Visualizations in geometric morphometrics: How to read and how to make graphs showing shape changes

Hystrix

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Klingenberg, Christian Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Geometric morphometrics; Landmarks; Procrustes superimposition; Thin plate spline; Transformation grids; Warping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877812046     PISSN: 03941914     EISSN: 18255272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4404/hystrix-24.1-7691     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Arthur W., 2006. D'Arcy Thompson and the theory of transformations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 401-406.
2. Astúa D., 2010. Cranial sexual dimorphism in New World marsupials and a test of Rensch's rule in Didelphidae. J. Mammal. 91: 1011-1024.
3. Baylac M., Penin X., 1998. Wing static allometry in Drosophila simulans males (Dip-tera, Drosophilidae) and its relationships with developmental compartments. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 44: 97-112.
4. Bookstein F.L., 1978. The measurement of biological shape and shape change. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
5. Bookstein F.L., 1989. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11: 567-585.
6. Bookstein F.L., 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Bookstein F.L., 1996a. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull. Math. Biol. 58: 313-365.
8. Bookstein F.L., 1996b. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. In: Marcus L.F., Corti M., Loy A., Naylor G.J.P., Slice D.E. (Eds.) Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York. 131-151.
9. Bookstein F.L., 1996c. Standard formula for the uniform shape component in landmark data. In: Marcus L.F., Corti M., Loy A., Naylor G.J.P., Slice D.E. (Eds.) Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York. 153-168.
10. Bookstein F.L., Schäfer K., Prossinger H., Seidler H., Fieder M., Stringer C.B., Weber G.W., Arsuaga J.-L., Slice D.E., Rohlf F.J., Recheis W., Mariam A.J., Marcus L.F., 1999. Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern Homo by morphometric analysis. Anatomical Record (New Anatomist) 257: 217-224.
11. Breuker C.J., Patterson J.S., Klingenberg C.P., 2006. A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape. PLoS ONE 1(1): e7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000007
12. Bruner E., Martin-Loeches M., Colom R., 2010. Human midsagittal brain shape variation: patterns, allometry and integration. J. Anat. 216: 589-599.
13. Chapman R.E., 1990. Conventional Procrustes approaches. In: Rohlf F.J., Bookstein F.L. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI. 251-267.
14. Claes P., Walters M., Vandermeulen D., Clement J.G., 2011. Spatially-dense 3D facial asymmetry assessment in both typical and disordered growth. J. Anat. 219: 444-455.
15. Claude J., 2008. Morphometrics with R. Springer, New York.
16. Drake A.G., 2011. Dispelling dog dogma: an investigation of heterochrony in dogs using 3D geometric morphometric analysis of skull shape. Evol. Dev. 13: 204-213.
17. Drake A.G., Klingenberg C.P., 2008. The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St. Bernard dogs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275: 71-76.
18. Drake A.G., Klingenberg C.P., 2010. Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. Am. Nat. 175: 289-301.
19. Dryden I.L., Mardia K.V., 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
20. Duarte L.C., Monteiro L.R., Von Zuben F.J., Dos Reis S.F., 2000. Variation in mandible shape in Trichomys apereoides (Mammalia: Rodentia): geometric analysis of a complex morphological structure. Syst. Biol. 49: 563-578.
21. Dworkin I., Gibson G., 2006. Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-β signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173: 1417-1431.
22. Florio A.M., Ingram C.M., Rakotondravony H.A., Louis E.E., Jr., Raxworthy C.J., 2012. Detecting cryptic speciation in the widespread and morphologically conservative carpet chameleon (Furcifer lateralis) of Madagascar. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 1399-1414.
23. Fortuny J., Marcé Nogué J., De Esteban-Trivigno S., Gil L., Galobart À., 2011. Temnospon-dyli bite club: ecomorphological patterns of the most diverse group of early tetrapods. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 2040-2054.
24. Frost S.R., Marcus L.F., Bookstein F.L., Reddy D.P., Delson E., 2003. Cranial allometry, phylogeography, and systematics of large-bodied papionins (Primates: Cercopithecinae) inferred from geometric morphometric analysis of landmark data. Anat. Rec. 275A: 1048-1072.
25. Gidaszewski N.A., Baylac M., Klingenberg C.P., 2009. Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. BMC Evol. Biol. 9: 110.
26. Gómez-Robles A., Olejniczak A.J., Martinón-Torres M., Prado-Simón L., Bermúdez de Castro J.M., 2011. Evolutionary novelties and losses in geometric morphometrics: a practical approach through hominin molar morphology. Evolution 65: 1772-1790.
27. Goodall C.R., 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 53: 285-339.
28. Gopen G.D., 2004. The sense of structure: writing from the reader's perspective. Pearson Longman, New York.
29. Gower J.C., 1975. Generalized Procruses analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33-51.
30. Hammond P., Hutton T.J., Allanson J.E., Buxton B., Campbell L.E., Clayton-Smith J., Don-nai D., Karmiloff-Smith A., Metcalfe K., Murphy K.C., Patton M.A., Pober B., Prescott K., Scambler P., Shaw A., Smith A.C.M., Stevens A.F., Temple I.K., Hennekam R.C.M., Tassabehji M., 2005. Discriminating power of localized three-dimensional facial morphology. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77: 999-1010.
31. Kendall D.G., Barden D., Carne T.K., Le H., 1999. Shape and shape theory. Wiley, Chichester.
32. Klingenberg C.P., 2008a. Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 115-132.
33. Klingenberg C.P., 2008b. Novelty and "homology-free" morphometrics: What's in a name? Evol. Biol. 35: 186-190.
34. Klingenberg C.P., 2009. Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a-priori hypotheses. Evol. Dev. 11: 405-421.
35. Klingenberg C.P., 2010. Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 623-635.
36. Klingenberg C.P., Barluenga M., Meyer A., 2003a. Body shape variation in cichlid fishes of the Amphilophus citrinellus species complex. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 397-408.
37. Klingenberg C.P., Duttke S., Whelan S., Kim M., 2012. Developmental plasticity, morphological variation and evolvability: a multilevel analysis of morphometric integration in the shape of compound leaves. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 115-129.
38. Klingenberg C.P., Leamy L.J., 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55: 2342-2352.
39. Klingenberg C.P., Leamy L.J., Cheverud J.M., 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166: 1909-1921.
40. Klingenberg C.P., Leamy L.J., Routman E.J., Cheverud J.M., 2001. Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morpho-metrics. Genetics 157: 785-802.
41. Klingenberg C.P., McIntyre G.S., 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52: 1363-1375.
42. Klingenberg C.P., McIntyre G.S., Zaklan S.D., 1998. Left-right asymmetry of fly wings and the evolution of body axes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 265(1402): 1255-1259.
43. Klingenberg C.P., Mebus K., Auffray J.-C., 2003b. Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evol. Dev. 5: 522-531.
44. Klingenberg C.P., Monteiro L.R., 2005. Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: implications for morphometric applications. Syst. Biol. 54: 678-688.
45. Klingenberg C.P., Wetherill L.F., Rogers J.L., Moore E.S., Ward R.E., Autti-Rämö I., Fager-lund Å., Jacobson S.W., Robinson L.K., Hoyme H.E., Mattson S.N., Li T.K., Riley E.P., Foroud T., CIFASD, 2010. Prenatal alcohol exposure alters the patterns of facial asymmetry. Alcohol 44: 649-657.
46. Klingenberg C.P., Zaklan S.D., 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54: 1273-1285.
47. Kristensen E., Parsons T.E., Hallgrímsson B., Boyd S.K., 2008. A novel 3-D image-based morphological method for phenotypic analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55: 2826-2831.
48. Marcus L.F., 1998. Variation in selected skeletal elements of the fossil remains of Myotragus balearicus, a Pleistocene bovid from Mallorca. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 44: 113-137.
49. Marcus L.F., Hingst-Zaher E., Zaher H., 2000. Application of landmark morphometrics to skulls representing the orders of living mammals. Hystrix 11(1): 27-47. doi:10.4404/hystrix-11.1-4135
50. Monteiro L.R., 1999. Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Syst. Biol. 48: 192-199.
51. Monteiro L.R., dos Reis S.F., 1999. Princípios de morfometria geométrica. Holos, Ribeirão Preto.
52. O'Higgins P., Cobb S.N., Fitton L.C., Gröning F., Phillips R., Liu J., Fagan M.J., 2011. Combining geometric morphometrics and functional simulation: an emerging toolkit for virtual functional analyses. J. Anat. 218: 3-15.
53. O'Higgins P., Jones N., 1998. Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. J. Anat. 193: 251-272.
54. O'Higgins P., Milne N., 2013. Applying geometric morphometrics to compare changes in size and shape arising from finite elements analyses. Hystrix 24(1) (Online First). doi:10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6284
55. Oxnard C.E., O'Higgins P., 2009. Biology clearly needs morphometrics. Does morphomet-rics need biology? Biol. Theor. 4: 84-97.
56. Pierce S.E., Angielczyk K.D., Rayfield E.J., 2008. Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: a combined geometric morpho-metric and finite element modeling approach. J. Morphol. 269: 840-864.
57. Robinson D.L., Blackwell P.G., Stillman E.C., Brook A.H., 2001. Planar Procrustes analysis of tooth shape. Arch. Oral Biol. 46: 191-199.
58. Rodríguez-Mendoza R., Muñoz M., Saborido-Rey F., 2011. Ontogenetic allometry of the bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (Teleostei: Scorpaenidae), in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean based on geometric morphometrics. Hydrobiolo-gia 670: 5-22.
59. Rohlf F.J., 1993. Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. In: Marcus L.F., Bello E., García-Valdecasas A. (Eds.) Contributions to morpho-metrics. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. 131-159.
60. Rohlf F.J., 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Clas-sif. 16: 197-223.
61. Rohlf F.J., Bookstein F.L., 2003. Computing the uniform component of shape variation. Syst. Biol. 52: 66-69.
62. Rohlf F.J., Loy A., Corti M., 1996. Morphometric analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) using partial-warp scores. Syst. Biol. 45: 344-362.
63. Rohlf F.J., Marcus L.F., 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 129-132.
64. Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E., 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superim-position of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39: 40-59.
65. Siegel A.F., Benson R.H., 1982. A robust comparison of biological shapes. Biometrics 38: 341-350.
66. Small C.G., 1996. The statistical theory of shape. Springer-Verlag, New York.
67. Sneath P.H.A., 1967. Trend-surface analysis of transformatrion grids. Journal of Zoology 151: 65-122.
68. Thompson D.A.W., 1961. On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
69. Walker J.A., 2000. Ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known cov-ariance matrix. Syst. Biol. 49: 686-696.
70. Weber G.W., Bookstein F.L., 2011. Virtual anthropology: a guide to a new interdisciplinary field. Springer, Vienna.
71. Webster M., 2011. The structure of cranidial shape variation in three early ptychoparioid trilobite species from the Dyeran-Delamarean (traditional "lower-middle" Cambrian) boundary interval of Nevada, U.S.A. J. Paleontol. 85: 179-225.
72. Weinberg S.M., Andreasen N.C., Nopoulos P., 2009. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of brain shape in nonsyndromic orofacial clefting. J. Anat. 214: 926-936.
73. Weisensee K.E., Jantz R.L., 2011. Secular change in craniofacial morphology of the Portuguese using geometric morphometrics. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 145: 548-559.
74. Wiley D.F., Amenta N., Alcantara D.A., Ghosh D., Kil Y.J., Delson E., Harcourt-Smith W., Rohlf F.J., John K., Hamann B., 2005. Evolutionary morphing. Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization 2005 (VIS'05): 431-438.
75. Willmore K.E., Klingenberg C.P., Hallgrímsson B., 2005. The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution 59: 898-909.
76. Workman M.S., Leamy L.J., Routman E.J., Cheverud J.M., 2002. Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice. Genetics 160: 1573-1586.
77. Zelditch M.L., Swiderski D.L., Sheets H.D., 2012. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
78. Zollikofer C.P.E., Ponce de León M.S., 2002. Visualizing patterns of craniofacial shape variation in Homo sapiens. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269: 801-807.