Coercivity of combined boundary integral equations high-frequency scattering

Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics

Volumn 68, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1587-1639

  Spence, Euan A ^a   Kamotski, Ilia V ^b   Smyshlyaev, Valery P ^b  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937053211     PISSN: 00103640     EISSN: 10970312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.21543     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Babuška, I. M.; Sauter, S. A. Is the pollution effect of the FEM avoidable for the Helmholtz equation considering high wave numbers? Reprint of SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997), no. 6, 2392-2423. SIAM Rev. 42 (2000), no. 3, 451-484 (electronic). doi: 10.1137/S0036142994269186
2. Beckermann, B.; Goreinov, S. A.; Tyrtyshnikov, E. E. Some remarks on the Elman estimate for GMRES. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 27 (2005), no. 3, 772-778. doi: 10.1137/040618849
3. Betcke, T.; Chandler-Wilde, S. N.; Graham, I. G.; Langdon, S.; Lindner, M. Condition number estimates for combined potential boundary integral operators in acoustics and their boundary element discretisation. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 27 (2011), no. 1, 31-69.
4. Betcke, T.; Phillips, J.; Spence, E. A. Spectral decompositions and non-normality of boundary integral operators in acoustic scattering. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 34 (2014), no. 2, 700-731. doi: 10.1093/imanum/drt002
5. Betcke, T.; Spence, E. A. Numerical estimation of coercivity constants for boundary integral operators in acoustic scattering. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 49 (2011), no. 4, 1572-1601. doi: 10.1137/100788483
6. Boubendir, Y.; Turc, C. Wave-number estimates for regularized combined field boundary integral operators in acoustic scattering problems with Neumann boundary conditions. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 33 (2013), no. 4, 1176-1225. doi: 10.1093/imanum/drs038
7. Bruno, O.; Elling, T.; Turc, C. Regularized integral equations and fast high-order solvers for sound-hard acoustic scattering problems. Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 91 (2012), no. 10, 1045-1072. doi: 10.1002/nme.4302
8. Caffarelli, L. A.; Friedman, A. The free boundary for elastic-plastic torsion problems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 252 (1979), 65-97. doi: 10.2307/1998078
9. Chandler-Wilde, S. N.; Graham, I. G.; Langdon, S.; Lindner, M. Condition number estimates for combined potential boundary integral operators in acoustic scattering. J. Integral Equations Appl. 21 (2009), no. 2, 229-279. doi: 10.1216/JIE-2009-21-2-229
10. Chandler-Wilde, S. N.; Graham, I. G.; Langdon, S.; Spence, E. A. Numerical-asymptotic boundary integral methods in high-frequency acoustic scattering. Acta Numer. 21 (2012), 89-305.
11. Chandler-Wilde, S. N.; Monk, P. Wave-number-explicit bounds in time-harmonic scattering. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39 (2008), no. 5, 1428-1455. doi: 10.1137/060662575
12. Chandler-Wilde, S. N.; Spence, E. A. Coercive modifications of the double-layer potential operator on Lipschitz domains. In preparation.
13. Chazal, F..; Soufflet, R. Stability and finiteness properties of medial axis and skeleton. J. Dynam. Control Systems 10 (2004), no. 2, 149-170. doi: 10.1023/B:JODS.0000024119.38784.ff
14. Choi, H. I.; Choi, S. W.; Moon, H. P. Mathematical theory of medial axis transform. Pacific J. Math. 181 (1997), no. 1, 57-88. doi: 10.2140/pjm.1997.181.57
15. Colton, D. L.; Kress, R. Integral equation methods in scattering theory. Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). A Wiley-Interscience Publication. Wiley, New York, 1983.
16. Costabel, M. Boundary integral operators on Lipschitz domains: elementary results. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 19 (1988), no. 3, 613-626. doi: 10.1137/0519043
17. Costabel, M. Some historical remarks on the positivity of boundary integral operators. Boundary element analysis, 1-27. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, 29. Springer, Berlin, 2007. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-47533-0_1
18. Cummings, P.; Feng, X. Sharp regularity coefficient estimates for complex-valued acoustic and elastic Helmholtz equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 16 (2006), no. 1, 139-160. doi: 10.1142/S021820250600108X
19. Domínguez, V.; Graham, I. G.; Smyshlyaev, V. P. A hybrid numerical-asymptotic boundary integral method for high-frequency acoustic scattering. Numer. Math. 106 (2007), no. 3, 471-510. doi: 10.1007/s00211-007-0071-4
20. Eisenstat, S. C.; Elman, H. C.; Schultz, M. H. Variational iterative methods for nonsymmetric systems of linear equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20 (1983), no. 2, 345-357. doi: 10.1137/0720023
21. Elman, H. C. Iterative methods for sparse nonsymmetric systems of linear equations. Thesis, Yale University, 1982.
22. Esterhazy, S.; Melenk, J. M. On stability of discretizations of the Helmholtz equation. Numerical analysis of multiscale problems, 285-324. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, 83. Springer, Heidelberg, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22061-6_9
23. Evans, L. C. Partial differential equations. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 19. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1998.
24. Evans, W. D.; Harris, D. J. Sobolev embeddings for generalized ridged domains. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 54 (1987), no. 1, 141-175. doi: 10.1112/plms/s3-54.1.141
25. Foote, R. L. Regularity of the distance function. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 92 (1984), no. 1, 153-155. doi: 10.2307/2045171
26. Ganesh, M.; Hawkins, S. C. A fully discrete Galerkin method for high frequency exterior acoustic scattering in three dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011), no. 1, 104-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.09.014
27. Gilbarg, D.; Trudinger, N. S. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Reprint of the 1998 edition. Classics in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 2001.
28. Graham, I. G.; Löhndorf, M.; Melenk, J. M.; Spence, E. A. When is the error in the h-BEM for solving the Helmholtz equation bounded independently of k? BIT. Numerical Mathematics, to appear.
29. Hetmaniuk, U. Stability estimates for a class of Helmholtz problems. Commun. Math. Sci. 5 (2007), no. 3, 665-678.
30. Hiptmair, R.; Moiola, A.; Perugia, I. Stability results for the time-harmonic Maxwell equations with impedance boundary conditions. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 21 (2011), no. 11, 2263-2287. doi: 10.1142/S021820251100574X
31. Hsiao, G. C.; Wendland, W. L. A finite element method for some integral equations of the first kind. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 58 (1977), no. 3, 449-481. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(77)90186-X
32. Hsiao, G. C.; Wendland, W. L. Boundary integral equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 164. Springer, Berlin, 2008. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68545-6
33. Kuznetsov, N.; Maź ya, V. G.; Vainberg, B. R. Linear water waves: a mathematical approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
34. Le Roux, M. N. Équations intégrales pour le probléme du potentiel électrique dans le plan. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A 278 (1974), 541-544.
35. Li, Y. Y.; Nirenberg, L. The distance function to the boundary, Finsler geometry, and the singular set of viscosity solutions of some Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 58 (2005), no. 1, 85-146. doi: 10.1002/cpa.20051
36. n has the same homotopy type as its medial axis. Computer-Aided Design 36 (2004), no. 11, 1029-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2004.01.011
37. Mantegazza, C.; Mennucci, A. C. Hamilton-Jacobi equations and distance functions on Riemannian manifolds. Appl. Math. Optim. 47 (2003), no. 1, 1-25. doi: 10.1007/s00245-002-0736-4
38. Marburg, S. Six boundary elements per wavelength: is that enough? J. Comp. Acous. 10 (2002), no. 01, 25-51. doi: 10.1142/S0218396X02001401
39. Maź ya, V. G. On the steady problem of small oscillations of a fluid in the presence of a submerged body. Proc. Semin. Sobolev 2 (1977), 57-79.
40. McLean, W. Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
41. Melenk, J. M. On generalized finite element methods. Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, 1995.
42. Melrose, R. B.; Taylor, M. E. Near peak scattering and the corrected Kirchhoff approximation for a convex obstacle. Adv. in Math. 55 (1985), no. 3, 242-315. doi: 10.1016/0001-8708(85)90093-3
43. Moiola, A. Trefftz-discontinuous Galerkin methods for time-harmonic wave problems. Thesis, ETH Zürich, 2011.
44. Moiola, A.; Spence, E. A. Is the Helmholtz equation really sign-indefinite? SIAM Rev. 56 (2014), no. 2, 274-312. doi: 10.1137/120901301
45. Morawetz, C. S. The decay of solutions of the exterior initial-boundary value problem for the wave equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 14 (1961), no. 3, 561-568. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160140327
46. Morawetz, C. S. Decay for solutions of the exterior problem for the wave equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 28 (1975), no. 2, 229-264. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160280204
47. Morawetz, C. S.; Ludwig, D. An inequality for the reduced wave operator and the justification of geometrical optics. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 21 (1968), no. 2, 187-203. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160210206
48. Morawetz, C. S.; Ralston, J. V.; Strauss, W. A. Decay of solutions of the wave equation outside nontrapping obstacles. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 30 (1977), no. 4, 447-508. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160300405
49. Nečas, J. Les méthodes directes en théorie des équations elliptiques. Masson et Cie, Éditeurs, Paris; Academia, Éditeurs, Prague (1967), 351 pp.
50. Nédélec, J. C. Acoustic and electromagnetic equations. Integral representations for harmonic problems. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 144. Springer, New York, 2001.
51. 3. Rev. Française Automat. Informat. Recherche Opérationnelle Sér. Rouge 7 (1973), no. R-3, 105-129.
52. Rellich, F. Darstellung der Eigenwerte von Δ u+λ u = 0 durch ein Randintegral. Math. Z. 46 (1940), 635-636. doi: 10.1007/BF01181459
53. Riley, K. F.; Hobson, M. P.; Bence, S. J. Mathematical methods for physics and engineering. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
54. Rockafellar, R. T. Convex analysis. Princeton Mathematical Series, 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970.
55. Sauter, S. A.; Schwab, C. Boundary element methods. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 39. Springer, Berlin, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-68093-2
56. Spence, E. A. Bounds on acoustic layer potentials via oscillatory integral techniques. BIT. Numerical Mathematics (2014), doi: 10.1007/s10543-014-0506-0.
57. Spence, E. A. Wavenumber-explicit bounds in time-harmonic acoustic scattering. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 46 (2014), no. 4, 2987-3024. doi: 10.1137/130932855
58. Spence, E. A.; Chandler-Wilde, S. N.; Graham, I. G.; Smyshlyaev, V. P. A new frequency-uniform coercive boundary integral equation for acoustic scattering. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 64 (2011), no. 10, 1384-1415. doi: 10.1002/cpa.20378
59. Steinbach, O. Numerical approximation methods for elliptic boundary value problems. Springer, New York, 2008. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-68805-3
60. Steinbach, O.; Wendland, W. L. On C. Neumann's method for second-order elliptic systems in domains with non-smooth boundaries. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 262 (2001), no. 2, 733-748. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7615
61. Strauss, W. A. Dispersal of waves vanishing on the boundary of an exterior domain. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 28 (1975), no. 2, 265-278. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160280205
62. Trefethen, L. N.; Embree, M. Spectra and pseudospectra. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 2005.