A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes

NeuroImage

Volumn 117, Issue , 2015, Pages 439-448

  Colclough, G L ^a,b   Brookes, M J ^c   Smith, S M ^a   Woolrich, M W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA RHYTHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONNECTOME; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; KERNEL METHOD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTING STATE NETWORK; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TEMPORAL LOBE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTOME; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE NET; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84933060053     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.071     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baccala L.A., Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol. Cybern. 2001, 84(6):463-474.
2. Baker A.P., et al. Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity. eLIFE 2014, 3:e01867.
3. Beckmann C.F., et al. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360:1001-1013.
4. Brookes M.J., et al. Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:16783-16788.
5. Brookes M.J., et al. Measuring functional connectivity in MEG: a multivariate approach insensitive to linear source leakage. NeuroImage 2012, 63(2):910-920.
6. Brookes M.J., et al. Task induced modulation of neural oscialtions in electrophysiological brain networks. NeuroImage 2012, 63(4):1918-1930.
7. Brookes M.J., et al. Measuring temporal, spectral and spatial changes in electrophysiological brain network connectivity. NeuroImage 2014, 91:282-299.
8. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. 2nd edition.
9. de Pasquale F., et al. Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107(13):6040-6045.
10. Duff E., et al. Utility of partial correlation for characterising brain dynamics: MVPA-based assessment of regularisation and network selection. Proceedings- 2013 3rd International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging 2013, 58-61. (PRNI 2013).
11. Duncan D., et al. Intracranial EEG evaluation of relationship within a resting state network. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 124(10):1943-1951.
12. Everson R. Orthogonal, but not orthonormal, procrustes problems, Imperial College Technical Report TR99-6 1999, (Available at http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/reverson/uploads/Site/procrustes.pdf[accessed 11 August 2014]).
13. Friedman J., et al. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 2008, 9(3):432-441.
14. Friston K.J., et al. Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage 2003, 19:1273-1302.
15. Gross J., et al. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:694-699.
16. Hillebrand A., et al. Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: an atlas-basedMEG beamformer solution. NeuroImage 2012, 59:3909-3921.
17. Hipp J.F., et al. Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15(6):884-890.
18. Huang M.X., et al. A sensor-weightedoverlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Phys. Med. Biol. 1999, 44(2):423-440.
19. Hyvärinen A. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1999, 10(3):626-634.
20. Jenkinson M., et al. FSL. NeuroImage 2012, 62:782-790.
21. Kaminski M., Blinowska K.J. Directed transfer function is not influenced by volume conduction-inexpedient pre-processing should be avoided. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2014, 8:61.
22. Löwdin P.-O. On the nonorthogonality problem connected with the use of atomic wave functions in the theory of molecules and crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18:365-375.
23. Luckhoo H., et al. Inferring task-related networks using independent component analysis in magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 2012, 62:530-541.
24. Maldjian J.A., et al. Graph theoretical analysis of resting-stateMEG data: identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode. NeuroImage 2014, 96:88-94.
25. Mantini D., et al. A signal-processing pipeline for magnetoencephalography resting-state networks. Brain Connect. 2011, 1(1):49-59.
26. Marrelec G., et al. Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI. NeuroImage 2006, 32(228-237).
27. Marzetti L., et al. Frequency specific interactions of MEG resting state activity within and across brain networks as revealed by the multivariate interaction measure. NeuroImage 2013, 79:172-183.
28. Mazumder R., Hastie T. Exact covariance thresholding into connected components for large-scale graphical lasso. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012, 13:723-726.
29. Mazumder R., Hastie T. The graphical lasso: new insights and alternatives. Electron. J. Stat. 2012, 6:2125-2149.
30. Ninness B., et al. The University of Newcastle Identification Toolbox (UNIT). IFAC World Congress 2005, 1-6.
31. Nolte G., et al. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG using the imaginary part of coherency. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:2292-2307.
32. Oostenveld R., et al. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011:156869.
33. Palva S., Palva J.M. Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges and breakthroughs. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16(4):219-230.
34. Robinson S.E., Vrba J. Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). Recent Advances in Biomagnetism 1999, 302-305. Tohoku Univ. Press, Sendai, Japan. T. Yoshimoto, M. Kotani, S. Kuriki, H. Karibe, N. Nakasato (Eds.).
35. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 1987, 32(1):11-22.
36. Smith S.M. The future of FMRI connectivity. NeuroImage 2012, 62:1257-1266.
37. Smith S.M., et al. Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage 2011, 54:875-891.
38. Stam C.J., van Straaten E.C.W. The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 123:1067-1087.
39. Stam C.J., et al. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28(11):1178-1193.
40. Van Essen D.C., et al. The WU-Minn Human Connetome Project: an overview. NeuroImage 2013, 80:62-97.
41. Van Veen B.D., et al. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 44:867-880.
42. Varoquaux G., Craddock R.C. Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects. NeuroImage 2013, 80:405-415.
43. Varoquaux G., et al. Brain covariance selection: better individual functional connectivity models using population prior. "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2010, Vancouver, Canada 2010.
44. Wens V., et al. About the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2014, 125:1711-1713.
45. Woolrich M.W., Stephan K.E. Biophysical network models and the human connectome. NeuroImage 2013, 80:330-338.
46. Woolrich M.W., et al. MEG beamforming using Bayesian PCA for adaptive data covariance matrix regularization. NeuroImage 2011, 57:1466-1479.