Critical inquiry and use as action

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2000, Issue 88, 2000, Pages 55-69

  Rossman, Gretchen B ^a   Rallis, Sharon F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937320373     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1191     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bickman, L., (ed.). New Directions for Evaluation: Advancements in Program Theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
2. Bohm, D., On Dialogue.Ojai, California: David Bohm Seminars, 1990.
3. Bredo, E., and Feinberg, W., The Critical Approach to Social and Educational Research: Knowledge and Values in Social Educational Research.Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982.
4. Brown, L. (ed.).The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary.Vols. 1 and 2. Oxford, England: Clarendon, 1993.
5. Caine, R. N., and Caine, G., Education on the Edge of Possibility.Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1997.
6. Chen, H. T., Theory-Driven Evaluations.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1990.
7. Cooperrider, D. L., and Srivastva, S., “Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life.“Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1987, 1, 129-169.
8. Cousins, J. B., and Earl, L. M., “The Case for Participatory Evaluation: Theory, Research, Practice.“In J. B.Cousinsand L. M.Earl (eds.), Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies in Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning.Bristol, Pa.: Falmer Press, 1995.
9. Cronbach, L. J., and Associates.Toward Reform of Program Evaluation: Aims, Methods, and Institutional Arrangements.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
10. Einstein, A., and Infeld, L., The Evolution of Physics.New York: Simon & Schuster, 1938.
11. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., and Wandersman, A. (eds.).Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1996.
12. Fischer, K. W., and Granott, N., “Beyond One Dimensional Change: Parallel, Concurrent, Socially Distributed Processes in Learning and Development.“Human Development, 1995, 38, 302-314.
13. Freire, P., Pedagogy and the Opressed.New York: Seabury, 1970.
14. Gibbons, M., and others.The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamic of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1994.
15. Greene, J. C., “Challenges in Practicing Deliberative Democratic Evaluation.“In K. E. Ryan., and L. DeStefano., (eds.), Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 85. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
16. Habermas, J., Communication and the Evolution of Society.Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.
17. Hammond, S. A., The Thin Book of Appreciative Inquiry.Piano, Tex.: Thin Book Company, 1996.
18. Hammond, S. A., and Royal, C. (eds.).Lessons from the Field: Applying Appreciative Inquiry.Plano, Tex.: Practical Press, 1998.
19. hooks, b., Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom.New York: Routledge, 1994.
20. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation.The Program Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Evaluations of Educational Programs.(2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1994.
21. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1984.
22. Patton, M. Q., Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text.(3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
23. Presidential Task Force in Education of the American Psychological Association.Learner-Centered Psychological Principles.Denver, Colo.: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory, 1993.
24. Preskill, H., and Torres, R. T., Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1999.
25. Rallis, S. F., “Evaluating an Old Friend: One Evaluator’s View of the Challenging Role of Program Evaluator in Chapter 1.“Evaluation Practice, 1988, 9(2) pp. 25-30.
26. Rallis, S. F., and Rossman, G. B., “Dialogue for Learning: Evaluator as Critical Friend.“In R. K. Hopson., (ed.), How and Why Language Matters in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, no. 86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000a.
27. Rallis, S. F., and Rossman, G. B., “Communicating Quality and Qualities: The Role of the Evaluator as Critical Friend.“In R. E.Stake (ed.), Advances in Program Evaluation: Exploring the Discernment of Quality.Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 2000b.
28. Rossman, G. B., Rallis, S. F., Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1998.
29. Schön, D., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.New York: Basic Books, 1983.
30. Senge, P., The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization.New York: Doubleday, 1990.
31. Stake, R. E., “Retrospective on ‘The Countenance of Educational Evaluation.'“In M. W.McLaughlinand D. C.Phillips (eds.), Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century.90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
32. 21st Century Learning Initiative.“A Policy Paper: The Strategic and Resource Implications of a New Model of Learning.”[http://www.21learn.org/publ/PP.pdf.]. Nov. 1998.
33. Stringer, E., T., Action Research: A Handbook for Practitioners.2nd Editon. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1999.
34. 21st Century Learning Initiative.“The 21st Century Learning Initiative: Promoting a Vision, Knowledge, Experience and a Network.”7[http://www.21learn.org.]. June 2000.
35. Vella, J., Learning to Listen, Learning to Teach: The Power of Dialogue in Educating Adults.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
36. Vygotsky, L. S., Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.
37. Weiss, C. H., “Improving the Linkage Between Social Research and Public Policy.“In L. E.Lynn (ed.), Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection. Study Project on Social Research and Development.Vol. 5.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1978.
38. Weiss, C. H., “Improving the Use of Evaluations: Whose Job Is It Anyway?" In A. J.Reynolds and H. J.Walberg (eds.), Advances in Educational Productivity: Evaluation Research for Educational Productivity.Vol. 7. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1998.
39. Wertheimer, M., Productive Thinking.New York: HarperCollins, 1945.