Biomechanical and Bone Histomorphological Evaluation of Two Surfaces on Tapered and Cylindrical Root Form Implants: An Experimental Study in Dogs

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 799-808

  Negri, Bruno ^a   Calvo Guirado, José Luis ^a   Maté Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo ^a   Delgado Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ^a   Ramírez Fernández, María Piedad ^a   Gómez Moreno, Gerardo ^b   Aguilar Salvatierra, Antonio ^a   Guardia, Javier ^a   Muñoz Guzón, Fernando ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Animal model; Cylindrical design; Dual acid etched; Sandblasted; Tapered design

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; DOG; MALE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH ROOT;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DOGS; MALE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 84897087233     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00431.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chuang SK, Tian L, Wei LJ, Dodson TB. Kaplan-Meier analysis of dental implant survival: a strategy for estimating survival with clustered observations. J Dent Res 2001; 80:2016-2020.
2. Chuang SK, Tian L, Wei LJ, Dodson TB. Predicting dental implant survival by use of the marginal approach of the semiparametric survival methods for clustered observations. J Dent Res 2002; 81:851-855.
3. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2 - review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:544-564.
4. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, etal. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88:579-596.
5. Bottino MC, Coelho PG, Henriques VA, Higa OZ, Bressiani AH, Bressiani JC. Processing, characterization, and in vitro/in vivo evaluations of powder metallurgy processed Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloys. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 88:689-696.
6. Lemons J, Dietch-Misch F. Biomaterials for dental implants. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary implant dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999:271-302.
7. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:251-262.
8. Lemons JE. Biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue healing, and immediate-function dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2004; 30:318-324.
9. Leonard G, Coelho P, Polyzois I, Stassen L, Claffey N. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:232-239.
10. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1 - review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:536-543.
11. Calvo-Guirado JL, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Negri B, López-Marí L, Rodríguez-Barba C, Schlottig F. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:308-315.
12. Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Piattelli A, Coelho PG. Removal torque and histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic grit-blasted/acid-etched and dual acid-etched implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 2008; 79:1942-1949.
13. Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Ramírez-Fernández MP, Maté Sánchez-de Val J, Guardia J, Muñoz-Guzón F. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02290.x [Epub ahead of print].
14. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67:932-949.
15. Eraslan O, Inan O. The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14:411-416.
16. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006; 85:560-565.
17. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, etal. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000; 79:1857-1863.
18. Yang Y, Kim KH, Ong JL. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process - an alternative to plasma spraying. Biomaterials 2005; 26:327-337.
19. Coelho PG, Lemons JE. Physico/chemical characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanothickness bioceramic depositions on alumina-blasted/acid-etched Ti-6Al-4V implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 90:351-361.
20. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11:292-302.
21. Coelho PG, Cardaropoli G, Suzuki M, Lemons JE. Early healing of nanothickness bioceramic coatings on dental implants. An experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88:387-393.
22. Granato R, Marin C, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of a thin ion beam bioceramic deposition on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 90:396-403.
23. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 90:577-585.
24. Orsini G, Piatelli M, Scarano A, etal. Randomized, controlled histologic and histomorphometeric evaluation of implants with nanometer-scale calcium phosphate added to the dual acid-etched surface in the human posterior maxilla. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1984-1990.
25. Park YS, Yi KY, Lee IS, Han CH, Jung YC. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:31-38.
26. Suzuki K, Aoki K, Ohya K. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. Bone 1997; 21:507-514.
27. Coelho PG, Suzuki M, Guimaraes MV, etal. Early bone healing around different implant bulk designs and surgical techniques: a study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12:202-208.
28. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2007; 28:4748-4755.
29. Negri B, Calvo-Guirado JL, Zamora GP, Ramírez Fernández MP, Delgado Ruíz R, Muñóz Guzón F. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02158.x [Epub ahead of print].