Dynamic social power modulates neural basis of math calculation

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue DEC, 2012, Pages

  Harada, Tokiko ^a   Bridge, Donna J ^a   Chiao, Joan Y ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECISION MAKING; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL GYRUS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SOCIAL ASPECT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84933677345     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00350     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aron, A.R., Robbins, T.W. & Poldrack, R.A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 170-177.
2. Ashcraft, M.H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75-106.
3. Beilock, S., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136, 256-276.
4. Brett, M., Johnsrude, I.S., Owen, A.M. (2002). The problem of functional localization in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3 (3), 243-9.
5. Cheon, B.K., Im, D., Harada, T., Kim, J., Mathur, V.A., Scimeca, J.M., Parrish, T.B., Park, H., Chiao, J.Y. (2011). Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. Neuroimage, 57(2), 642-50.
6. Chiao, J.Y., Harada, T., Oby, E.R., Li, Z., Parrish, T., Bridge, D.J. (2009a). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 354-63.
7. Chiao, J.Y., Mathur, V.A., Harada, T., Lipke, T. (2009b). Neural basis of preference for human social hierarchy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 174-81.
8. Chiao, J.Y. (2010). Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20 (6), 803-9.
9. Cohen-Kadosh, R., Lammertyn, J., Izard, V. (2008). Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. Progress in Neurobiology, 84 (2), 132-147.
10. College Board. (2009). 2009 college-bound seniors: Total group profile report. New York, NY.
11. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
12. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
13. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavior and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
14. Friston, K.J., Holmes, A.P., Price, C.J., Buchel, C., Worsley, K.J. (1999). Multisubject FMRI studies and conjunction analyses. NeuroImage, 10, 385-396.
15. Galinsky, A.D., Gruenfeld, D.H, & Magee, J.C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
16. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
17. Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (8), 1076-87.
18. Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455 (7213), 665-668.
19. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
20. Krendl, A., Richeson, J.A., Kelley, W.M., Heatherton, T.F. (2008). The negative consequences of threat: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women's underperformance in math. Psychological Science, 19 (2), 168-75.
21. LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., & Mrkonjic, L. (1988). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for obligatory activation of arithmetic facts. Memory & Cognition, 16, 45-53.
22. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
23. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.
24. Smith, P. K., Jostmann, N. B., Galinsky, A. D., & Van Dijk, W. W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 351-398.
25. Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., Quinn, D.M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
26. Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., van de Moortele, P., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., Dehaene, S. (2000). Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: a brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. Brain, 123 (11), 2240-2255.
27. Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Thieme Medical Publishers: New York, NY.
28. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education 2006, NCES 2006-071, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.