The tps series of software

Hystrix

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-4

  Rohlf, F James ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Geometric morphometrics; Landmarks; Relative warps; Software; Thin plate spline

Indexed keywords

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84936938125     PISSN: 03941914     EISSN: 18255272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4404/hystrix-26.1-11264     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams D.C., Rohlf F.J., 2000. Ecological character displacement in Plethodon: biomechanical differences found from a geometric morphometric study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 4106-4111.
2. Bastir M., Rosas A., 2004. Geometric morphometrics in paleoanthropology: Mandibular shape variation, allometry, and the Evolution of modern human skull morphology. In: Elewa A.M.T. (Ed.) Morphometrics: Applications in Biology and Paleontology. Springer, Berlin-Wien. 231-241.
3. Bookstein F.L., 1989. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11: 567-585.
4. Bookstein F.L., 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
5. Bookstein F.L., 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1: 225-243.
6. Bookstein F.L., 2015. Integration, Disintegration, and Self-Similarity: Characterizing the Scales of Shape Variation in Landmark Data. Evolutionary Biology (online first). doi: 10.1007/s11692-015-9317-8
7. Bookstein F.L., Connor P.D., Huggins J.E., Barr H.M., Pimentel K.D., Streissguth A.P., 2007. Many infants prenatally exposed to high levels of alcohol show one particular anomaly of the corpus callosum. Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research 31: 868-879.
8. Cardini A., O'Higgins P., 2004. Patterns of morphological evolution in Marmota (Rodentia, Sciuridae): geometric morphometrics of the cranium in the context of marmot phylogeny, ecology and conservation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 385-407.
9. Cardini A., Polly D., Dawson R., Milne N., 2015. Why the Long Face? Kangaroos and Wallabies Follow the Same "Rule" of Cranial Evolutionary Allometry (CREA) as Placentals. Evolutionary Biology 42(2): 169-176. doi:10.1007/s11692-015-9308-9.
10. Chiozzi G., Bardelli G., Ricci M., De Marchi G., Cardini A., 2014. Just another island dwarf? Phenotypic distinctiveness in the poorly known Soemmerring's Gazelle, Nanger soemmerringii (Cetartiodactyla: Bovidae), of Dahlak Kebir Island. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 111: 603-620.
11. Felsenstein J., 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125: 1-15.
12. Gharaibeh W.S., Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E., DeLisi L.E., 2000. A geometric morphometric assessment of change in midline brain structural shape following a first episode of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 48: 398-405.
13. Klingenberg C.P., 2013. Visualizations in geometric morphometrics: how to read and how to make graphs showing shape changes Hystrix 24(1): 15-24. doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-7691
14. Maddison W.P., 1991. Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Systematic Zoology 40: 304-314.
15. Marcus L., Hingst-Zaher E., Zaher H., 2000. Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix 11(1): 27-47. doi:10.4404/ hystrix-11.1-4135
16. Marcus L.F., Bello E., Garcia-Valdecasas A. (Eds.), 1993. Contributions to morphometrics. Monografias, 8. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid.
17. Meloro C., 2012. Mandibular shape correlates of tooth fracture in extant Carnivora: implications to inferring feeding behaviour of Pleistocene predators. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106: 70-80.
18. Pizzo A., Macagno A.L.M., Roggero A., Rolando A., Palestrini C., 2009. Epipharynx shape as a tool to reveal differentiation patterns between insect sister species: insights from Onthophagus taurus and O. illyricus (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Organisms Diversity & Evolution 9: 189-200.
19. Rohlf F.J., 1993. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. In: Marcus L.F., Bello E., Garcia-Valdecasas A. (Eds.) Contributions to morphometrics. Monografias, 8. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. 131-159.
20. Rohlf F.J., 1998. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Systematic Biology 47: 147-158.
21. Rohlf F.J., 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 16: 197-223.
22. Rohlf F.J., 2000a. On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods. Hystrix 11(1): 9-25. doi:10.4404/hystrix-11.1-4134
23. Rohlf F.J., 2000b. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 111: 463-478.
24. Rohlf F.J., 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 2143-2160.
25. Rohlf F.J., 2002. Geometric morphometrics and phylogeny. In: MacLeod N., Forey P.L. (Eds.) Morphology, shape and phylogenetics. Taylor & Francis, London. 175-193.
26. Rohlf F.J., 2003. Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in morphometrics. Journal of Human Evolution 44: 665-683.
27. Rohlf F.J., Bookstein F.L., (Eds), 1990. Proceedings of the Michigan MorphometricsWorkshop. Museum of Zoology special publication no. 2, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
28. Rohlf F.J., Corti M., 2000. Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Systematic Biology 49: 740-753.
29. Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E., 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
30. Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E., 1991. GRF-Generalized rotational fit methods, version 1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York.
31. Slater G.J., VanValkenburgh B., 2008. Long in the tooth: evolution of sabertooth cat cranial shape. Paleobiology 34: 403-419.
32. Slice D.E., 2001. Landmarks aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Systematic Biology 50: 141-149.
33. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J., 2012. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 4th Edition. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
34. Souto-Lima R.B., Millien V., 2014. The influence of environmental factors on the morphology of red-backed voles Myodes gapperi (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) in Québec and western Labrador. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112: 204-218.
35. Thompson D.A.W., 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge, London.