Adsorption-concentration polarization model for ultrafiltration in mixed matrix membrane

AIChE Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 2354-2364

  Mondal, Sourav ^a   Mukherjee, Raka ^a   Chatterjee, Somak ^a   De, Sirshendu ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Catechol; Concentration polarization; Fluoride; Mixed matrix membrane; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLARIZATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BOUNDARY LAYER ANALYSIS; CATECHOL; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; FLUORIDE; LOW-MOLECULAR WEIGHT SOLUTES; MIXED MATRIX MEMBRANES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF;

ADSORPTION;

EID: 84899994273     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14420     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ismail AF, Matsuura T, editors. Sustainable Membrane Technology for Energy, Water and Environment. New Jersey: Wiley, 2012.
2. Majeed S, Fierro D, Buhr K, Wind J, Du B, Boschetti-de-Fierro A, Abetz V. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) mixed polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 2012;403-404:101-109.
3. Chung TS, Jiang LY, Lia Y, Kulprathipanja S. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32:483-507.
4. Hoek EMV, Ghosh AK, Huang X, Liong M, Zink JI. Physical-chemical properties, separation performance, and fouling resistance of mixed-matrix ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination. 2011;283:89-99.
5. Tijink MSL, Wester M, Sun J, Saris A, Bolhius-Versteeg LAM, Saiful S, Joles JA, Borneman Z, Wessling M, Stamatialis DF. A novel approach for blood purification: Mixed-matrix membranes combining diffusion and adsorption in one step. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:2279-2287.
6. De S, Bhattacharjee S, Sharma A, Bhattacharya PK. Generalized integral and similarity solutions of the concentration profiles for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci. 1997;130:99-121.
7. Mondal S, Rai C, De S. Identification of fouling mechanism during ultrafiltration of stevia extract. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013;6:931-940.
8. De S, Bhattacharjee S. Flux decline during cross flow membrane filtration of electrolytic solution in presence of charged nano-colloids: a simple electrokinetic model. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;353:530-536.
9. Mondal S, De S. Generalized criteria for identification of fouling mechanism under steady state membrane filtration. J Membr Sci. 2009;344:6-13.
10. Matthiasson E. The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 1983;16:23-36.
11. Doshi MR. Limiting flux in the ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions. In: Sourirajan S, Matsuura T, editors. Reverse Osmosis and Ultrafiltration, Vol. 281. Washington, DC: ACS Symposium series, 1985:209-223.
12. Gekas V, Aimar P, Lafaille JP, Sanchez V. A simulation study of the adsorption-concentration polarization interplay in protein ultrafiltration. Chem Eng Sci. 1993;48:2753-2765.
13. Ruiz-Bevia F, Gomis-Yagues V, Fernandez-Sempere J, Fernfindez-Torres MJ. An improved model with time-dependent adsorption for simulating protein ultrafiltration. Chem Eng Sci. 1997;52:2343-2352.
14. De S, Bhattacharjee S, Sharma A, Bhattacharya PK. Generalized integral and similarity solutions of the concentration profiles for osmotic pressure controlled ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci. 1997;130:99-121.
15. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing, 1998.
16. Mondal S, Mlouka SB, Dhahbi M, De S. A physico-chemical model for polyelectrolyte enhanced ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci. 2011;376:142-152.
17. Vilker VL, Colton CK, Smith KA. The osmotic pressure of concentrated protein solutions: effect of concentration and pH in saline solutions of bovine serum albumin. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1981;79:548-566.
18. Mondal S, Cassano A, Tasselli F, De S. A generalized model for clarification of fruit juice during ultrafiltration under total recycle and batch mode. J Membr Sci. 2012;366:295-303.
19. Shampine LF, Reichelt MW, Kierzenka JA. Solving Index-1 DAEs in MATLAB and Simulink. SIAM Rev. 1999;41:538-552.
20. Mondal S, Chhaya, De S. Prediction of ultrafiltration performance during clarification of stevia extract. J Membr Sci. 2012;396:138-148.
21. Mondal S, Chhaya, De S, Modeling of cross flow ultrafiltration of stevia extract in a rectangular cell. J Food Eng. 2012;112:326-337.
22. Byrd RH, Gilbert JC, Nocedal J. A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Math Program. 2000;89:149-185.
23. Mukherjee R, De S. Adsorptive removal of phenolic compounds using cellulose acetate phthalate-alumina nanoparticle mixed matrix membrane. J Hazard Mater. 2014;265:8-19.
24. Ramos RL, Utrilla JR, Castillo NAM, Polo MS. Kinetic modeling of fluoride adsorption from aqueous solution onto bone char. Chem Eng J. 2010;159:458-467.
25. Choi SK, Scura F, Barbieri G, Mazzei R, Giorno L, Drioli E, Kim JH. Bio-degradation of phenol in wastewater by enzyme-loaded membrane reactor: numerical approach. Membr J. 2009;19:72-82.
26. Chatterjee S, De S. Adsorptive removal of fluoride by activated alumina doped cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) mixed matrix membrane. Sep Purif Technol. In press.
27. Field RW, Aimar P. Ideal limiting fluxes in ultrafiltration: comparison of various theoretical relationships. J Membr Sci. 1993;80:107-115.