Retraction Note: Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months (Clinical Oral Investigations, (2015), 19, 6, (1363-1369), 10.1007/s00784-014-1381-4);Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1363-1369

  Calvo Guirado, José Luis ^a   Pérez Albacete, Carlos ^a   Aguilar Salvatierra, Antonio ^b   de Val Maté Sánchez, José E ^a,b,c,d   Delgado Ruiz, Rafael A ^c   Abboud, Marcus ^c   Velasco, Eugenio ^d   Gómez Moreno, Gerardo ^b   Romanos, Georgios E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bone resorption; Bone to implant contact; Crestal placement; Mini implants; Narrow diameter implants; Subcrestal placement

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMAL; DOG; FEMALE; MANDIBLE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGERY; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMALS; BICUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DOGS; FEMALE; MANDIBLE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 84932196176     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05474-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Quek CE, Tan KB, Nicholls JI (2006) Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: Effect of diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21:929–936
2. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Carinci F (2008) Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: a retrospective study of 510 implants. J Periodontol 79:49–54
3. Albrektsson T, Gottlow J, Meirelles L, Ostman PO, Rocci A, Sennerby L (2007) Survival of NobelDirect implants: an analysis of 550 consecutively placed implants at 18 different clinical centers. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 9:65–70
4. Galindo-Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, Becktor J, Speroni S, Schramm A et al (2012) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants-1-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:609–616
5. Ohkubo C, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Sato J, Hosoi T, Kurtz KS (2006) Evaluation of transitional implant stabilized overdentures: a case series report. J Oral Rehabil 33:416–422
6. Jofre J, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Klattenhoff C (2010) The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:243–249
7. Lee YK, Kim JW, Baek SH, Kim TW, Chang YI (2010) Root and bone response to the proximity of a mini-implant under orthodontic loading. Angle Orthod 80:452–458
8. Zinsli B, Sagesser T, Mericske E, MericskeStern R (2004) Clinical evaluation of small diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:92–99
9. Froum SJ, Cho SC, Cho YS, Elian N, Tarnow D (2007) Narrow- diameter implants: a restorative option for limited interdental space. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 27:449–455
10. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I et al (1990) Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:272–281
11. Olate S, Lyrio MC, de Moraes M, Mazzonetto R, Moreira RW (2010) Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:414–419
12. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Mirisola Di Torresanto V, Rossini C (2006) Retrospective evaluation of mandibular incisor replacement with narrow neck implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:730–735
13. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F (2007) Wide-diameter implants: analysis of clinical outcome of 304 fixtures. J Periodontol 78:52–58
14. Anitua E, Errazquin JM, de Pedro J, Barrio P, Begona L, Orive G (2010) Clinical evaluation of tiny 2.5- and 3.0-mm narrow-diameter implants as definitive implants in different clinical situations: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantol 3:315–322
15. Balaji A, Mohamed JB, Kathiresan R (2010) A pilot study of mini implants as a treatment option for prosthetic rehabilitation of ridges with sub- optimal bone volume. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 9:334–338
16. Vigolo P, Givani A (2000) Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 84:50–54
17. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA (2008) Success rates of microimplants in Eden- tulous patients with residual ridge resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:270–276
18. Mundt T, Scwahnn C, Stark T, Biffar R (2013) Clinical response of edentulous people treated with mini dental implants in nine dental practices. Gerodontology. doi:10.1111/ger.12066
19. Donath K, Breuner G (1982) A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 11:318–326
20. Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J (2012) How successful are small- diameter implants? a literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:515–525
21. Calvo-Guirado JL, Gomez Moreno G, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Sanchez M, de Val JE, Abboud M, Nemcovsky CE (2014) Bone remodeling at implants with different configurations and placed immediately at different depth into extraction sockets. Experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/clr.12433
22. Calvo-Guirado JL, López-López PJ, de Val JE MS, Mareque-Bueno J, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Romanos GE (2014) Influence of collar design on peri-implant tissue healing around immediate implants: a pilot study in Foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/clr.12374
23. Boquete-Castro A, Gómez-Moreno G, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Romanos GE, Calvo-Guirado JL (2014) Influence of the implant design on osseointegration and crestal bone resorption of immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/clr.12381
24. Calvo-Guirado JL, Boquete-Castro A, Negri B, Delgado Ruiz R, Gómez-Moreno G, Iezzi G (2014) Crestal bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. A pilot study in foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:344–351
25. Negri B, Calvo Guirado JL, de Val JE MS, Delgado Ruíz RA, Ramírez Fernández MP, Barona Dorado C (2014) Peri-implant tissue reactions to immediate nonocclusal loaded implants with different collar design: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:e54–63
26. Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, de Val JE MS, Delgado Ruiz RA, Ramírez Fernández MP, Gómez Moreno G, Aguilar Salvatierra A, Guardia J, Muñoz Guzón F (2013) Biomechanical and bone histomorphological evaluation of two surfaces on tapered and cylindrical root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 15:799–808
27. Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Ramírez-Fernández MP, Maté Sánchez-de Val J, Guardia J, Muñoz-Guzón F (2012) Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:236–244
28. Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Pardo-Zamora G, Ramírez-Fernández MP, Delgado-Ruíz RA, Muñoz-Guzón F (2012) Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:228–235
29. Comfort MB, Chu FC, Chai J, Wat PY, Chow TW (2005) A 5-year prospective study on small diameter screw-shaped oral implants. J Oral Rehabilitation 32:341–345
30. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Rossi F, Cardoso LC, Pantani F, Lang NP (2012) Influence of implants with different sizes and configurations installed immediately into extraction sockets on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:396–401
31. Caneva M, Salata LA, de Souza SS, Baffone G, Lang NP, Botticelli D (2010) Influence of implant positioning in extraction sockets on osseointegration: histomorphometric analyses in dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res 21:43–49
32. Caneva M, Salata LA, de Souza SS, Bressan E, Botticelli D, Lang NP (2010) Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res 21:885–890
33. Renouard F, Nisand D (2006) Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 7:35–51
34. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D (2006) Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 19:586–592
35. Seo W, Kim SH, Chung KR, Nelson G (2009) A pilot study of the osseointegration potential of a surface-treated mini-implant: Bone contact of implants retrieved from patients. World J Orthod 10:202–210
36. Kim JW, Baek SH, Kim TW, Chang YI (2008) Comparison of stability between cylindrical and conical type mini-implants. Mechanical and histological properties. Angle Orthod 78:692–698
37. Cesaretti G, Lang NP, Salata LA, Schweikert MT, Gutierrez Hernandez ME, Botticelli D (2014) Sub-crestal positioning of implants results in higher bony crest resorption: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res 0:1–6. doi:10.1111/clr.12467