Investigation of biofilm formation in clinical isolates of staphylococcus aureus

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1085, Issue , 2014, Pages 195-211

  Cassat, James E ^a   Smeltzer, Mark S ^b   Lee, Chia Y ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Flow cell; Implant associated biofilm; Microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules; MRSA; Poly N acetylglucosamine; Polysaccharide intercellular adhesion; S. aureus

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; BIOFILM; CELL ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEMALE; FLOW CELL ASSAY; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROTITER PLATE ASSAY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL DENSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; MURINAE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

ANIMALS; BIOFILMS; CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS; CATHETERS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MICE; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 84934437126     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-664-1_12     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lewis K (2001) Riddle of biofi lm resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:999-1007
2. Keren I, Kaldalu N, Spoering A et al (2004) Persister cells and tolerance to antimicrobials. FEMS Microbiol Lett 230:13-18
3. Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ et al (1994) MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol 48:585-617
4. Sillanpaa J, Xu Y, Nallapareddy SR et al (2004) A family of putative MSCRAMMs from Enterococcus faecalis . Microbiology 150: 2069-2078
5. Beenken KE, Blevins JS, Smeltzer MS (2003) Mutation of sarA in Staphylococcus aureus limits biofi lm formation. Infect Immun 71: 4206-4211
6. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M et al (2004) Presence of the ica operon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and its role in biofi lm production. Clin Microbiol Infect 10: 1081-1088
7. Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, O'Gara JP (2005) The genetics of staphylococcal biofi lm formation-will a greater understanding of pathogenesis lead to better management of device-related infection? Clin Microbiol Infect 11:967-973
8. Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF et al (1999) The intracellular adhesin ( ica ) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofi lm formation. Infect Immun 67: 5427-5433
9. Beenken KE, Dunman PM, McAleese F et al (2004) Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofi lms. J Bacteriol 186:4665-4684
10. Fitzpatrick F, Humpreys H, O'Gara JP (2005) Evidence for icaADBC-independent biofi lm development mechanism in methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43:1973-1976
11. O'Neill E, Pozzi C, Houston P et al (2007) Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofi lm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections. J Clin Microbiol 45:1379-1388
12. Rice KC, Mann EE, Endres JL et al (2007) The cidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofi lm development in Staphylococcus aureus . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8113-8118
13. Fluckiger U, Ulrich M, Steinhuber A et al (2005) Biofi lm formation, icaADBC transcription, and polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis by staphylococci in a device-related infection model. Infect Immun 73: 1811-1819
14. McKenney D, Pouliot KL, Wang Y et al (1999) Broadly protective vaccine for Staphylococcus aureus based on an in vivo-expressed antigen. Science 284:1523-1527
15. Yao Y, Sturdevandt DE, Otto M (2005) Genome wide analysis of gene expression in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofi lms: insights into the pathophysiology of S. epidermidis biofi lms and the role of phenol-soluble modulins in formation of biofi lms. J Infect Dis 191:289-298
16. Yarwood JM, Bartels DJ, Volper EM et al (2004) Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofi lms. J Bacteriol 186:1838-1850
17. Vuong C, Gerke C, Somerville GA et al (2003) Quorum-sensing control of biofi lm factors in Staphylococcus epidermidis . J Infect Dis 188:706-718
18. Schwartz K, Syed AK, Stephenson RE et al (2012) Functional amyloids composed of phenol soluble modulins stabilize Staphylococcus aureus biofi lms. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002744
19. Boles BR, Thoendel M, Roth AJ et al (2010) Identifi cation of genes involved in polysaccharide-independent Staphylococcus aureus biofi lm formation. PLoS One 5:e10146
20. Mrak LN, Zielenska AK, Beenken KE et al (2012) saeRS and sarA act synergistically to repress protease production and promote biofi lm formation in Staphylococcus aureus . PLoS One 7:e38453
21. Zielenska AK, Beenken KE, Mrak LN et al (2012) sarA-mediated repression of protease production plays a key role in the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus USA300 isolates. Mol Microbiol 86:1183-1196
22. Kolodkin-Gal I, Romero D, Cao S et al (2010) D-amino acids trigger biofi lm disassembly. Science 328:627-629
23. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL et al (1983) Experimental foreign body infections in mice challenged with slime-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis . Infect Immun 40:407-410
24. Rupp ME, Ulphani JS, Fey PD et al (1999) Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin in the pathogenesis of intravascular catheter-associated infection in a rat model. Infect Immun 67:2656-2659
25. Kadurugamuwa JL, Sin L, Albert E et al (2003) Direct continuous method for monitoring biofi lm infection in a mouse model. Infect Immun 71:882-890