Species ages in neutral biodiversity models

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 93, Issue , 2014, Pages 85-94

  Chisholm, Ryan A ^a   O'Dwyer, James P ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Biogeography; Neutral molecular evolution; Neutral theory; Population genetics; Species ages

Indexed keywords

AGE DETERMINATION; ANALYTICAL METHOD; BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; DATING METHOD; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENE EXPRESSION; PERSISTENCE; POPULATION MODELING; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TREE;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; NEUTRAL GENE THEORY; NEUTRAL MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES AGES;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOGRAPHY; NEUTRAL MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NEUTRAL THEORY; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES AGES;

BIODIVERSITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84896525707     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2014.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables 1972, Dover, New York.
2. Allen A.P., Savage V.M. Setting the absolute tempo of biodiversity dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:637-646.
3. Alonso D., McKane A.J. Sampling hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:901-910.
4. Chesson P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000, 31:343-366.
5. Chisholm, R.A., Condit, R., et al., 0000. Temporal variability of forest communities: empirical estimates of population change in 4000 species (in review).
6. Condit R., Ashton P.S., Manokaran N., LaFrankie J.V., Hubbell S.P., Foster R.B. Dynamics of the forest communities at pasoh and Barro Colorado: comparing two 50-ha plots. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 1999, 354:1739-1748.
7. Condit R., Chisholm R.A., Hubbell S.P. Thirty years of forest census at Barro Colorado and the importance of immigration in maintaining diversity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e49826.
8. Fisher R.A., Corbet A.S., Williams C.B. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 1943, 12:42-58.
9. Hubbell S.P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography 2001, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Kimura M., Ohta T. Age of a neutral mutant persisting in a finite population. Genetics 1973, 75:199-212.
12. Lande R., Engen S., Saether B.E. Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
13. Leigh E.G. Neutral theory: a historical perspective. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:2075-2091.
14. Leigh E.G., Davidar P., Dick C.W., Puyravaud J.P., Terborgh J., Ter Steege H., Wright S.J. Why do some tropical forests have so many species of trees?. Biotropica 2004, 36:447-473.
15. Nee S. The neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up?. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:173-176.
16. O'Dwyer J.P., Green J.L. Field theory for biogeography: a spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:87-95.
17. Ricklefs R.E. A comment on hubbell's zero-sum ecological drift model. Oikos 2003, 100:185.
18. Rosindell J., Cornell S.J., Hubbell S.P., Etienne R.S. Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:716-727.
19. Rosindell J., Hubbell S.P., Etienne R.S. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 1384.
20. Vallade M., Houchmandzadeh B. Analytical solution of a neutral model of biodiversity. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 68.
21. Volkov I., Banavar J.R., Hubbell S.P., Maritan A. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 2003, 424:1035-1037.