A neutral theory with environmental stochasticity explains static and dynamic properties of ecological communities

Ecology Letters

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 572-580

  Kalyuzhny, Michael ^a   Kadmon, Ronen ^a   Shnerb, Nadav M ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

BCI; Community dynamics; Community similarity; Demographic stochasticity; Environmental stochasticity; Fluctuation scaling; Neutral theory; Population fluctuations; Species abundance distributions

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; ECOLOGY; FOREST; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; ECOLOGY; FORESTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84934178181     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12439     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen, A.P. & Savage, V.M. (2007). Setting the absolute tempo of biodiversity dynamics. Ecol. Lett., 10, 637-646.
2. Alonso, D., Etienne, R.S. & McKane, A.J. (2007). Response to Benedetti-Cecchi: neutrality and environmental fluctuations. Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 232.
3. Azaele, S., Pigolotti, S., Banavar, J.R. & Maritan, A. (2006). Dynamical evolution of ecosystems. Nature, 444, 926-928.
4. Chase, J.M. & Myers, J.A. (2011). Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 366, 2351-2363.
5. Chesson, P. (1994). Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theor. Popul. Biol., 45, 227-276.
6. Chesson, P.L. & Warner, R.R. (1981). Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive-systems. Am. Nat., 117, 923-943.
7. Chisholm, R.A. & O'Dwyer, J.P. (2014). Species ages in neutral biodiversity models. Theor. Popul. Biol., 93, 85-94.
8. Chisholm, R.A. & Pacala, S.W. (2010). Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 15821-15825.
9. Chisholm, R.A., Condit, R., Abd Rahman, K., Baker, P.J., Bunyavejchewin, S., Chen, Y.-Y. et al. (2014). Temporal variability of forest communities: empirical estimates of population change in 4000 tree species. Ecol. Lett., 17, 855-865.
10. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R. & Newman, M.E.J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51, 661-703.
11. Condit, R. (1998). Tropical Forest Census Plots: Methods and Results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and a Comparison with Other Plots. Springer-Verlag and R. G. Landes Company, Berlin, Germany, and Georgetown, Texas.
12. Dornelas, M., Connolly, S.R. & Hughes, T.P. (2006). Coral reef diversity refutes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature, 440, 80-82.
13. Dornelas, M., Gotelli, N.J., McGill, B., Shimadzu, H., Moyes, F., Sievers, C. et al. (2014). Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science, 344, 296-299.
14. Etienne, R.S. (2005). A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecol. Lett., 8, 253-260.
15. Feeley, K.J., Davies, S.J., Perez, R., Hubbell, S.P. & Foster, R.B. (2011). Directional changes in the species composition of a tropical forest. Ecology, 92, 871-882.
16. Fuentes, M. (2004). Slight differences among individuals and the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Theor. Popul. Biol., 66, 199-203.
17. Gravel, D., Canham, C.D., Beaudet, M. & Messier, C. (2006). Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecol. Lett., 9, 399-409.
18. Halley, J.M. & Iwasa, Y. (2011). Neutral theory as a predictor of avifaunal extinctions after habitat loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 2316-2321.
19. Holt, R.D. (2006). Emergent neutrality. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 531-533.
20. Hubbell, S.P. (2001). The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
21. Hubbell, S.P., Foster, R.B., O'Brien, S.T., Harms, K.E., Condit, R., Wechsler, B. et al. (1999). Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science, 283, 554-557.
22. Hubbell, S.P., Condit, R. & Foster, R.B. (2005). Barro Colorado Forest Census Plot Data. Available at: https://ctfs.arnarb.harvard.edu/webatlas/datasets/bci. Last accessed 15 January 2012.
23. Hubbell, S.P., He, F., Condit, R., Borda-de-Agua, L., Kellner, J. & ter Steege, H. (2008). How many tree species and how many of them are there in the Amazon will go extinct? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 11498-11504.
24. Hutchinson, G.E. (1961). The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat., 95, 137-145.
25. Kadmon, R. & Allouche, O. (2007). Integrating the effects of area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity on species diversity: a unification of island biogeography and niche theory. Am. Nat., 170, 443-454.
26. Kalyuzhny, M., Schreiber, Y., Chocron, R., Flather, C.H., Kadmon, R., Kessler, D.A. et al. (2014a). Temporal fluctuation scaling in populations and communities. Ecology, 95, 1701-1709.
27. Kalyuzhny, M., Seri, E., Chocron, R., Flather, C.H., Kadmon, R. & Shnerb, N.M. (2014b). Niche versus neutrality: a dynamical analysis. Am. Nat., 184, 439-446.
28. Kampichler, C. & van der Jeugd, H.P. (2013). Determining patterns of variability in ecological communities: time lag analysis revisited. Environ. Ecol. Stat., 20, 271-284.
29. Keitt, T.H. & Stanley, H.E. (1998). Dynamics of North American breeding bird populations. Nature, 393, 257-260.
30. Kessler, D.A. & Shnerb, N.M. (2014). Neutral-like abundance distributions in the presence of selection in a continuous fitness landscape. J. Theor. Biol., 345, 1-11.
31. Kilpatrick, A.M. & Ives, A.R. (2003). Species interactions can explain Taylor's power law for ecological time series. Nature, 422, 65-68.
32. Lande, R., Engen, S. & Saether, B.-E. (2003). Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
33. Lawton, J.H. (1999). Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 84, 177-192.
34. Leigh, E.G. (1981). The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. J. Theor. Biol., 90, 213-239.
35. MacArthur, R. & Levins, R. (1967). The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat., 101, 377-385.
36. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
37. McGill, B.J. (2003). A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature, 422, 881-885.
38. Nee, S. (2005). The neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? Funct. Ecol., 19, 173-176.
39. O'Dwyer, J.P. & Chisholm, R. (2014). A mean field model for competition: from neutral ecology to the Red Queen. Ecol. Lett., 17, 961-969.
40. Purves, D.W. & Turnbull, L.A. (2010). Different but equal: the implausible assumption at the heart of neutral theory. J. Anim. Ecol., 79, 1215-1225.
41. Ricklefs, R.E. (2006). The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up? Ecology, 87, 1424-1431.
42. Rosindell, J., Cornell, S.J., Hubbell, S.P. & Etienne, R.S. (2010). Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett., 13, 716-727.
43. Seri, E., Maruvka, Y.E. & Shnerb, N.M. (2012). Neutral dynamics and cluster statistics in a tropical forest. Am. Nat., 180, E161-E173.
44. Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
45. Tilman, D. (2004). Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 10854-10861.
46. Ulrich, W., Ollik, M. & Ugland, K.I. (2010). A meta-analysis of species-abundance distributions. Oikos, 119, 1149-1155.
47. Usinowicz, J., Wright, S.J. & Ives, A.R. (2012). Coexistence in tropical forests through asynchronous variation in annual seed production. Ecology, 93, 2073-2084.
48. Volkov, I., Banavar, J.R., Hubbell, S.P. & Maritan, A. (2003). Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature, 424, 1035-1037.
49. Zhang, D.Y. & Lin, K. (1997). The effects of competitive asymmetry on the rate of competitive displacement: how robust is Hubbell's community drift model? J. Theor. Biol., 188, 361-367.