Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance

Climate Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 167-186

  Korhonen Kurki, Kaisa ^a,b   Sehring, Jenniver ^a   Brockhaus, Maria ^a   Di Gregorio, Monica ^c  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

climate change mitigation; developing countries; policy formation; QCA

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEFORESTATION; DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; FINANCIAL SYSTEM; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; LAND DEGRADATION; POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLLUTION TAX;

EID: 84890991823     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.852022     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D., & Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (Eds.). (2009). Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. Bogor: CIFOR.
2. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W. D., & Verchot, L. (Eds.). (2012). Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. Bogor: CIFOR.
3. Angelsen, A., & McNeil, D. (2012). The Evolution of REDD+. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, & L. Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices (pp. 3150-30). Bogor: CIFOR.
4. Arts, B. (2012). Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.003
5. Barr, C., Dermawan, A., Purnomo, H., & Komarudin, H. (2010). Financial governance and Indonesia's Reforestation Fund during the Soeharto and post-Soeharto periods, 1989-2009: A political economic analysis of lessons for REDD+ (CIFOR Occasional Paper 52). Bogor: CIFOR.
6. Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Wilkerson, J. (2011). Comparative studies of policy dynamics. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 947-972. doi: 10.1177/0010414011405160
7. Brockhaus, M., & Di Gregorio, M. (2012). A brief overview: Component 1 on national REDD+ policies and processes (CIFOR Infobrief 13). Bogor: CIFOR.
8. Brockhaus, M., & Angelsen, A. (2012). Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: A political economy framework. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, & L. Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices (pp. 15-30). Bogor: CIFOR.
9. Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., & Mardiah, S. (2013). Governing the design of national REDD +: An analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics. Retrieved August 17, 2013, from doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.003
10. Caplow, S., Jagger, P., Lawlor, K., & Sills, E. (2011). Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of early forest carbon projects: Lessons for learning about REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 152-167. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.003
11. Cerbu, G., Swallow, B., & Thompson, D. (2011). Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 168-180. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.007
12. Clements, T. (2010). Reduced expectations: The political and institutional challenges of REDD+. Oryx, 44, 309-310. doi: 10.1017/S0030605310000712
13. Corbera, E., & Schroeder, H. (2011). Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002
14. Cronqvist, L. (2007). Tosmana - Tool for Small-N Analysis (Version 1.3). Marburg: Tosmana. Retrieved from http://www.tosmana.net/tosmana_manual1_3beta.pdf
15. Dai, X. (2007). International institutions and national policies. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
16. Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Cronin, T., & Muharrom, E. (2012). Politics and power in national REDD+ policy processes. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, & L. Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices (pp. 69-90). Bogor: CIFOR.
17. Fosci, M. (2013). The economic case for prioritizing governance over financial incentives in REDD+. Climate Policy, 13, 170-190. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.745112
18. Fry, B. P. (2011). Community forest monitoring in REDD+: The 'M' in MRV? Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.004
19. Gobierno de Bolivia. (2008). Climate change: Save the planet from capitalism (Letter from Evo Morales Ayma, President of Bolivia, to the United Nations, 28 November. La Paz, Bolivia).
20. Gupta, J. (2012). Glocal forest and REDD+ governance: Win-win or lose-lose? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 620-627. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.014
21. Hajek, F., Ventresca, M., Scriven, J., & Castro, A. (2011). Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence from a cluster of local initiatives in south-eastern Peru. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 201-215. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.007
22. Hiraldo, R., & Tanner, T. (2011). Forest voices: Competing narratives over REDD. IDS Bulletin, 42, 42-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00221.x
23. Indrarto, G. B., Muharjanti, P., Khatarina, J., Pulungan, I., Ivalerina, F., Rahman, J., Muharrom, E. (2012). The context of REDD+ in Indonesia: Drivers, agents and institutions. Jakarta and Bogor: ICEL and CIFOR.
24. Kanninen, M., Murdiyarso, D., Seymour, F., Angelsen, A., Wunder, S., & German, L. (2007). Do trees grow on money? The implications of deforestation research for policies to promote REDD+. Bogor: CIFOR.
25. Lederer, M. (2012). REDD+ governance. WIREs Climate Change, 3, 107-113. doi: 10.1002/wcc.155
26. Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
27. Mannewitz, T. (2011). Two-level theories in QCA: A discussion of Schneider and Wagemann's two-step approach (COMPASSS Working Paper 2011-64). Retrieved from http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/Mannewitz2011.pdf
28. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Pedroni, L., Dutschke, M., Streck, C., & Estrada Porrúa, M. (2009). Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: The nested approach. Climate Policy, 9, 207-220. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0522
31. Peskett, L., Schreckenberg, K., & Brown, J. (2011). Institutional approaches for carbon financing in the forest sector: Learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 216-229. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.004
32. Pham, T. T., Moeliono, M., Hien, N. T., Tho, N. H., & Hien, V. T. (2012). The context of REDD+ in Vietnam: Drivers, agents and institutions. Bogor: CIFOR and Central Institute for Economic Management.
33. Phelps, J., Guerrero, M. J., Dalabajan, D. A., Young, B., & Webb, E. L. (2010). What makes a 'REDD' country? Global Environmental Change, 20, 322-332. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.002
34. Phelps, J., Webb, E., & Agrawal, A. (2010). Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science, 328, 312-313. doi: 10.1126/science.1187774
35. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251-267. doi: 10.2307/2586011
36. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37. Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. Reinecke, S., Pistorius, T., & Pregernig, M. (2012). UNFCCC and the REDD+ partnership from a networked governance perspective. Environmental Science & Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.015
40. Rihoux, B. (2007). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques: Recent advances and challenges. In S. Pickel, G. Pickel, H.-J. Lauth, & D. Jahn (Eds.), Methoden der Vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft. Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen [Methods of comparative political and social science. New developments and applications] (pp. 365-385). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
41. Rihoux, B., & de Meur, G. (2009). Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 33-68). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
42. Rihoux, B., & C. C. Ragin. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
43. Romijn, E., Herold, M., Kooistra, L., Murdiyarso, D., & Verchot, L. (2012). Assessing capacities of non-Annex I countries for national forest monitoring in the context of REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy, 19, 33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.005
44. Scharpf, F. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45. Scharpf, F. (2000). Institutions in comparative policy research. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 762-790. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300604
46. Schneider, C. C., & Wagemann, C. (2006). Reducing complexity in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy. European Journal of Political Science Research, 45, 751-786. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00635.x
47. Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences. A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Simon, H. (1955). A behavorial model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118. doi: 10.2307/1884852
49. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369-404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
50. Victor, D., Raustiala, K., & Skonikoff, E. (Eds.). (1998). The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., & Angelsen, A. (2009). Global and national REDD+ architecture: Linking institutions and actions. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, M. Kanninen, E. Sills, W. D. Sunderlin, & S. Wertz-Kanounnikoff (Eds.), Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options (pp. 13-24). Bogor: CIFOR.
52. Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., & McNeill, D. (2012). Performance indicators and REDD+ implementation. In A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, & L. Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices (pp. 233-246). Bogor: CIFOR.
53. Wong, G., & Surkin, J. (2008). A changing landscape (Report). Barcelona: IUCN Conservation Workshop.