A cocaine context renews drug seeking preferentially in a subset of individuals

Neuropsychopharmacology

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2816-2823

  Saunders, Benjamin T ^a,b   O'Donnell, Elizabeth G ^a   Aurbach, Elyse L ^b   Robinson, Terry E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; DOPAMINE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITOR; FLUPENTIXOL;

ANIMAL; ASSOCIATION; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DRUG EFFECTS; DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIOR; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REINFORCEMENT; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; COCAINE; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITORS; DRUG-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FLUPENTHIXOL; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SELF ADMINISTRATION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84936757355     PISSN: 0893133X     EISSN: 1740634X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2014.131     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ahrens AM, Robinson TE (2013). An occasion-setter exerts much greater control over conditioned responding in goal-trackers than in sign-trackers. Soc Neurosci Abstracts Program No. 96.07/JJJ3. San Diego, CA. Online.
2. Baum M, Bindra D (1968). Conditioned incentive motivation, spontaneous behaviour, and inhibition of delay. Can J Psychol 22:323.
3. Baumeister A, Hawkins WF, Cromwell RL (1964). Need states and activity level. Psychol Bull 61:438.
4. Boakes RA (1977). Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H, Hurwitz H (eds). Operant-Pavlovian Interactions. Earlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, pp 67-97.
5. Bossert JM, Poles GC, Wihbey KA, Koya E, Shaham Y (2007). Differential effects of blockade of dopamine D1-family receptors in nucleus accumbens core or shell on reinstatement of heroin seeking induced by contextual and discrete cues. J Neurosci 27:12655-12663.
6. Bouton ME (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychol Bull 114:80.
7. Bouton ME (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biol Psychiatry 52:976-986.
8. Bouton ME, Winterbauer NE, Todd TP (2012). Relapse processes after the extinction of instrumental learning: renewal, resurgence, and reacquisition. Behav Processes 90:130-141.
9. Campbell BA (1960). Effects of water deprivation on random activity. J Comp Physiol Psychol 53:240.
10. Cardinal RN, Parkinson JA, Hall J, Everitt BJ (2002). Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:321-352.
11. Chaudhri N, Sahuque LL, Janak PH (2009). Ethanol seeking triggered by environmental context is attenuated by blocking dopamine D1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell in rats. Psychopharmacology 207:303-314.
12. Clark JJ, Hollon NG, Phillips PE (2012). Pavlovian valuation systems in learning and decision making. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:1054-1061.
13. Crombag HS, Bossert JM, Koya E, Shaham Y (2008). Contextinduced relapse to drug seeking: a review. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 363:3233-3243.
14. Flagel SB, Akil H, Robinson TE (2009). Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropharmacology 56:139-148.
15. Flagel SB, Robinson TE, Clark JJ, Clinton SM, Watson SJ, Seeman P et al (2010). An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:388-400.
16. Franklin TR, Druhan JP (2000). Involvement of the nucleus accumbens and medial prefrontal cortex in the expression of conditioned hyperactivity to a cocaine-associated environment in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 23:633-644.
17. Fuchs RA, Eaddy JL, Su ZI, Bell GH (2007). Interactions of the basolateral amygdala with the dorsal hippocampus and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex regulate drug contextinduced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking in rats. Eur J Neurosci 26:487-498.
18. Fuchs RA, Evans KA, Ledford CC, Parker MP, Case JM, Mehta RH et al (2005). The role of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, and dorsal hippocampus in contextual reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:296-309.
19. Fuchs RA, Ramirez DR, Bell GH (2008). Nucleus accumbens shell and core involvement in drug context-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology 200:545-556.
20. Gold LH, Swerdlow NR, Koob GF (1988). The role of mesolimbic dopamine in conditioned locomotion produced by amphetamine. Behav Neurosci 102:544.
21. Hearst E, Jenkins H (1974). Sign-tracking: the stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action Monograph of the Psychonomic Society: Austin.
22. Hemby S, Jones G, Justice J Jr, Neill D (1992). Conditioned locomotor activity but not conditioned place preference following intra-accumbens infusions of cocaine. Psychopharmacology 106:330-336.
23. Hickey C, Chelazzi L, Theeuwes J (2010). Reward guides vision when it's your thing: trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming. PLoS One 5:e14087.
24. Hickey C, van Zoest W (2012). Reward creates oculomotor salience. Curr Biol 22:R219-R220.
25. Hinson RE, Poulos CX (1981). Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:559-562.
26. Holland PC, Bouton ME (1999). Hippocampus and context in classical conditioning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:195-202.
27. Lasseter HC, Xie X, Arguello AA, Wells AM, Hodges MA, Fuchs RA (2014). Contribution of a mesocorticolimbic subcircuit to drug context-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 39:660-669.
28. Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Robinson TE (2011). Rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues are also prone to impulsive action. Behav Brain Res 223:255-261.
29. Meyer PJ, Cogan ES, Robinson TE (2014). The form of a conditioned stimulus influences the degree to which it acquires incentive motivational properties. PLoS One 9:e98163.
30. Meyer PJ, Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Flagel SB, Morrow JD et al (2012). Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues. PLoS One 7:e38987.
31. Milton AL, Everitt BJ (2010). The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation: implications for the treatment of addiction. Eur J Neurosci 31:2308-2319.
32. Morrow JD, Maren S, Robinson TE (2011). Individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to an appetitive cue predicts the propensity to attribute motivational salience to an aversive cue. Behav Brain Res 220:238-243.
33. Paolone G, Angelakos CC, Meyer PJ, Robinson TE, Sarter M (2013). Cholinergic control over attention in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues. J Neurosci 33:8321-8335.
34. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247-291.
35. Robinson TE, Flagel SB (2009). Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences. Biol Psychiatry 65:869-873.
36. Robinson TE, Yager LM, Cogan ES, Saunders BT (2014). On the motivational properties of reward cues: individual differences. Neuropharmacology 76:450-459.
37. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2010). A cocaine cue acts as an incentive stimulus in some but not others: implications for addiction. Biol Psychiatry 67:730-736.
38. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2011). Individual variation in the motivational properties of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:1668-1676.
39. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2012). The role of dopamine in the accumbens core in the expression of Pavlovian-conditioned responses. Eur J Neurosci 36:2521-2532.
40. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2013a). Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:1955-1975.
41. Saunders BT, Yager LM, Robinson TE (2013b). Cue-evoked cocaine 'craving': role of dopamine in the accumbens core. J Neurosci 33:13989-14000.
42. Stewart J, de Wit H, Eikelboom R (1984). Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev 91:251-268.
43. Verbeke G (2009). Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer: New York, NY.
44. Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1987). A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 94:469.
45. Yager LM, Robinson TE (2013). A classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires greater control over motivated behavior in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. Psychopharmacology 226:217-228.