Origin of eukaryotic endomembranes: A critical evaluation of different model scenarios

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 607, Issue , 2007, Pages 38-51

  Jékely, Gáspár ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL VACUOLE; COEVOLUTION; CYTOSKELETON; EUKARYOTE; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; GENE TRANSFER; GENOMICS; HEREDITY; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEIC AUTOGAMY; PHAGOTROPH; PHYSICOCHEMICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; REVIEW; SYMBIONT;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 84934443890     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74021-8_3     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Gray MW. The endosymbiont hypothesis revisited. Int Rev Cytol 1992; 141:233-357.
2. Hirt RP, Horner DS. Organelles, genomes and eukaryote phylogeny: An Evolutionary Synthesis in the Age of Genomics. London: Taylor and Francis, 2004.
3. Cavalier-Smith T. The membranome and membrane heredity in development and evolution. In: Hirt RP, Horner DS, eds. Organelles, Genomes and Eukaryote Phylogeny: An Evolutionary Synthesis in the Age of Genomics. Vol 68. London: Taylor and Francis, 2004:335-351.
4. Mereschkowsky C. Uber natur und ursprung der chromatophoren im pflanzenreiche. Biol Centralbl 1905; 25:593-604.
5. Sagan L. On the origin of mitosing cells. J Theor Biol 1967; 14(3):255-274.
6. Sogin ML. Early evolution and the origin of eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1991; 1(4):457-463.
7. Gupta RS, Golding GB. The origin of the eukaryotic cell. Trends Biochem Sci 1996; 21(5):166-171.
8. Moreira D, López-García P. Symbiosis between methanogenic archaea and delta-proteobacteria as the origin of eukaryotes: The syntrophic hypothesis. J Mol Evol 1998; 47(5):517-530.
9. Wachtershauser G. From precells to Eukarya - a tale of two lipids. Mol Microbiol 2003; 47(1):13-22.
10. Horiike T, Hamada K, Kanaya S et al. Origin of eukaryotic cell nuclei by symbiosis of Archaea in Bacteria is revealed by homology-hit analysis. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3(2):210-214.
11. von Dohlen CD, Kohler S, Alsop ST et al. Mealybug beta-proteobacterial endosymbionts contain gamma-proteobacterial symbionts. Nature 2001; 412(6845):433-436.
12. Martin W, Muller M. The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature 1998; 392(6671):37-41.
13. Gray MW, Burger G, Lang BF. Mitochondrial evolution. Science 1999; 283(5407):1476-1481.
14. Stechmann A, Cavalier-Smith T. Rooting the eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion. Science 2002; 297(5578):89-91.
15. Richards TA, Cavalier-Smith T. Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotes. Nature 2005; 436(7054):1113-1118.
16. Martin W, Rotte C, Hoffmeister Met al. Early cell evolution, eukaryotes, anoxia, sulfide, oxygen, fungi first (?), and a tree of genomes revisited. IUBMB Life 2003; 55(4-5):193-204.
17. Thorsness PE, Fox TD. Escape of DNA from mitochondria to the nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 1990; 346(6282):376-379.
18. Martin W, Russell MJ. On the origins of cells: A hypothesis for the evolutionary transitions from abiotic geochemistry to chemoautotrophic prokaryotes, and from prokaryotes to nucleated cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003; 358(1429):59-83, (discussion 83-55).
19. Devos D, Dokudovskaya S, Alber F et al. Components of coated vesicles and nuclear pore complexes share a common molecular architecture. PLoS Biol 2004; 2(12):e380.
20. Mans BJ, Anantharaman V, Aravind L et al. Comparative genomics, evolution and origins of the nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex. Cell Cycle 2004; 3(12):1612-1637.
21. Jékely G. Glimpsing over the event horizon: Evolution of nuclear pores and envelope. Cell Cycle 2005; 4(2):297-299.
22. Avidor-Reiss T, Maer AM, Koundakjian E et al. Decoding cilia function: Defining specialized genes required for compartmentalized cilia biogenesis. Cell 2004; 117(4):527-539.
23. Jékely G, Arendt D. Evolution of intraflagellar transport from coated vesicles and autogenous origin of the eukaryotic cilium. Bioessays 2006; 28(2):191-8.
24. Margulis L, Dolan MF, Guerrero R. The chimeric eukaryote: Origin of the nucleus from the karyomastigont in amitochondriate protists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(13):6954-6959.
25. Martin W. A briefly argued case that mitochondria and plastids are descendants of endosymbionts, but that the nuclear compartment is not. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 1999; 266:1387-1395.
26. Osborne AR, Rapoport TA, van den Berg B. Protein Translocation by the Sec61/Secy Channel. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005; 21:529-550.
27. Blobel G. Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77(3):1496-1500.
28. Stanier RY. Some aspects of the biology of cells and their possible evolutionary signicance. Symp Soc Gen Microbiol 1970; 20:1-38.
29. De Duve C. Evolution of the peroxisome. Ann NY Acad Sci 1969; 168(2):369-381.
30. Cavalier-Smith T. The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52(Pt 2):297-354.
31. Cavalier-Smith T. The origin of cells: A symbiosis between genes, catalysts, and membranes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1987; 52:805-824.
32. J́kely G. Small GTPases and the evolution of the eukaryotic cell. Bioessays 2003; 25(11):1129-1138.
33. Doolittle WF. You are what you eat: A gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet 1998; 14(8):307-311.
34. Cavalier-Smith T. The origin of eukaryotic and archaebacterial cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 1987; 503:17-54.
35. De Duve C, Wattiaux R. Functions of lysosomes. Annu Rev Physiol 1966; 28:435-492.
36. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003; 19:1572-1574.
37. Ford MG, Mills IG, Peter BJ et al. Curvature of clathrin-coated pits driven by epsin. Nature 2002; 419(6905):361-366.
38. McMahon HT, Gallop JL. Membrane curvature and mechanisms of dynamic cell membrane remodelling. Nature 2005; 438(7068):590-596.
39. Farsad K, Ringstad N, Takei K et al. Generation of high curvature membranes mediated by direct endophilin bilayer interactions. J Cell Biol 2001; 155(2):193-200.
40. Lee MC, Orci L, Hamamoto S et al. Sarlp N-terminal helix initiates membrane curvature and completes the fission of a COPII vesicle. Cell 2005; 122(4):605-617.
41. Roux A, Cappello G, Cartaud J et al. A minimal system allowing tubulation with molecular motors pulling on giant liposomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(8):5394-5399.
42. Koster G, VanDuijn M, Hofs B et al. Membrane tube formation from giant vesicles by dynamic association of motor proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(26):15583-15588.
43. Roux A, Cuvelier D, Nassoy Pet al. Role of curvature and phase transition in lipid sorting and fission of membrane tubules. Embo J 2005; 24(8):1537-1545.
44. Lowe J, Amos LA. Crystal structure of the bacterial cell-division protein FtsZ. Nature 1998; 391 (6663):203-206.
45. Lowe J, Amos LA. Tubulin-like protofilaments in Ca2+-induced FtsZ sheets. Embo J 1999; 18(9):2364-2371.
46. Ben-Yehuda S, Losick R. Asymmetric cell division in B. subtilis involves a spiral-like intermediate of the cytokinetic protein FtsZ. Cell 2002; 109(2):257-266.
47. van den Ent F, Amos LA, Lowe J. Prokaryotic origin of the actin cytoskeleton. Nature 2001; 413(6851):39-44.
48. Moller-Jensen J, Jensen RB, Lowe J et al. Prokaryotic DNA segregation by an actin-like filament. Embo J 2002; 21(12):3119-3127.
49. Moller-Jensen J, Lowe J. Increasing complexity of the bacterial cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005; 17(1):75-81.
50. Surrey T, Nedelec F, Leibler S et al. Physical properties determining self-organization of motors and microtubules. Science 2001; 292(5519):1167-1171.
51. Nedelec F. Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable antiparallel microtubule interactions. J Cell Biol 2002; 158(6):1005-1015.
52. Camalet S, Jiilicher F, Prost J. Self-organized beating and swimming of internally driven filaments. Physical Review Letters 1999; 82(7): 1590-1593.
53. Bryant MP, Wolin EA, Wolin MJ et al. Methanobacillus omelianskii, a symbiotic association of two species of bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol 1967; 59(1):20-31.