CO2 capture and reduction to liquid fuels in a novel electrochemical setup by using metal-doped conjugated microporous polymers

Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 701-713

  Ampelli, Claudio ^a   Genovese, Chiara ^a   Errahali, Mina ^b   Gatti, Giorgio ^b   Marchese, Leonardo ^b   Perathoner, Siglinda ^a   Centi, Gabriele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

CO2 reduction; Conjugated microporous polymers (CMP); Pt and Fe nanoparticles; Solar fuels

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COLD WORKING; DIFFUSION IN GASES; ELECTROCATALYSTS; ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICES; GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LIQUID FUELS; LIQUIDS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; METALS; MICROPOROSITY; REDUCTION; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS;

CO2 REDUCTION; CONJUGATED MICROPOROUS POLYMERS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; FE NANOPARTICLES; GAS DIFFUSION LAYERS; HOMOCOUPLING REACTIONS; SELECTIVE MEMBRANES; SOLAR FUELS;

CONJUGATED POLYMERS;

EID: 84933179098     PISSN: 0021891X     EISSN: 15728838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-015-0847-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. 2. In: (Eds.) NZMaTNV (ed) Carbon-neutral fuels and energy carriers. Series: green chemistry and chemical engineering. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis group), Boca Raton, FL (US), pp 291–323
2. Genovese C, Ampelli C, Perathoner S, Centi G (2013) A Gas-phase electrochemical reactor for carbon dioxide reduction back to liquid fuels. Chem Eng Tran 32:289–294. doi:10.3303/CET1332049
3. Songolzadeh M, Soleimani M, Takht Ravanchi M, Songolzadeh R (2014) Carbon dioxide separation from flue gases: a technological review emphasizing reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Sci World J 2014:828131. doi:10.1155/2014/828131
4. Leung DYC, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer MM (2014) An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39:426–443. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093
5. Huck JM, Lin L-C, Berger AH, Shahrak MN, Martin RL, Bhown AS, Haranczyk M, Reuter K, Smit B (2014) Evaluating different classes of porous materials for carbon capture. Energy Environ Sci. doi:10.1039/C4EE02636E
6. Yang L, Wang H (2014) Recent advances in carbon dioxide capture, fixation, and activation by using n-heterocyclic carbenes. Chem Sus Chem 7(4):962–998. doi:10.1002/cssc.201301131
7. 2 on carbon nanotube-based electrodes for producing solar fuels. J Catal 308:237–249. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.08.026
8. Ampelli C, Centi G, Passalacqua R, Perathoner S (2010) Synthesis of solar fuels by a novel photoelectrocatalytic approach. Energy Environ Sci 3(3):292–301. doi:10.1039/B925470f
9. 2 reduction in gas phase by using conductive polymer based electrocatalysts. Chem Eng Trans 41:13–18. doi:10.3303/CET1441003
10. Herron JA, Kim J, Upadhye AA, Hubera GW, Maravelias CT (2014) A general framework for the assessment of solar fuel technologies. Energy Environ Sci. doi:10.1039/C4EE01958J
11. Ampelli C, Genovese C, Passalacqua R, Perathoner S, Centi G (2012) The use of a solar photoelectrochemical reactor for sustainable production of energy. Theor Found Chem Eng 46(6):651–657. doi:10.1134/S0040579512060012
12. 2 production by water splitting. Chem Eng Trans 24:187–192. doi:10.3303/Cet1124032
13. 2 thin films: evidence for a multiparameter dependent photocurrent-structure relationship. Nanosci Nanotechnol Lett 4(2):142–148. doi:10.1166/nn1.2012.1303
14. Errahali M, Gatti G, Tei L, Canti L, Fraccarollo A, Cossi M, Marchese L (2014) Understanding methane adsorption in porous aromatic frameworks: an FTIR, Raman, and theoretical combined study. J Phys Chem C 118(19):10053–10060. doi:10.1021/jp412572e
15. 2 nanocomposites. Chem Eng Trans 35:583–588. doi:10.3303/CET1335097
16. 2 nanocomposites. RSC Adv 3(44):21776–21788. doi:10.1039/C3ra22804e
17. 2 adsorption behavior of microwave synthesized zeolite beta. Mater Lett 108:106–109. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.088
18. Auta M, Hameed BH (2014) Adsorption of carbon dioxide by diethanolamine activated alumina beads in a fixed bed. Chem Eng J 253:350–355. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.018
19. 2 capture with the HKUST-1 and MIL-101(Cr) metal–organic frameworks: adsorption, separation and regeneration investigations. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 179:191–197. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.007
20. 2 capture from postcombustion gas: a multi-scale computational study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16(29):15189–15198. doi:10.1039/c4cp02047b
21. Ben T, Qiu S (2013) Porous aromatic frameworks: synthesis, structure and functions. CrystEngComm 15(1):17–26. doi:10.1039/c2ce25409c
22. Fraccarollo A, Canti L, Marchese L, Cossi M (2014) Monte carlo modeling of carbon dioxide adsorption in porous aromatic frameworks. Langmuir 30:4147–4156
23. 2 capture and conversion using Mg-MOF-74 prepared by a sonochemical method. Energy Environ Sci 5:6465–6473. doi:10.1039/c1ee02234b
24. Liu X, Li H, Zhang Y, Xu B, Sigen A, Xia H, Mu Y (2013) Enhanced carbon dioxide uptake by metalloporphyrin-based microporous covalent triazine framework. Polym Chem 4(8):2445–2448. doi:10.1039/c3py00083d
25. Xu Y, Chen L, Guo Z, Nagai A, Jiang D (2011) Light-emitting conjugated polymers with microporous network architecture: interweaving scaffold promotes electronic conjugation, facilitates exciton migration, and improves luminescence. J Am Chem Soc 133(44):17622–17625. doi:10.1021/ja208284t
26. Xu Y, Jin S, Xu H, Nagai A, Jiang D (2013) Conjugated microporous polymers: design, synthesis and application. Chem Soc Rev 42(20):8012–8031. doi:10.1039/c3cs60160a
27. 2 at ambient conditions by a conjugated microporous polymer. Nature Commun 4:1960. doi:10.1038/ncomms2960
28. 2 sorption in robust nanoporous organic polymers. Chem Sci 2:1173–1177. doi:10.1039/c1sc00100k
29. Demir-Cakan R, Morcrette M, Nouar F, Davoisne C, Devic T, Gonbeau D, Dominko R, Serre C, Ferey G, Tarascon J-M (2011) Cathode Composites for Li–S batteries via the use of oxygenated porous architectures. J Am Chem Soc 133(40):16154–16160. doi:10.1021/ja2062659
30. 2 to liquid fuels using nanocarbon-based electrodes. J Energy Chem 22(2):202–213
31. Ampelli C, Passalacqua R, Genovese C, Perathoner S, Centi G (2011) A novel photo-electrochemical approach for the chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to fuels. Chem Eng Trans 25:683–688. doi:10.3303/Cet1125114
32. 2 Thin films: relationship between preparation conditions and nanostructure. Top Catal 50(1–4):133–144. doi:10.1007/s11244-008-9113-0
33. 2 production by water photo-electrolysis. Chem Eng Trans 17:1011–1016. doi:10.3303/Cet0917169
34. Kuhl KP, Cave ER, Abram DN, Jaramillo TF (2012) New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ Sci 5(5):7050. doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j
35. 2 production. Appl Therm Eng 70(2):1270–1275. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.04.013
36. 2 to formate at high current density using gas diffusion electrodes. J Appl Electrochem 44(10):1107–1116. doi:10.1007/s10800-014-0731-x
37. Wang Q, Dong H, Yu H, Yu H (2015) Enhanced performance of gas diffusion electrode for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate by adding polytetrafluoroethylene into catalyst layer. J Power Sources 279:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.118
38. 2 utilization: an enabling element to move to a resource and energy-efficient chemical and fuel production. Phil Trans R Soc A 373(20140177):1–35. doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0177
39. Qiao J, Liu Y, Hong F, Zhang J (2014) A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels. Chem Soc Rev 43:631–675. doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g
40. Wang D, Villa A, Porta F, Su D, Prati L (2006) Single-phase bimetallic system for the selective oxidation of glycerol to glycerate. Chem Commun 18:1956–1958. doi:10.1039/B518069D
41. Freund H-J, Roberts MW (1996) Surface chemistry of carbon dioxide. Surf Sci Rep 25(8):225–273. doi:10.1016/S0167-5729(96)00007-6
42. Fastow M, Kozirovski Y, Folman M (1993) IR spectra of CO2 and N2O adsorbed on C60 and other carbon allotropes—a comparative study. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 64–65(C):843–848. doi:10.1016/0368-2048(93)80158-I
43. 3 surfaces. Langmuir 15(14):4789–4795. doi:10.1021/la981440v
44. Kazarian SG, Vincent MF, Bright FV, Liotta CL, Eckert CA (1996) Specific intermolecular interaction of carbon dioxide with polymers. J Am Chem Soc 118(7):1729–1736. doi:10.1021/ja950416q
45. 2 in Carbon Nanotube Bundles. J Phys Chem B 107(47):12930–12941
46. 2 reduction on metal electrodes. In: Constantinos G, Vayenas C, White RE, Gamboa-Aldeco ME (eds) Modern aspects of electrochemistry, vol 42. Springer, New York, pp 89–189. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49489-0_3
47. Ampelli C, Perathoner S, Centi G (2014) Carbon-based catalysts: opening new scenario to develop next-generation nano-engineered catalytic materials. Chin J Catal 35(6):783–791. doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60139-X
48. Gangeri M, Perathoner S, Caudo S, Centi G, Amadou J, Bégin D, Pham-Huu C, Ledoux MJ, Tessonnier JP, Su DS (2009) Fe and Pt carbon nanotubes for the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to oxygenates. Catal Today 143(1–2):57–63. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.11.001