Short-term neuroplastic effects of brain-controlled and muscle-controlled electrical stimulation

Neuromodulation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 233-240

  McGie, Steven C ^a   Zariffa, José ^a,b   Popovic, Milos R ^a,b   Nagai, Mary K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brain machine interface; electromyography; functional electrical stimulation; neuroplasticity; spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTOR POLLICIS BREVIS MUSCLE; ACTION POTENTIAL AMPLITUDE; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE CONTROLLED FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACES GUIDED VOLUNTARY GRASPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAM CONTROLLED FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FLEXOR POLLICIS BREVIS MUSCLE; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MAXIMUM VOLUNTARY CONTRACTION; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; OPPONENS POLLICIS MUSCLE; PUSH BUTTON CONTROLLED FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VOLUNTARY GRASPING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HAND STRENGTH; INNERVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84936930115     PISSN: 10947159     EISSN: 15251403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12185     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson KD,. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 2004; 21: 1371-1383.
2. Popovic MR, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray CF,. Functional electrical stimulation therapy of voluntary grasping versus only conventional rehabilitation for patients with subacute incomplete tetraplegia: a randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 433-442.
3. Barsi GI, Popovic DB, Tarkka IM, Sinkjaer T, Grey MJ,. Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2008; 191: 57-66.
4. Rushton DN,. Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation-an hypothesis. Med Eng Phys 2003; 25: 75-78.
5. Hebb D,. The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. Florence, KY: Psychology Press, 1949.
6. Birbaumer N, Murguialday AR, Weber C, Montoya P,. Neurofeedback and brain-computer interface: clinical applications. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009; 86: 107-117.
7. Pfurtscheller G, Muller GR, Pfurtscheller J, Gerner HJ, Rupp R,. "Thought"-control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neurosci Lett 2003; 351: 33-36.
8. Muller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G, Rupp R,. EEG-based neuroprostheses control: a step towards clinical practice. Neurosci Lett 2005; 382: 169-174.
9. Saxena S, Nikolic S, Popovic DB,. An EMG-controlled grasping system for tetraplegics. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32: 17-24.
10. Popovic MR, Keller T, Pappas IPI, Dietz V, Morari M,. Surface-stimulation technology for grasping and walking neuroprostheses. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2001; 20: 82-93.
11. Thorsen R, Spadone R, Ferrarin M,. A pilot study of myoelectrically controlled FES of upper extremity. IEEE TNSRE 2001; 9: 161-168.
12. Chiou Y-H, Luh J-J, Chen S-C, Chen Y-L, Lai J-S, Kuo T-E,. Patient-driven loop control for hand function restoration in a non-invasive functional electrical stimulation. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 1499-1505.
13. Daly JJ, Cheng R, Rogers J, Litinas K, Hrovat K, Dohring M,. Feasibility of a new application of noninvasive brain computer interface (BCI): a case study of training for recovery of volitional motor control after stroke. JNPT 2009; 33: 203-211.
14. Takahashi M, Takeda K, Otaka Y, et al. Event related desynchronization-modulated functional electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 56. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-56.
15. Niazi IK, Mrachacz-Kersting N, Dremstrup K, Farina D,. Peripheral electrical stimulation triggered by self-paced detection of motor intention enhances motor evoked potentials. IEEE TNSRE 2012; 20: 595-604.
16. Cauraugh JH, Light K, Kim S, Thigpen M, Behrman A,. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke 2000; 31: 1360-1364.
17. Cauraugh JH, Kim S,. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke 2002; 33: 1589-1594.
18. Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 570-575.
19. Hara Y, Ogawa S, Tsuhiuchi K, Muraoka Y,. A home-based rehabilitation program for the hemiplegic upper extremity by power-assisted functional electrical stimulation. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 296-304.
20. Hummelsheim H, Amberger S, Maurtiz KH,. The influence of EMG-initiated electrical muscle stimulation on motor recovery of the centrally paretic hand. Eur J Neurol 1996; 3: 245-254.
21. Mrachacz-Kersting N, Kristensen SR, Niazi IK, Farina D,. Precise temporal association between cortical potentials evoked by motor imagination and afference induces cortical plasticity. J Physiol 2012; 590: 1669-1682.
22. Kapadia NM, Zivanovic V, Furlan J, Craven BC, McGillivray C, Popovic MR,. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute's functional electrical stimulation therapy for grasping in traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury: randomized control trial. Artif Organs 2011; 35: 212-216.
23. Popovic MR, Keller T,. Modular transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation system. Med Eng Phys 2005; 27: 81-92.
24. Moller C, Arai N, Lucke J, Ziemann U,. Hysteresis effects on the input-output curve of motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 1003-1008.
25. Devanne H, Lavoie BA, Capaday C,. Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res 1997; 114: 329-338.
26. Knash ME, Kido A, Gorassini MA, Chan KM, Stein RB,. Electrical stimulation of the human common peroneal nerve elicits lasting facilitation of cortical motor evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res 2003; 221: 366-377.
27. Taylor JL, Martin PG,. Voluntary motor output is altered by spike-timing-dependent changes in the human corticospinal pathway. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 11708-11716.
28. Thompson AK, Stein RB,. Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on motor-evoked potentials in ankle flexor and extensor muscles. Exp Brain Res 2004; 159: 491-500.
29. Everaert DG, Thompson A,. Does functional electrical stimulation for foot drop strengthen corticospinal connections? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 168-177.
30. Stein RB, Everaert DG, Roy FD, Chong S-L, Soleimani M,. Facilitation of corticospinal connections in able-bodied people and people with central nervous system disorders using eight interventions. J Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 30: 66-78.
31. Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, Mastaglia FL,. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 2025-2029.
32. Wolters A, Sandbrink F, Schlottmann A, et al. A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 2003; 89: 2339-2345.
33. Uy J, Ridding MC, Hillier S, Thompson PD, Miles TS,. Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? Neurology 2003; 61: 982-984.
34. Goldman-Rakic PS, Cools AR, Srivastava K,. The prefrontal landscape: implications of functional architecture for understanding the human mentation and the central executive. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 1996; 351: 1445-1453.
35. Ramsey N, van de Heuvel MP, Kho KH, Leijten FSS,. Towards human BCI applications based on cognitive brain systems: an investigation of neural signals recorded from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. IEEE TNSRE 2006; 14: 214-217.
36. Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ,. Multichannel EEG-based brain-computer communication. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90: 444-449.
37. Birbaumer N, Ghanayim N, Hinterberger T, et al. A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 1999; 398: 297-298.
38. Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J,. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92: 66-72.
39. Conte A, Gilio F, Iezzi E, Frasca V, Inggilleri M, Beradelli A,. Attention influences the excitability of cortical motor areas in healthy humans. Exp Brain Res 2007; 182: 109-117.