Diagnostic performance and dose comparison of filtered back projection and adaptive iterative dose reduction three-dimensional CT enterography in children and young adults

Radiology

Volumn 276, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 233-242

  Wallihan, Daniel B ^a   Podberesky, Daniel J ^a,b   Sullivan, John ^a,c   Denson, Lee A ^a   Zhang, Bin ^a   Salisbury, Shelia R ^a   Towbin, Alexander J ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEMOURS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ITERATIVE DOSE REDUCTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ENTEROGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASE ASSESSMENT; DOSIMETRY; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; ILEAL INFLAMMATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES; MALE; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937060827     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140468     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Duigenan S, Gee MS. Imaging of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(4):907-915.
2. Bruining DH, Siddiki HA, Fletcher JG, et al. Benefit of computed tomography enterography in Crohn's disease: effects on patient management and physician level of confidence. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012;18(2):219-225.
3. Swanson G, Behara R, Braun R, Keshavarzian A. Diagnostic medical radiation in inflammatory bowel disease: how to limit risk and maximize benefit. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19(11):2501-2508.
4. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003;112(4):951-957.
5. Levesque BG, Cipriano LE, Chang SL, Lee KK, Owens DK, Garber AM. Cost effectiveness of alternative imaging strategies for the diagnosis of small-bowel Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8(3):261-267, e1-e4.
6. Sauer CG, Kugathasan S, Martin DR, Applegate KE. Medical radiation exposure in children with inflammatory bowel disease estimates high cumulative doses. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17(11):2326-2332.
7. Gervaise A, Osemont B, Louis M, Lecocq S, Teixeira P, Blum A. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D. Diagn Interv Imaging 2014;95(1):47-53.
8. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(3):764-771.
9. Ohno Y, Takenaka D, Kanda T, et al. Adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing for reduced- and low-dose pulmonary CT: comparison with standard-dose CT for image noise reduction and radiological findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(4):W477-W485.
10. Joemai RM, Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Hernandez-Giron I, Geleijns J. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201(6):1291-1297.
11. Wallihan DB, Towbin AJ, Denson LA, Salisbury S, Podberesky DJ. Inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents: assessing the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of magnetic resonance enterography compared to histopathology. Acad Radiol 2012;19(7):819-826.
12. Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD, McCollough CH, McNitt-Gray MF, Toth TL. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park, Md: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2011.
13. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):37-46.
14. Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, Nguyen DD, Kulkarni NM, Sahani DV. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(6):W743-W752.
15. Matsuki M, Murakami T, Juri H, Yoshikawa S, Narumi Y. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection. Acta Radiol 2013;54(8):869-875.
16. Kidoh M, Nakaura T, Nakamura S, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT: comparison of low tube voltage with moderate-level iterative reconstruction and standard tube voltage, low tube current with high-level iterative reconstruction. Clin Radiol 2013;68(10):1008-1015.
17. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Nishibori H, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure in CT of the pancreas: 320-MDCT with and without adaptive iterative dose reduction versus 64-MDCT. Clin Radiol 2013;68(11):e593-e600.
18. Smith EA, Dillman JR, Goodsitt MM, Christodoulou EG, Keshavarzi N, Strouse PJ. Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT. Radiology 2014;270(2):526-534.
19. Volders D, Bols A, Haspeslagh M, Coenegrachts K. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Radiology 2013;269(2):469-474.
20. Namimoto T, Oda S, Utsunomiya D, et al. Improvement of image quality at low-radiation dose and low-contrast material dose abdominal CT in patients with cirrhosis: intraindividual comparison of low tube voltage with iterative reconstruction algorithm and standard tube voltage. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36(4):495-501.
21. Johnston JH, Podberesky DJ, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Comparison of radiation dose estimates, image noise, and scan duration in pediatric body imaging for volumetric and helical modes on 320-detector CT and helical mode on 64-detector CT. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43(9):1117-1127.
22. Kaza RK, Platt JF, Al-Hawary MM, Wasnik A, Liu PS, Pandya A. CT enterography at 80 kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus at 120 kVp with standard reconstruction: image quality, diagnostic adequacy, and dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(5):1084-1092.
23. Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, et al. A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(1):50-57.
24. Johnson E, Megibow AJ, Wehrli NE, O'Donnell T, Chandarana H. CT enterography at 100 kVp with iterative reconstruction compared to 120 kVp filtered back projection: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in the same patients. Abdom Imaging 2014;39(6):1255-1260.
25. Towbin AJ, Sullivan J, Denson LA, Wallihan DB, Podberesky DJ. CT and MR enterography in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. RadioGraphics 2013;33(7):1843-1860.
26. Quencer KB, Nimkin K, Mino-Kenudson M, Gee MS. Detecting active inflammation and fibrosis in pediatric Crohn's disease: prospective evaluation of MR-E and CT-E. Abdom Imaging 2013;38(4):705-713.
27. Gee MS, Nimkin K, Hsu M, et al. Prospective evaluation of MR enterography as the primary imaging modality for pediatric Crohn disease assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(1):224-231.
28. Brenner DJ. Should computed tomography be the modality of choice for imaging Crohn's disease in children? The radiation risk perspective. Gut 2008;57(11):1489-1490.
29. Masselli G, Gualdi G. CT and MR enterography in evaluating small bowel diseases: when to use which modality? Abdom Imaging 2013;38(2):249-259.
30. Jensen MD, Ormstrup T, Vagn-Hansen C, Østergaard L, Rafaelsen SR. Interobserver and intermodality agreement for detection of small bowel Crohn's disease with MR enterography and CT enterography. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17(5):1081-1088.
31. Grand DJ, Beland MD, Machan JT, Mayo-Smith WW. Detection of Crohn's disease: Comparison of CT and MR enterography without anti-peristaltic agents performed on the same day. Eur J Radiol 2012;81(8):1735-1741.