Feedback and intention during motor-skill learning: A connection with prospective memory

Psychological Research

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 601-610

  Badets, Arnaud ^a   Blandin, Yannick ^a  

^a Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MOTOR SKILLS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84865644840     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0365-0     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
2. Andres, M., Olivier, E., & Badets, A. (2008). Action, words and numbers: A motor contribution to semantic processing? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 313-317.
3. Badets, A., & Blandin, Y. (2004). The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 62-70.
4. Badets, A., Blandin, Y., Bouquet, C., & Shea, C. H. (2006a). The intention superiority effect in motor skill performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 491-505.
5. Badets, A., Blandin, Y., & Shea, C. H. (2006b). Intention in motor learning through observation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 377-386.
6. Badets, A., Blandin, Y., Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2006c). Error detection processes during observational learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77, 177-184.
7. Badets, A., Meunier, O., Shea, C. H., & Blandin, Y. (2006d). Effect of self-controlled KR on timing errors and performances' estimation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28, S29.
8. Badets, A., & Pesenti, M. (2008). The effects of intention and practice on a non-motor duration estimation task. Acta Psychologica, 129, 243-248.
9. Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 396-401). London: Wiley.
10. Blandin, Y., Toussaint, L., & Shea, C. H. (2008). Specificity of practice: interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 994-1000.
11. Brandimonte, M. A., & Passolunghi, M. C. (1994). The effect of cue-familiarity, cue distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 565-587.
12. Chen, D. D., Kaufman, D., & Chung, M. W. (2001). Emergent patterns of feedback strategies in performing a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93, 197-204.
13. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408-415.
14. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42-48.
15. Cockburn, J., & Smith, P. T. (1994). Anxiety and errors of prospective memory among elderly people. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 273-282.
16. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 286-290.
17. Eschen, A., Freeman, J., Dietrich, T., Martin, M., Ellis, J., Martin, E., et al. (2007). Motor brain regions are involved in the encoding of delayed intentions: A fMRI study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64, 259-268.
18. Freeman, J. E., & Ellis, J. A. (2003). The representation of delayed intentions: a prospective subject-performed task? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 976-992.
19. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions-persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
20. Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245-256.
21. Guynn, M. J. (2008). Theory of monitoring in prospective memory: Instantiating a retrieval mode and periodic target checking. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 53-76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
23. Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269-279.
24. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Nussbaum, A. (1990). Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks. Memory and Cognition, 18, 568-578.
25. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Bryan, E. S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions. Memory and Cognition, 27, 320-327.
26. Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69-73.
27. Mendenhall, W., & Ramey, M. (1973). Statistics for psychology. North Scituate: Duxbury Press.
28. Salmoni, A., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
29. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
30. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
31. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
32. Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., et al. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 273-281.
33. Watkins, D. (1984). Students' perceptions of factors influencing tertiary learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 3, 33-50.
34. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
35. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 487-494.
36. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In A. M. Williams, N. J. Hodges, M. A. Scott, & M. L. J. Court (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 121-144). London: Routledge.