Conceptual Implicit Memory and the Item-Specific-Relational Distinction

Distinctiveness and Memory

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Mulligan, Neil W ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Distinctiveness; Explicit memory; Functional dissociations; Implicit memory; Item specific processing; Memory tests; Priming; Relational processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933474551     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169669.003.0009     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Begg, I., Snider, A., Foley, F., & Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 977-989.
2. Burns, D. J. (1993). Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 163-173.
3. Burns, D. J. (1996). The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 567- 580.
4. Cabeza, R. (1994). A dissociation between two implicit conceptual tests supports the distinction between types of conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 505-508.
5. Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., & McDowd, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 864-875.
6. Curran, H. V. (2000). Psychopharmacological perspectives on memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 539-554). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Denny, E. B., & Hunt, R. R. (1992). Affective valence and memory in depression: Dissociation of recall and fragment completion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 575- 580.
8. de Winstanley, P. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1997). Processing instructions and the generation effect: A test of the multifactor transfer-appropriate processing theory. Memory, 5, 401- 421.
9. Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 87-115.
10. Gabrieli, J. D. E., Vaidya, C. J., Stone, M., Francis, W. S., Thompson-Schill, S. L., Fleischman, D. A., Tinklenberg, J. R., Yesavage, J. A., & Wilson, R. S. (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 479-498.
11. Gardiner, J. M., & Hampton, J. A. (1988). Item-specific processing and the generation effect: Support for a distinctiveness account. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 495- 504.
12. Geraci, L., & Rajaram, S. (2002). The orthographic distinctiveness effect on direct and indirect tests of memory: Delineating the awareness and processing requirements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 273-291.
13. Hamann, S. B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 970-977.
14. Hamilton, M., & Rajaram, S. (2001). The concreteness effect in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 96-117.
15. Hirshman, E., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 484- 494.
16. Hirshman, E., & Jackson, E. (1997). Distinctive perceptual processing and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 2-12.
17. Hirshman, E., & Mulligan, N. W. (1991). Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 507-513.
18. Hirshman, E., Trembath, D., & Mulligan, N. W. (1994). Theoretical implications of the mnemonic benefits of perceptual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 608-620.
19. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 497-514.
20. Hunt, R. R., & Elliott, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49-74.
21. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory & Language., 32, 421-445.
22. Hunt, R. R., & Smith, R. E. (1996). Accessing the particular from the general: The power of distinctiveness in the context of organization. Memory & Cognition, 24, 217-225.
23. Hunt, R. R., & Toth, J. P. (1990). Perceptual identification, fragment completion, and free recall: Concepts and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 282-290.
24. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667.
25. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
26. Kinoshita, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 563-571.
27. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Aseron, R. (1989). Effects of item specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1192-1197.
28. Light, L. L. (1991). Memory and aging: Four hypotheses in search of data. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 333-376.
29. Light, L. L., & Albertson, S. A. (1989). Direct and indirect tests of memory for category exemplars in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 487-492.
30. Maki, P. M., & Knopman, D. S. (1996). Limitations of the distinction between conceptual and perceptual implicit memory: A study of Alzheimer's disease. Psychology and Aging, 10, 464-474.
31. Mandler, J. M. (1979). Categorical and schematic organization in memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.), Memory organization and structure (pp. 259-299). New York: Academic Press.
32. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., DeLosh, E. L., May, C. P., & Brady, P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It's not surprising, it's complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 422-435.
33. McDaniel, M. A., Moore, B. A., & Whiteman, H. L. (1998). Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 173-185.
34. McDaniel, M. A., & Wadill, P. J. (1990). Generation effects for context words: Implications for item-specific and multifactor theories. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 201-211.
35. McDaniel, M. A., Wadill, P. J., & Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 521-536.
36. McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (1996). Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: Problems for transfer appropriate processing theory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 57-71.
37. McElroy, L. A., & Slamecka, N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 243-259.
38. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
39. Mulligan, N. W. (1996). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1067-1087.
40. Mulligan, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding on implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 27- 47.
41. Mulligan, N. W. (1999). The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 54-69.
42. Mulligan, N. W. (2000a). Perceptual interference and memory for order. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 680-697.
43. Mulligan, N. W. (2000b). Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests. Memory & Cognition, 28, 539-546.
44. Mulligan, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 436-450.
45. Mulligan, N. W. (2002). The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 327-342.
46. Mulligan, N. W. (2003). Memory: Implicit versus explicit. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 1114-1120). London: Nature Publishing Group/Macmillan.
47. Mulligan, N. W., Guyer, S., & Beland, A. (1999). The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual priming. Memory & Cognition, 27, 633-647.
48. Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition, 24, 453-465.
49. Mulligan, N. W., & Stone, M. V. (1999). Attention and conceptual priming: Limits on the effects of divided attention in the category-exemplar production task. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 253-280.
50. Nairne, J. S. (1988). The mnemonic value of perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 244-255.
51. Nairne, J. S., Reigler, G. L., & Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 702-709.
52. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
53. Rappold, V. A., & Hashtroudi, S. (1991). Does organization improve priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 103-114.
54. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
55. Roediger, H. L., & Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Memory and cognitive processes: The Ebbinghaus centennial conference (pp. 349-379). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Roediger, H. L., Buckner, R. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1999). Components of processing. In J. K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Systems, process, or function (pp. 31-65). New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
58. Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. A., & Reigler, G. H. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1251-1269.
59. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
60. Schacter, D. L., & Badgaiyan, R. D. (2001). Neuroimaging of priming: New perspectives on implicit and explicit memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 1-4.
61. Schwartz, B. L., Rosse, R. B., & Deutsch, S. I. (1993). Limits of the processing view in accounting for dissociations among memory measures in a clinical population. Memory and Cognition, 21, 63-72.
62. Shimamura, A. P. (1993). Neuropsychological analyses of implicit memory: History, methodology, and theoretical interpretations. In P. Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: New directions in Cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 265-285). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
64. Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 589-607.
65. Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The effects of distinctiveness require reinstatement of organization: The importance of intentional memory instructions. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 431-446.
66. Srinivas, K., & Roediger, H. L. (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 389-412.
67. Vaidya, C. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Keane, M. M., Monti, L. A., Gutierrez-Rivas, H., & Zarella, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1324- 1343.
68. Weldon, M. S., & Coyote, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 670-686.
69. Westerman, D. L., & Greene, R. L. (1997). The effects of visual masking on recognition: Similarities to the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 584-596.