Post-industrial landscapes as drivers for urban redevelopment: Public versus expert perspectives towards the benefits and barriers of the reuse of post-industrial sites in urban areas

Habitat International

Volumn 45, Issue P2, 2015, Pages 72-81

  Loures, Luís ^a,b  

^a POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF PORTALEGRE   (Portugal)

^b CIEO Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Barriers to redevelopment; Benefits of redevelopment; Post industrial sites; Public versus expert opinion; Urban transformation

Indexed keywords

GREENSPACE; LANDSCAPE; URBAN AREA; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84911366895     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams D., Watkins C. Greenfields, brownfields and housing development 2002, Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
2. Alberini A., Longo A., Tonin S., Trombetta F., Turvani M. The role of liability, regulation and economic incentives in brownfield remediation and redevelopment: evidence from surveys of developers. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2005, 35(4):327-351.
3. De-industrialization: Social, cultural and political aspects 2002, University Press, Cambridge. B. Allen, M. Linden (Eds.).
4. Amekudzi A. Integrating brownfields redevelopment with transportation planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 2004, 130(4):204-212.
5. Transformation of urban and suburban landscapes: Perspectives from philosophy, geography, and architecture 2002, Lexington Books, New York. G. Backhaus, J. Murungi (Eds.).
6. Bartsch C., Anderson C. Matrix of brownfields programs by state 1998, Retrieved April 10, 2007, from. http://www.nemw.org/bfmartrix.htm.
7. Bartsch C., Collaton E., Pepper E. Coming clean for economic development: A resource book on environmental cleanup and economic development opportunities 1996, Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington DC.
8. BenDor T., Metcalf S. Conceptual modeling and dynamic simulation of brownfield redevelopment. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 17-21, 2005, Boston 2005.
9. Bengston D., Fletcher J., Nelson K. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69(2-3):271-286.
10. Brebbia A., Almorza D., Klapperich H. Brownfield sites: Assessment, rehabilitation and development 2002, WIT Press, Southampton.
11. Brueckner J. Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 2000, 23(2):160-171.
12. Buchecker M., Hunziker M., Kienast F. Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 64:29-46.
13. Cairney T. The re-use of contaminated land: A handbook of risk assessment 1995, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
14. De Sousa C. Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: a private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the greater Toronto area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2000, 43(6):831-853.
15. De Sousa C. Brownfield redevelopment in Toronto: an examination of past trends and future prospects. Land Use Policy 2002, 19:297-309.
16. De Sousa C. Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 62:181-198.
17. De Sousa C. Unearthing the benefits of brownfield to greenspace projects: an examination of project use and quality of life impacts. Local Environment 2006, 11(5):577-600.
18. Demo P. Educação pela pesquisa 1996, Autores Associados, São Paulo.
19. Ekman E. Strategies for reclaiming urban postindustrial landscapes 2004, Master thesis, Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
20. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The brownfields economic redevelopment initiative: Application guidelines for demonstration projects 1995, Retrieved March 12, 2006, from. http://www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/pilot.htm.
21. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Superfund 2009, Retrieved June 12, 2009, from. http://epa.gov/superfund/policy/cercla.htm.
22. European Council for Construction Research, Development and Innovation Building the future 2001, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
23. Francis M. Acase study method for landscape architecture 1999, The Landscape Architecture Foundation, Washington DC.
24. Gibbons J., Attoh-Okine N., Laha S. Brownfields redevelopment issues revisited. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 1998, 10(1):151-162.
25. Johnson M. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A 2001, 33(4):717-735.
26. Kaufman D., Cloutier N. The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2006, 33:19-30.
27. Loures L. Planning and design in post-industrial landscapes: East Bank Arade River - Lagoa, case study 2011, Ph.D thesis, University of Algarve, Portugal.
28. McCarthy L. The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: reducing barriers to private redevelopment while connecting reuse to broader community goals. Land Use Policy 2002, 19(4):287-296.
29. McGrath T. Urban industrial land redevelopment and contamination risk. Journal of Urban Economics 2000, 47(3):414-442.
30. Meyer P. Real estate appraisers and access to redevelopment finance. Financing brownfield reuse 1998, 21-28. Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington DC. C. Bartsch (Ed.).
31. Meyer P. Accounting for stigma on contaminated lands: the potential contributions of environmental insurance coverages. Environmental Claims Journal 2000, 12(3):33-55.
32. Miller K., Greenberg M., Lowrie K., Mayer H. Brownfields redevelopment fights sprawl. New Jersey Municipalities 2001, 78(3):26-29.
33. Moudon A. Acatholic approach to organizing what urban designers should know. The urban design reader 2007, Routledge, London and New York. M. Larice, E. Macdonald (Eds.).
34. Ozdil T. Assessing the economic revitalization impact of urban design improvements: The Texas main street program 2006, Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, Texas.
35. Panagopoulos T., Loures L. Reclamation of derelict industrial land in Portugal: greening is not enough. Book of Abstracts of the 10th European Forum on Urban Forestry, May 16-19, 2007, Gelsenkirchen, Germany 2007, 71-72.
36. Paull E. The environmental and economic impacts of brownfields redevelopment 2008, Retrieved March 15, 2009, from. http://www.nemw.org/images/stories/documents/EnvironEconImpacts%20BFRedev.pdf.
37. Pediaditi K., Wehrmeyer W., Chenoweth J. Monitoring sustainability of brownfield redevelopment projects - the redevelopment assessment framework. Land Contamination and Reclamation 2005, 13(2):173-183.
38. Pepper E. Lessons from the field 1997, Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington DC.
39. Portney K. Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities 2003, MIT Press, Cambridge.
40. Rea C. Rethinking the industrial landscape: The future of the ford rouge complex 1991, Master thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
41. Groundwell: Constructing the contemporary landscape 2005, The Museum of Modern Art, New York. P. Reed (Ed.).
42. Secchi B. Section 1: wasted and reclaimed landscapes: rethinking and redesigning the urban landscape. Places 2007, 19(1):6-11.
43. Simons R. Turning brownfields into greenbacks: Redeveloping and financing environmentally contaminated urban real estate 1998, Urban Land Institute, Washington DC.
44. Thayer R. Gray world, green heart 1994, John Wiley, New York.
45. Tyman S. Gunpowder park: A case study of post-industrial reinhabitation 2008, Master thesis, University of Oregon, Oregon.
46. Tymoff M. Reinterpreting the post-industrial landscape Athens' former manufactured gas plant 2001, Master thesis, University of Georgia, Athens.
47. Urban Land Institute Barriers and solutions to land assembly for infill development 2004, The Urban Land Institute, Washington DC.
48. Wall A. Programming the urban surface. Recovering landscape: Essays in contemporary landscape theory 1999, 233-249. Princeton Architectural Press, New York. J. Corner (Ed.).
49. Willem K. Taxing land for urban containment: reflections on a Dutch debate. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(2):233-241.
50. Wright J. Risks and rewards of brownfield redevelopment 1997, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge.
51. Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods 1994, Sage Publications, London.