A Mirror Therapy-Based Action Observation Protocol to Improve Motor Learning after Stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 509-516

  Harmsen, Wouter J ^a,b   Bussmann, Johannes B J ^a   Selles, Ruud W ^a   Hurkmans, Henri L P ^a   Ribbers, Gerard M ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Erasmus MC University Medical Center and Rijndam Rehabilitation Center Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

action observation; mirror therapy; motor learning; rehabilitation; stroke; upper limbs

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; MIRROR THERAPY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OBSERVATION; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; REHABILITATION CARE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEOTAPE; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARM; CHRONIC DISEASE; LEARNING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STROKE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEORECORDING;

ACCELEROMETRY; ARM; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84936938386     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968314558598     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS,. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke: part i. Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 399-405.
2. Pomeroy V, Aglioti SM, Mark VW,. Neurological principles and rehabilitation of action disorders: rehabilitation interventions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25: 33S-43S.
3. Dohle C, Pullen J, Nakaten A, Kust J, Rietz C, Karbe H,. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 209-217.
4. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L,. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999; 353: 2035-2036.
5. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN,. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: A phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25: 223-233.
6. Dohle C, Pullen J, Nakaten A, Kust J, Rietz C, Karbe H,. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 209-217.
7. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Behrens J, Dohle C,. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Stroke. 2013; 44: e1-e2.
8. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN,. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: A phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25: 223-233.
9. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N,. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 393-398.
10. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Behrens J, Dohle C,. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3): CD008449.
11. Selles RW, Michielsen ME, Bussmann JB,. Effects of a mirror-induced visual illusion on a reaching task in stroke patients: Implications for mirror therapy training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 28: 652-659.
12. Michielsen ME, Smits M, Ribbers GM,. The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: An fmri study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011; 82: 393-398.
13. Bhasin A, Padma Srivastava MV, Kumaran SS, Bhatia R, Mohanty S,. Neural interface of mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurol India. 2012; 60: 570-576.
14. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR,. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fmri study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001; 13: 400-404.
15. Hamzei F, Lappchen CH, Glauche V, Mader I, Rijntjes M, Weiller C,. Functional plasticity induced by mirror training: the mirror as the element connecting both hands to one hemisphere. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26: 484-496.
16. Buccino G, Vogt S, Ritzl A,. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fmri study. Neuron. 2004; 42: 323-334.
17. Vogt S, Buccino G, Wohlschlager AM,. Pre-frontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: effects of practice and expertise. Neuroimage. 2007; 37: 1371-1383.
18. Larssen BC, Ong NT, Hodges NJ,. Watch and learn: seeing is better than doing when acquiring consecutive motor tasks. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e38938.
19. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL,. Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006; 19: 55-63.
20. Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L,. The mirror neuron system: a neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24: 404-412.
21. Pomeroy VM, Clark CA, Miller JS, Baron JC, Markus HS, Tallis RC,. The potential for utilizing the "mirror neurone system" to enhance recovery of the severely affected upper limb early after stroke: a review and hypothesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005; 19: 4-13.
22. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A,. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007; 36 (suppl 2): T164-T173.
23. Cross ES, Hamilton AF, Grafton ST,. Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage. 2006; 31: 1257-1267.
24. Cirstea MC, Levin MF,. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21: 398-411.
25. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S,. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7: 13-31.
26. Badets A, Blandin Y,. Feedback and intention during motor-skill learning: a connection with prospective memory. Psychol Res. 2012; 76: 601-610.
27. Badets A, Blandin Y, Shea CH,. Intention in motor learning through observation. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006; 59: 377-386.
28. Nojima I, Mima T, Koganemaru S, Thabit MN, Fukuyama H, Kawamata T,. Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback. J Neurosci. 2012; 32: 1293-1300.
29. Franceschini M, Ceravolo MG, Agosti M,. Clinical relevance of action observation in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a possible role in recovery of functional dexterity. A randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26: 456-462.
30. Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P,. Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011; 21: 636-644.
31. Dayan E, Cohen LG,. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron. 2011; 72: 443-454.
32. Doyon J, Benali H,. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15: 161-167.