45.
14. Malmkjær, Kirsten (1998) ‘Linguistics in Functionland and Through the Front Door: A Response to Hans G. Hönig’, in Christina Schäffner (ed) Translation and Quality, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 70–74.
15. Manning, Alan (1996) ‘A Classroom-bound Approach to the Meaning of Translation Quality Assessment’, in Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcel Thelen (eds) Translation and Meaning (Part 3), Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht, 541–48.
16. Meyer, Ingrid (1994) ‘Linguistic Strategies and Computer Aids for Knowledge Engineering in Terminology’, Terminology Update 27(4): 6–10.
17. rd edition), Sydney: Prentice Hall.
18. Pearson, Jennifer (1998) ‘Surfing the Internet: Teaching Students to Choose Their Texts Wisely’, Proceedings of Teaching and Language Corpora 98 (Oxford, 24–27 July 1998), 142–45.
19. Pfaffenberger, Bryan (1999) Webster’s New World Dictionary of Computer Terms (7th edition), New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
20. Pym, Anthony (1992) ‘Translation Error Analysis and the Interface with Language Teaching’, in Cay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard (eds) Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 279–88.
21. Rogers, Margaret and Khurshid Ahmad (1994) ‘Computerized Terminology for Translators: The Role of Text’, in M. Brekke, O. Andersen, T. Dahl and J. Myking (eds) Applications and Implications of Current LSP Research, Vol. II, Norway: Fagbokforlaget, 840–51.
22. Sager, Juan C. (1989) ‘Quality and Standards–the Evaluation of Translations’, in Catriona Picken (ed) The Translator’s Handbook (2nd edition), London: Aslib, 91–102.
23. Schäffner, Christina (1998) ‘Parallel Texts in Translation’, in Lynne Bowker, Michael Cronin, Dorothy Kenny and Jennifer Pearson (eds) Unity in Diversity? Current Trends in Translation Studies, Manchester: St. Jerome, 83–90.
24. nd edition), London: HarperCollins Publishers, viii-xi.
25. Snell-Hornby, Mary (1992) ‘The Professional Translator of Tomorrow: Language Specialist or All-Round Expert?’, in Cay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard (eds) Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 9–22.
26. Summers, Della (1996) ‘Computer Lexicography: The Importance of Representativeness in Relation to Frequency’, in Jenny Thomas and Mick Short (eds) Using Corpora for Language Research, London: Longman, 260–66.
27. Teague, Ben (1993) ‘Retooling’ as an Adaptive Skill for Translators’, in Sue Ellen Wright and Leland D. Wright, Jr. (eds) Scientific and Technical Translation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161–72.
28. Williams, Ian A. (1996) ‘A Translator’s Reference Needs: Dictionaries or Parallel Texts?’, Target 8(2): 275–99.
29. Winkler, Gustav (1992) ‘Teaching Technical Translation: An Engineered Approach at Flensburg Polytechnic’, in Cay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard (eds) Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 99–103.
30. WordSmith Tools. Developed by Mike Scott (University of Liverpool) and available from Oxford University Press. (http://www1.oup.co.uk/elt/catalogu/multimed/4589846/4589846.html)
31. Wright, Sue Ellen (1987) ‘Translation Excellence in the Private Sector’, in Marilyn Gaddis Rose (ed) Translation Excellence: Assessment, Achievement, Maintenance, Binghamton: SUNY, 113–24.
32. Wright, Sue Ellen (1993) ‘The Inappropriateness of the Merely Correct: Stylistic Considerations in Scientific and Technical Translation’, in Sue Ellen Wright and Leland D. Wright Jr. (eds) Scientific and Technical Translation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 69–86.