Success rates of microimplants in edentulous patients with residual ridge resorption

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 270-276

  Morneburg, Thomas R ^a,b   Pröschel, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Department of Cardiology   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Elderly patients; Implant supported dentures; Magnetic abutment; Narrow implants; O ring abutment; Severe ridge resorption; Slightly raised ridges

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; ELECTRONICS; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIODONTICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIATURIZATION; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 43149113226     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Slagter AP, Olthoff LW, Bosman F, Steen WH. Masticatory ability, denture quality, and oral conditions in edentulous subjects. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:299-307.
2. Wolff A, Gadre A, Begleiter A, Moskona D, Cardash H. Correlation between patient satisfaction with complete dentures and denture quality, oral condition, and flow rate of submandibular/sublingual salivary glands, Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:45-48.
3. Raghoebar GM, Mejer HJ, van't Hof M, Stengenga B, Vissink A. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10-year follow-up study on patient satisfaction, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:498-503.
4. Zinsli B, Sagesser T, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: A prospective study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:92-99.
5. Cerheli MC, Akça K. Narrow-diameter implants as terminal support for occlusal three-unit FDPs: A biomechanical analysis, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:513-519.
6. Himmlová L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:20-25.
7. van Eijden TM. Three-dimensional analyses of human bite-force magnitude and moment. Arch Oral Biol 1991;36:535-539.
8. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Lezzi G, Carinci F. Retrospective study of 200 immediately loaded implants retaining 50 mandibular overdentures. Quintessence Int 2007;38:281-288.
9. Hallman M. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: Results after 1 year of loading, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:731-736.
10. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:581-588.
11. Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11(suppl):59-68.
12. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Teerlinck J, Dekeyser C, Theuniers G. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting an overdenture. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:719-728.
13. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease on pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta odont Scand 1963;21:533-551.
14. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
15. Eckert S, Choi YG, Sánchez AR, Koka S. Comparison of dental implant systems: Quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:406-415.
16. Emmer Jr TJ, Emmer Sr TJ, Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK. Measurement of submucosal forces transmitted to dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1999;25:155-161.
17. Davarpanah M, Martinez H. Tecucianu JF, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Small-diameter implants: Indications and contraindications. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:186-194.
18. Flint DJ, Paunovich E, Moore WS, Wofford DT, Hermesch CB. A diagnostic comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:731-735.
19. Cox JF, Pharoah M. An alternative holder for radiographic evaluation of tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 56:338-341.
20. Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: A 5-year follow-up report, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:633-645.
21. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-298.
22. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin Schaffner T, Marti P, Geering AH. Periimplant mucosal aspects supporting overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:9-18.
23. Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs D, Schotte A, Darius P. The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:186-192.
24. Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van Oort RP, Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Branemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: One-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998:9:374-383.
25. MacEntee MI, Walton JN, Glick N. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: Three-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:28-37.