Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 11-32

  Casati, Anne ^a   Genet, Corine ^a  

^a GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Boundary; Career path; Engagement; Position; Practices; Principal investigator; Role; Scientific entrepreneur

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895058753     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9275-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
2. Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369-1397.
3. Bozeman, B., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Editor's introduction: Building and deploying scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 565-568.
4. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Seuil.
5. Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-563.
6. Catherine, D., Corolleur, C., Carrere, A., & Mangematin, V. (2004). Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: The experience of biotech start-ups in France. Research Policy, 33(4), 631-642.
7. Crawford, E., LePine, J., & Rich, B. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834-848.
8. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as 'quasi-firms': The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
9. Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 127-141.
10. Frestedt, J. (2008). The role and impact of the principal investigator. Monitor, 31-35.
11. Jian, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialisation activity. Research Policy, 38, 922-935.
12. Joerges, B., & Shinn, T. (Eds.). (2000). Instrumentation between science, state and industry: Between science, state, and industry. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
13. Joly, P. B., & Mangematin, V. (1996). Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisations of R&D: The dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation. Research Policy, 25(6), 901-922.
14. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1982). Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science. Social Studies of Science, 12, 101-130.
15. Lam, A. (2010). From 'Ivory Tower Traditionalists' tp 'Entrepreneurial Scientists'? Academic scientists in fuzzy university-industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307-340.
16. Langlois, R. (2000). Modularity in technology and organisation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49(1), 19-47.
17. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Latour, B. (1991). Le métier de directeur de recherche. In D. Vinck (Ed.), Gestion de la recherche. Brussels: De Boeck.
19. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
20. Mangematin, V. S., Deschamp, B., & Genet, C. (2012). Project management: Learning by violating principles. Advances in Strategic Management, 28, 187-212.
21. Richard, P. J., & Devinney, T. M. (2005). Modular strategies: B2B technology and architectural knowledge. California Management Review, 47(4), 86-113.
22. Sabatier, V., Kennard, A., & Mangematin, V. (2012). When technological discontinuities and disruptive business models challenge dominant industry logics: Insights from the drugs industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 949-962.
23. Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., Laurent, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., & Newell, S. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579-1600.
24. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
25. Shibayama, S. (2010). Conflict between entrepreneurship and open science, and the transition of scientific norms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4): 508-531.
26. Shinn, T. (1988). Hiérarchies des chercheurs et formes de recherche. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 74, 2-22.
27. Siow, A. (1998). Tenure and other unusual Personnel practices in Academia. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 14(1), 152-173.
28. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy-Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
29. Tippmann, E., Sharkey Scott, P., & Mangematin, V. (2012). Problem solving in MNCs: How local and global solutions are (and are not) created. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(8), 746-771.
30. Weick, K. (1979). A social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Weick, K. E. (2003). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(3), 505-509.
32. Wenger, R. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Wright, M., Birley, S., & Mosey, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4), 235-246.