Measurement of plant growth in view of an integrative analysis of regulatory networks

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 25, Issue , 2015, Pages 90-97

  Wuyts, Nathalie ^a,b   Dhondt, Stijn ^a,b   Inzé, Dirk ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

ARABIDOPSIS; ENVIRONMENT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT;

ARABIDOPSIS; ENVIRONMENT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS;

EID: 84936980804     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Sablowski R., Carnier Dornelas M. Interplay between cell growth and cell cycle in plants. J Exp Bot 2014, 65:2703-2714.
2. Polyn S., Willems A., De Veylder L. Cell cycle entry, maintenance, and exit during plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2015, 23:1-7.
3. Nelissen H., Moloney M., Inzé D. Translational research: from pot to plot. Plant Biotechnol J 2014, 12:277-285.
4. Granier C., Vile D. Phenotyping and beyond: modelling the relationships between traits. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014, 18:96-102.
5. El-Soda M., Kruijer W., Malosetti M., Koornneef M., Aarts M.G.M. Quantitative trait loci and candidate genes underlying genotype by environment interaction in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought. Plant Cell Environ 2014, 10.1111/pce.12418.
6. Brown T.B., Cheng R., Sirault X.R.R., Rungrat T., Murray K.D., Trtilek M., Furbank R.T., Badger M., Pogson B.J., Borevitz J.O. TraitCapture: genomic and environment modelling of plant phenomic data. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014, 18:73-79.
7. Parent B., Tardieu F. Can current crop models be used in the phenotyping era for predicting the genetic variability of yield of plants subjected to drought or high temperature?. J Exp Bot 2014, 65:6179-6189.
8. White J.W., Andrade-Sanchez P., Gore M.A., Bronson K.F., Coffelt T.A., Conley M.M., Feldmann K.A., French A.N., Heun J.T., Hunsaker D.J., et al. Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crop Res 2012, 133:101-112.
9. Araus J.L., Cairns J.E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci 2014, 19:52-61.
10. Subramanian R., Spalding E.P., Ferrier N.J. A high throughput robot system for machine vision based plant phenotype studies. Mach Vis Appl 2012, 1-18.
11. Dhondt S., Gonzalez N., Blomme J., De Milde L., Van Daele T., Van Akoleyen D., Storme V., Coppens F., Beemster G.T.S., Inzé D. High-resolution time-resolved imaging of in vitro Arabidopsis rosette growth. Plant J 2014, 80:172-184.
12. Slovak R., Göschl C., Su X., Shimotani K., Shiina T., Busch W. A scalable open-source pipeline for large-scale root phenotyping of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26:2390-2403.
13. Granier C., Aguirrezabal L., Chenu K., Cookson S.J., Dauzat M., Hamard P., Thioux J.-J., Rolland G., Bouchier-Combaud S., Lebaudy A., et al. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol 2006, 169:623-635.
14. Skirycz A., Vandenbroucke K., Clauw P., Maleux K., De Meyer B., Dhondt S., Pucci A., Gonzalez N., Hoeberichts F., Tognetti V.B., et al. Survival and growth of Arabidopsis plants given limited water are not equal. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29:212-214.
15. Tisné S., Serrand Y., Bach L., Gilbault E., Ben Ameur R., Balasse H., Voisin R., Bouchez D., Durand-Tardif M., Guerche P., et al. Phenoscope: an automated large-scale phenotyping platform offering high spatial homogeneity. Plant J 2013, 74:534-544.
16. Lobet G., Draye X., Périlleux C. An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods 2013, 9:38.
17. Pape J.-M., Klukas C. 3-D histogram-based segmentation and leaf detection for rosette plants. Computer Vision-ECCV, 2014, 13th European Conference 2014, Springer. D. Fleet, T. Pajdla, B. Schiele, T. Tuytelaars (Eds.).
18. Paproki A., Sirault X., Berry S., Furbank R., Fripp J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol 2012, 12:63.
19. Pound M.P., French A.P., Murchie E.H., Pridmore T.P. Automated recovery of three-dimensional models of plant shoots from multiple color images. Plant Physiol 2014, 166:1688-1698.
20. Golzarian M.R., Frick R.A., Rajendran K., Berger B., Roy S., Tester M., Lun D.S. Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants. Plant Methods 2011, 7:2.
21. Yang W., Guo Z., Huang C., Duan L., Chen G., Jiang N., Fang W., Feng H., Xie W., Lian X., et al. Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat Commun 2014, 5:5087.
22. Orman-Ligeza B., Parizot B., Gantet P.P., Beeckman T., Bennett M.J., Draye X. Post-embryonic root organogenesis in cereals: branching out from model plants. Trends Plant Sci 2013, 18:459-467.
23. Atkinson J.A., Rasmussen A., Traini R., Voß U., Sturrock C., Mooney S.J., Wells D.M., Bennett M.J. Branching out in roots: uncovering form, function, and regulation. Plant Physiol 2014, 166:538-550.
24. Trachsel S., Kaeppler S.M., Brown K.M., Lynch J.P. Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil 2011, 341:75-87.
25. Bucksch A., Burridge J., York L.M., Das A., Nord E., Weitz J.S., Lynch J.P. Image-based high-throughput field phenotyping of crop roots. Plant Physiol 2014, 166:470-486.
26. Mairhofer S., Zappala S., Tracy S., Sturrock C., Bennett M.J., Mooney S.J., Pridmore T.P. Recovering complete plant root system architectures from soil via X-ray μ-computed tomography. Plant Methods 2013, 9:8.
27. Fernandez R., Das P., Mirabet V., Moscardi E., Traas J., Verdeil J.-L., Malandain G., Godin C. Imaging plant growth in 4D: robust tissue reconstruction and lineaging at cell resolution. Nat Methods 2010, 7:547-553.
28. Dhondt S., Wuyts N., Inzé D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci 2013, 18:428-439.
29. Granier C., Tardieu F. Multi-scale phenotyping of leaf expansion in response to environmental changes: the whole is more than the sum of parts. Plant Cell Environ 2009, 32:1175-1184.
30. Nelissen H., Rymen B., Jikumaru Y., Demuynck K., Van Lijsebettens M., Kamiya Y., Inzé D., Beemster G.T.S. A local maximum in gibberellin levels regulates maize leaf growth by spatial control of cell division. Curr Biol 2012, 22:1183-1187.
31. Walter A., Silk W.K., Schurr U. Environmental effects on spatial and temporal patterns of leaf and root growth. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2009, 60:279-304.
32. Andriankaja M., Dhondt S., De Bodt S., Vanhaeren H., Coppens F., De Milde L., Mühlenbock P., Skirycz A., Gonzalez N., Beemster G.T.S., et al. Exit from proliferation during leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana: a not-so-gradual process. Dev Cell 2012, 22:64-78.
33. Sadok W., Naudin P., Boussuge B., Muller B., Welcker C., Tardieu F. Leaf growth rate per unit thermal time follows QTL-dependent daily patterns in hundreds of maize lines under naturally fluctuating conditions. Plant Cell Environ 2007, 30:135-146.
34. Poiré R., Wiese-Klinkenberg A., Parent B., Mielewczik M., Schurr U., Tardieu F., Walter A. Diel time-courses of leaf growth in monocot and dicot species: endogenous rhythms and temperature effects. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:1751-1759.
35. Pantin F., Simonneau T., Rolland G., Dauzat M., Muller B. Control of leaf expansion: a developmental switch from metabolics to hydraulics. Plant Physiol 2011, 156:803-815.
36. Kölling K., Thalmann M., Müller A., Jenny C., Zeeman S.C. Carbon partitioning in Arabidopsis thaliana is a dynamic process controlled by the plants metabolic status and its circadian clock. Plant Cell Environ 2015, 10.1111/pce.1251.2.
37. Xiong Y., McCormack M., Li L., Hall Q., Xiang C., Sheen J. Glucose-TOR signalling reprograms the transcriptome and activates meristems. Nature 2013, 496:181-186.
38. Krishnakumar V., Choi Y., Beck E., Wu Q., Luo A., Sylvester A., Jackson D., Chan A.P. A maize database resource that captures tissue-specific and subcellular-localized gene expression, via fluorescent tags and confocal imaging (Maize Cell Genomics Database). Plant Cell Physiol 2014, 10.1093/pcp/pcu178.
39. Shani E., Weinstain R., Zhang Y., Castillejo C., Kaiserli E., Chory J., Tsien R.Y., Estelle M. Gibberellins accumulate in the elongating endodermal cells of Arabidopsis root. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:4834-4839.
40. Caldeira C.F., Bosio M., Parent B., Jeanguenin L., Chaumont F., Tardieu F. A hydraulic model is compatible with rapid changes in leaf elongation under fluctuating evaporative demand and soil water status. Plant Physiol 2014, 164:1718-1730.
41. Sanchez A., Shin J., Davis S.J. Abiotic stress and the plant circadian clock. Plant Signal Behav 2011, 6:223-231.
42. Caldeira C.F., Jeanguenin L., Chaumont F., Tardieu F. Circadian rhythms of hydraulic conductance and growth are enhanced by drought and improve plant performance. Nat Commun 2014, 5:5365.
43. Nagano A.J., Sato Y., Mihara M., Antonio B.A., Motoyama R., Itoh H., Nagamura Y., Izawa T. Deciphering and prediction of transcriptome dynamics under fluctuating field conditions. Cell 2012, 151:1358-1369.
44. Tardieu F., Parent B., Caldeira C.F., Welcker C. Genetic and physiological controls of growth under water deficit. Plant Physiol 2014, 164:1628-1635.
45. Dubois M., Skirycz A., Claeys H., Maleux K., Dhondt S., De Bodt S., Vanden Bossche R., De Milde L., Yoshizumi T., Matsui M., et al. ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR6 acts as a central regulator of leaf growth under water-limiting conditions in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2013, 162:319-332.
46. Geng Y., Wu R., Wee C.W., Xie F., Wei X., Chan P.M.Y., Tham C., Duan L., Dinneny J.R. A spatio-temporal understanding of growth regulation during the salt stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:2132-2154.
47. Bonhomme L., Valot B., Tardieu F., Zivy M. Phosphoproteome dynamics upon changes in plant water status reveal early events associated with rapid growth adjustment in maize leaves. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:957-972.
48. Yang L., Xu M., Koo Y., He J., Poethig R.S. Sugar promotes vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana by repressing the expression of MIR156A and MIR156C. eLife 2013, 2:e00260.
49. Yu S., Cao L., Zhou C.-M., Zhang T.-Q., Lian H., Sun Y., Wu J., Huang J., Wang G., Wang J.-W. Sugar is an endogenous cue for juvenile-to-adult phase transition in plants. eLife 2013, 2:e00269.
50. Choi W.-G., Toyota M., Kim S.-H., Hilleary R., Gilroy S. Salt stress-induced Ca2+ waves are associated with rapid, long-distance root-to-shoot signaling in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:6497-6502.
51. Pierik R., Testerink C. The art of being flexible: how to escape from shade, salt, and drought. Plant Physiol 2014, 166:5-22.
52. Casson S.A., Hetherington A.M. Phytochrome B is required for light-mediated systemic control of stomatal development. Curr Biol 2014, 24:1216-1221.
53. Vandeleur R.K., Sullivan W., Athman A., Jordans C., Gilliham M., Kaiser B.N., Tyerman S.D. Rapid shoot-to-root signalling regulates root hydraulic conductance via aquaporins. Plant Cell Environ 2014, 37:520-538.
54. Dinneny J.R. Traversing organizational scales in plant salt-stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014, 23:70-75.
55. Andrés F., Coupland G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13:627-639.
56. Sugano S.S., Shimada T., Imai Y., Okawa K., Tamai A., Mori M., Hara-Nishimura I. Stomagen positively regulates stomatal density in Arabidopsis. Nature 2010, 463:241-244.
57. Kawade K., Horiguchi G., Usami T., Hirai M.Y., Tsukaya H. ANGUSTIFOLIA3 signaling coordinates proliferation between clonally distinct cells in leaves. Curr Biol 2013, 23:788-792.
58. Zhang J.-Y., He S.-B., Li L., Yang H.-Q. Auxin inhibits stomatal development through MONOPTEROS repression of a mobile peptide gene STOMAGEN in mesophyll. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:E3015-E3023.
59. Tiller N., Bock R. The translational apparatus of plastids and its role in plant development. Mol Plant 2014, 7:1105-1120.
60. Vos J., Evers J.B., Buck-Sorlin G.H., Andrieu B., Chelle M., de Visser P.H.B. Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:2101-2115.
61. Zhu J., Andrieu B., Vos J., van der Werf W., Fournier C., Evers J.B. Towards modelling the flexible timing of shoot development: simulation of maize organogenesis based on coordination within and between phytomers. Ann Bot 2014, 114:753-762.
62. Gu J., Yin X., Zhang C., Wang H., Struik P.C. Linking ecophysiological modelling with quantitative genetics to support marker-assisted crop design for improved yields of rice (Oryza sativa) under drought stress. Ann Bot 2014, 114:499-511.
63. Chew Y.H., Wenden B., Flis A., Mengin V., Taylor J., Davey C.L., Tindal C., Thomas H., Ougham H.J., de Reffye P., et al. Multiscale digital Arabidopsis predicts individual organ and whole-organism growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:E4127-E4136.
64. Simons M., Saha R., Amiour N., Kumar A., Guillard L., Clément G., Miquel M., Li Z., Mouille G., Lea P.J., et al. Assessing the metabolic impact of nitrogen availability using a compartmentalized maize leaf genome-scale model. Plant Physiol 2014, 166:1659-1674.
65. Torii K.U. Mix-and-match: ligand-receptor pairs in stomatal development and beyond. Trends Plant Sci 2012, 17:711-719.
66. Dignat G., Welcker C., Sawkins M., Ribaut J.M., Tardieu F. The growths of leaves, shoots, roots and reproductive organs partly share their genetic control in maize plants. Plant Cell Environ 2013, 36:1105-1119.
67. Hepworth J., Lenhard M. Regulation of plant lateral-organ growth by modulating cell number and size. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014, 17:36-42.
68. Band L.R., Fozard J.A., Godin C., Jensen O.E., Pridmore T., Bennett M.J., King J.R. Multiscale systems analysis of root growth and development: modeling beyond the network and cellular scales. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3892-3906.
69. Dunbabin V.M., Postma J.A., Schnepf A., Pagès L., Javaux M., Wu L., Leitner D., Chen Y.L., Rengel Z., Diggle A.J. Modelling root-soil interactions using three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 2013, 372:93-124.
70. Fatichi S., Leuzinger S., Körner C. Moving beyond photosynthesis: from carbon source to sink-driven vegetation modeling. New Phytol 2014, 201:1086-1095.