Free at Last? Judicial discretion and racial disparities in federal sentencing

Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 75-111

  Yang, Crystal S ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84934766386     PISSN: 00472530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/680989     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrams, David S., Marianne Bertrand, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2012. Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race? Journal of Legal Studies 41:347-83.
2. Alschuler, Albert W. 1978. Sentencing Reform and Prosecutorial Power: A Critique of Recent Proposals for "Fixed" and "Presumptive" Sentencing. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 126:550-77.
3. American Friends Service Committee. 1971. Struggle for Justice: A Report on Crime and Punishment in America. New York: Hill & Wang.
4. Anderson, James M., Jeffrey R. Kling, and Kate Stith. 1999. Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and after the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Journal of Law and Economics 42:271-307.
5. Anwar, Shamena, Patrick Bayer, and Randi Hjalmarsson. 2012. The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127:1017-55.
6. Austin, William, and Thomas A. Williams III. 1977. A Survey of Judges' Responses to Simulated Legal Cases: Research Note on Sentencing Disparity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 69:306-10.
7. Autor, David H., and Susan N. Houseman. 2010. Do Temporary-Help Jobs Improve Labor Market Outcomes for Low-Skilled Workers? Evidence from "Work First." American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2:96-128.
8. Berman, Douglas A. 2005. Foreword: Beyond Blakely and Booker: Pondering Modern Sentencing Process. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95:653-88.
9. Fischman, Joshua B., and Max M. Schanzenbach. 2011. Do Standards of Review Matter? The Case of Federal Criminal Sentencing. Journal of Legal Studies 40:405-37.
10. Fischman, Joshua B., and Max M. Schanzenbach. 2012. Racial Disparities under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 9:729-64.
11. Frankel, Marvin E. 1973. Criminal Sentences: Law without Order. New York: Hill & Wang.
12. Freed, Daniel J. 1992. Federal Sentencing in the Wake of the Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion of Sentencers. Yale Law Journal 101:1681-1754.
13. Hofer, Paul J., Kevin R. Blackwell, and R. Barry Ruback. 1999. The Effect of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on Inter-judge Sentencing Disparity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90:239-321.
14. Kuziemko, Ilyana. 2013. How Should Inmates Be Released from Prison? An Assessment of Parole versus Fixed Sentence Regimes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 128:371-424.
15. Mustard, David B. 2001. Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts. Journal of Law and Economics 44:285-314.
16. Nagel, Ilene H., and Steven J. Schulhofer. 1992. A Tale of Three Cities: An Empirical Study of Charging and Bargaining Practices under the Sentencing Guidelines. Southern California Law Review 66:501-66.
17. Posner, Richard A. 2005. Judicial Behavior and Performance: An Economic Approach. Florida State University Law Review 32:1259-79.
18. Rehavi, M. Marit, and Sonja B. Starr. 2014. Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Sentences. Journal of Political Economy 122:1320-54.
19. Schanzenbach, Max M. 2005. Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial Demographics. Journal of Legal Studies 34:57-92.
20. Schanzenbach, Max M., and Emerson H. Tiller. 2007. Strategic Judging under the United States Sentencing Guidelines: Positive Political Theory and Evidence. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23:24-56.
21. Schanzenbach, Max M., and Emerson H. Tiller. 2008. Reviewing the Sentencing Guidelines: Judicial Politics, Empirical Evidence, and Reform. University of Chicago Law Review 75:715-60.
22. Scott, Ryan W. 2010. Inter-judge Sentencing Disparity after Booker: A First Look. Stanford Law Review 63:1-66.
23. Sessions, William K., III. 2011. At the Crossroads of the Three Branches: The U.S. Sentencing Commission's Attempts to Achieve Sentencing Reform in the Midst of Inter-branch Power Struggles. Journal of Law and Politics 26:305-57.
24. Starr, Sonja B., and M. Marit Rehavi. 2013. Mandatory Sentencing and Racial Disparity: Assessing the Role of Prosecutors and the Effects of Booker. Yale Law Journal 123:2-80.
25. Stith, Kate. 2008. The Arc of the Pendulum: Judges, Prosecutors, and the Exercise of Discretion. Yale Law Journal 117:1420-97.
26. Stith, Kate, and José A. Cabranes. 1998. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Tonry, Michael. 2005. Obsolescence and Immanence in Penal Theory and Policy. Columbia Law Review 105:1233-75.
28. Ulmer, Jeffery T., Michael T. Light, and John H. Kramer. 2011. Racial Disparity in the Wake of the Booker/Fanfan Decision: An Alternative Analysis to the USSC's 2010 Report. Criminology and Public Policy 10:1077-1118.
29. US Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1994-2009. Federal Justice Statistics Program: Arrests and Bookings for Federal Offenses [United States] (computer file). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor).
30. US Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2012. Federal Justice Statistics Program: Paired-Agency Linked Files, 2012 (computer file). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor).
31. USSC (US Sentencing Commission). 2004. Measuring Recividism: The Criminal History Computation of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
32. USSC (US Sentencing Commission). 2006. Final Report on the Impact of "United States v. Booker" on Federal Sentencing. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
33. USSC (US Sentencing Commission). 2010a. Demographic Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices: An Update of the "Booker" Report's Multivariate Regression Analysis. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
34. USSC (US Sentencing Commission). 2010b. Results of Survey of United States District Judges January 2010 through March 2010. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.
35. US Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 1983. Legislative History of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. Senate Report No. 98-225. 98th Cong., 1st sess., September 14.
36. Welch, Susan, Michael Combs, and John Gruhl. 1988. Do Black Judges Make a Difference? American Journal of Political Science 32:126-36.
37. Wheeler, Stanton, Kenneth Mann, and Austin Sarat. 1988. Sitting in Judgment: The Sentencing of White-Collar Criminals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Yang, Crystal S. 2014. Have Inter-judge Sentencing Disparities Increased in an Advisory Guidelines Regime? Evidence from Booker. New York University Law Review 89:1268-1342.