Perceptual Interference and Memory for Order

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 680-697

  Mulligan, Neil W ^a  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Long term memory; order memory; perceptual interference effect; memory encoding

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000873417     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2721     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Balota D. A. The role of meaning in word recognition. Balota D. A., Arcais G. B. F. d., Rayner K. Comprehension processes in reading. 1990;Erlbaum, Hillside.
2. Burns D. J. Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 19:1993;163-173.
3. Burns D. J. The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology. 109:1996;567-580.
4. Burns D. J., Curti E. T., Lavin J. C. The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall. Memory & Cognition. 21:1993;846-852.
5. Carr T. H., Dagenbach D. Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 16:1990;341-350.
6. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988;Erlbaum, Hillside.
7. DeLosh E. L., McDaniel M. A. The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 22:1996;1136-1146.
8. Engelkamp J., Zimmer H. D. The human memory: A multi-modal approach. 1994;Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle.
9. Graf P. The memorial consequences of generation and transformation. Journal of Verbal and Learning and Verbal Behavior. 21:1982;539-548.
10. Graf P., Ryan L. Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 16:1990;978-992.
11. Gardiner J. M., Gregg V. H., Hampton J. A. Word frequency and generation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 14:1988;687-693.
12. Greene R. L. Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. 1992;Erlbaum, Hillside.
13. Greene R. L., Thapar A., Westerman D. L. Effects of generation on memory for order. Journal of Memory and Language. 38:1998;255-264.
14. Hirshman E., Mulligan N. W. Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 17:1991;507-513.
15. Hirshman E., Snodgrass J. G., Mindes J., Feenan K. Conceptual priming in fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 16:1990;634-647.
16. Hirshman E., Trembath D., Mulligan N. W. Theoretical implications of the mnemonic benefits of perceptual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 20:1994;608-620.
17. Hunt R. R., Einstein G. O. Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 19:1981;497-514.
18. Hunt R. R., McDaniel M. A. The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language. 32:1993;421-445.
19. Klein S. B., Loftus J., Kihlstrom J. F., Aseron R. Effects of item specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 15:1989;1192-1197.
20. Kucera H., Francis W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. 1967;Brown Univ. Press, Providence.
21. Lewandowsky S., Murdock B. B. Memory for serial order. Psychological Review. 96:1989;25-57.
22. Li S. C., Lewandowsky S. Intralist distractors and recall direction: Constraints on models of memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 19:1993;895-908.
23. Li S. C., Lewandowsky S. Forward and backward recall: Different retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 21:1995;837-847.
24. Masson M. E. J., Sala L. Interactive processes in sentence comprehension and reading. Cognitive Psychology. 10:1978;244-270.
25. McDaniel M. A., Moore B. A., Whiteman H. L. Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 24:1998;173-185.
26. McElroy L. A., Slamecka N. J. Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 21:1982;243-259.
27. Mulligan N. W. The Effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 22:1996;1067-1087.
28. Mulligan N. W. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances recall for high- but not low-imageability words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 5:1998;464-469.
29. Mulligan N. W. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: Investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 25:1999a;54-69.
30. Mulligan, 1999b, Generation and hypermnesia. Manuscript submitted for publication.
31. Mulligan, N. W. in press, Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: Evidence from multiple recall tests, Memory & Cognition.
32. Mulligan N. W., Guyer S., Beland A. The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual priming. Memory & Cognition. 27:1999;633-647.
33. Nairne J. S. The mnemonic value of perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 14:1988;244-255.
34. Nairne J. S., Pusen C. P., Widner R. L. Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect. Memory & Cognition. 13:1985;183-191.
35. Nairne J. S., Reigler G. L., Serra M. Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 17:1991;702-709.
36. Nairne J. S., Widner R. L. Familiarity and lexicality as determinants of the generation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 14:1988;694-699.
37. Olofsson U. Win some, lose some: Hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing. Memory & Cognition. 25:1997;797-800.
38. Payne D. G. Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin. 101:1987;5-27.
39. Plaut D. C., McClelland J. L., Seidenberg M. S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review. 103:1996;56-115.
40. Seidenberg M. S., McClelland J. L. A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review. 96:1989;523-568.
41. Serra M., Nairne J. S. Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition. 21:1993;34-40.
42. Srinivas K., Roediger H. L. Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory and Language. 29:1990;389-412.
43. Strain E., Patterson K., Seidenberg M. S. Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 21:1995;1140-1154.
44. Weldon M. S., Coyote K. C. Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 22:1996;670-686.
45. Westerman D. L., Greene R. L. The effects of visual masking on recognition: Similarities to the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language. 37:1997;584-596.