Theoretical investigation of cross flow ultrafiltration by mixed matrix membrane: A case study on fluoride removal

Desalination

Volumn 365, Issue , 2015, Pages 347-354

  Mondal, Sourav ^a   Chatterjee, Somak ^a   De, Sirshendu ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Cross flow; Mixed matrix membrane; Transport; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED ALUMINA; ADSORPTION; ALUMINA; FILTRATION; FLUORINE COMPOUNDS; MEMBRANES; SURFACE DIFFUSION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; CONTAMINATED SOLUTIONS; CROSS FLOWS; CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION; DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS; MIXED MATRIX MEMBRANES; THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS; TRANSPORT;

MICROFILTRATION;

ADSORPTION; FLUORIDE; ISOTHERM; MEMBRANE; THEORETICAL STUDY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 84936953158     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Goh P.S., Ismail A.F., Sanip S.M., Ng B.C., Aziz M. Recent advances of inorganic fillers in mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 81:243-264.
2. Mukherjee R., De S. Adsorptive removal of phenolic compounds using cellulose acetate phthalate-alumina nanoparticle mixed matrix membrane. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 265:8-19.
3. Chatterjee S., De S. Adsorptive removal of fluoride by activated alumina doped cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) mixed matrix membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 125:223-238.
4. Jeazet H.B.T., Staudt C., Janiak C. A method for increasing permeability in O2/N2 separation with mixed-matrix membranes made of water-stable MIL-101 and polysulfone. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48:2140-2142.
5. Zornoza B., Tellez C., Coronas J., Gascon J., Kapteijn F. Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 166:67-78.
6. Aroon M.A., Ismail A.F., Matsuura T., Rahmati M.M.M. Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75:229-242.
7. Galve A., Sieffert D., Staudt C., Ferrando M., Güell C., Téllez C., Coronas J. Combination of ordered mesoporous silica MCM-41 and layered titanosilicate JDF-L1 fillers for 6FDA-based copolyimide mixed matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 431:163-170.
8. Mondal S., Mukherjee R., Chatterjee S., De S. Adsorption-concentration polarization model for ultrafiltration in mixed matrix membrane. AIChE J. 2014, 60:2354-2364.
9. Mukherjee R., De S. Adsorptive removal of phenolic compounds using cellulose acetate phthalate-alumina nanoparticle mixed matrix membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 265:8-19.
10. Matthiasson E. The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1983, 16:23-36.
11. Doshi M.R. Limiting flux in the ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. Reverse Osmosis and Ultrafiltration 1985, vol. 281:209-223. ACS Symposium Series, Washington, DC.
12. Gekas V., Aimar P., Lafaille J.P., Sanchez V. A simulation study of the adsorption-concentration polarization interplay in protein ultrafiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1993, 48:2753-2765.
13. Bevia F.R., Yagues V.G., Sempere J.F., Torres M.J.F. An improved model with time-dependent adsorption for simulating protein ultrafiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52:2343-2352.
14. De S., Bhattacharjee S., Sharma A., Bhattacharya P.K. Generalized integral and similarity solutions of the concentration profiles for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130:99-121.
15. Whitaker S. Flow in porous media I: a theoretical derivation of Darcy's Law. Transp. Porous Media 1986, 1:3-25.
16. Mondal S., Mlouka S.B., Dhahbi M., De S. A physico-chemical model for polyelectrolyte enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 376:142-152.
17. Lagergren S. About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances. Kungl. Svensk. Vet. Akad. Handl. 1898, 24:1-39.
18. Shampine L.F., Reichelt M.W., Kierzenka J.A. Solving Index-1 DAEs in MATLAB and Simulink. SIAM Rev. 1999, 41:538-552.
19. Byrd R.H., Gilbert J.C., Nocedal J. A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Math. Program. 2000, 89:149-185.
20. Mondal S., Chhaya, De S. Modeling of cross flow ultrafiltration of Stevia extract in a rectangular cell. J. Food Eng. 2012, 112:326-337.
21. Ramos R.L., Utrilla J.R., Castillo N.A.M., Polo M.S. Kinetic modeling of fluoride adsorption from aqueous solution onto bone char. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 159:458-467.
22. Qiu H., Lv L., Pan B.-C., Zhang Q.-J., Zhang W.-M., Zhang Q.-X. Critical review in adsorption kinetic models. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 2009, 10:716-724.
23. Mondal S., Mukherjee R., De S. Process modeling for the removal of phenolic compounds from industrial wastewater using a mixed-matrix membrane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54:514-521.
24. Dukhin S.S., Kretzchmar G., Miller B. Dynamics of Adsorption at Liquid Interfaces 1995, Elsevier Science, Netherlands.
25. Chatterjee S., De S. Adsorptive removal of arsenic from groundwater using a novel high flux polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-laterite mixed matrix ultrafiltration membrane. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2015, 10.1039/c4ew00075g.
26. Mukherjee R., De S. Adsorptive removal of nitrate from aqueous solution by polyacrylonitrile-alumina nanoparticle mixed matrix hollow-fiber membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 466:281-292.