Parliamentary sovereignty, contemporary debates

Parliamentary Sovereignty, Contemporary Debates

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-326

  Goldsworthy, Jeffrey ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84932179777     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511781490     Document Type: Book

References (124)

1. R. Kay, ‘Legal Rhetoric and Revolutionary Change’ Caribbean Law Review7 (1997) 161.
2. R. Kay, ‘William III and the Legalist Revolution’ Connecticut Law Review32 (2000) 1645.
3. D. Edlin, Judges and Unjust Laws, Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008), p. 177.
4. R.A. Edwards, ‘Bonham's Case: Th e Ghost in the Constitutional Machine’ Denning Law Journal63 (1996) 76.
5. A.V. Dicey, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution(10th edn), E.C.S. Wade (ed.) (London: MacMillan, 1959), pp. 18–19.
6. J. Goldsworthy, Th e Sovereignty of Parliament, History and Philosophy(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).
7. Ian Ward, Th e English Constitution, Myths and Realities(Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2004), p. 185.
8. E. Wicks, Th e Evolution of the Constitution, Eight Key Moments in British Constitutional History(Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2006).
9. A. Stone Sweet, ‘Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review, and Why It May Not Matter’ Michigan Law Review101 (2003) 2744, 2755.
10. Robin Cooke, ‘Th e road Ahead for the Common Law’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53 (2004) 273 at 277.
11. M. Elliott, ‘United Kingdom Bicameralism, Sovereignty, and the Unwritten Constitution’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (2007) 370 at 379.
12. T. Ginsburg, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 3.
13. J. Waldron, Law and Disagreement(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
14. R. Dahl, Democracy and Its Critics(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), p. 192.
15. P.W. Hogg, A.A.B. Th ornton and W.K. Wright, ‘A Reply on “ Charter Dialogue Revisited” ’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45 (2007) 193, 201.
16. M. Tushnet, ‘ New forms of judicial review and the persistence of rights- and democracybased worries’ Wake Forest Law Review 38 (2003) 813.
17. M. Tushnet, ‘Weak-form Judicial Review: Its Implications for Legislatures’ New Zealand Journal of Public & International Law7 (2004).
18. T.R.S. Allan, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Th eory of the Rule of Law(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 271.
19. M.D.J. Conaglen, ‘Judicial Supremacy: An Alternative Constitutional Theory’ Auckland University Law Review 7 (1994) 665.
20. Mark D. Walters, ‘The Common Law Constitution and Legal Cosmopolitanism’ in David Dyzenhaus (ed.), The Unity of Public Law(Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004), p. 431.
21. D. Edlin, Judges and Unjust Laws; Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review(Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2008), pp. 188–9.
22. Thomas Poole, ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Th eory of Common Law Constitutionalism’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies23 (2003) 435.
23. Thomas Poole, ‘Questioning Common Law Constitutionalism’ Legal Studies25 (2005) 142.
24. Johann P. Sommerville, ‘Th e Ancient Constitution Reassessed: Th e Common Law, the Court and the Languages of Politics in Early Modern England’ in R. Malcolm Smuts (ed.), Th e Stuart Court and Europe: Essays in Politics and Political Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 39–64.
25. Johann P. Sommerville, Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640 (2nd edn) (London: Longman, 1999), pp. 103–4 and 261–2.
26. Brian Z. Tamanaha, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Th eory(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 57.
27. I. Loveland, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights; a Critical Introduction(4th edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 22.
28. S.B. Chrimes, English Constitutional Ideas in the Fift eenth Century (New York: American Scholar Publications, 1966), p. 16.
29. Norman Doe, Fundamental Authority in Late Medieval English Law(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
30. Howard Nenner, Th e Right to be King: Th e Succession to the Crown of England 1603 – 1714(North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1995), pp. 1–12.
31. John Fortescue, De Natura Legis Naturae(New York: Garland Publishing, 1980).
32. W.H. Dunham and C.T. Wood, ‘The Right to Rule in England: Depositions and the Kingdom's Authority, 1327–1485’ American Historical Review 81 (1976) 738 at 750.
33. Brian P. Levack, The Civil Lawyers in England 1603 – 1641: A Political Study(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 143.
34. David Wootton, (ed.), Divine Right and Democracy: An Anthology of Political Writing in Stuart England (Penguin, 1986), p. 129.
35. John Allison's The Historical English Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
36. Justice E.W. Thomas, ‘The Relationship of Parliament and the Courts’ Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 5 (2000) 31.
37. F. Jacobs, Th e Sovereignty of Law: the European Way, Th e Hamlyn Lectures 2006(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 5.
38. G. de Q. Walker, Th e Rule of Law, Foundation of Constitutional Democracy(Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1988), p. 159.
39. P. Morton, An Institutional Th eory of Law; Keeping Law in its Place(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), p. 371.
40. H. Finer, Th e Road to Reaction(London: Dennis Dobson, 1945).
41. G. Marshall, C onstitutional Conventions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), pp. 9 and 201.
42. A.V. Dicey, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution(10th edn), (E.W.S. Wade, ed.) (London: MacMillan, 1959).
43. P.G. Kauper, ‘The Supreme Court and the Rule of Law’ M ichigan Law Review 59 (1961) 531 at 532.
44. A. Hutchinson and P. Monahan, ‘Democracy and the Rule of Law’, in A. Hutchinson and P. Monahan (eds.), Th e Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology?(Toronto: Carswell, 1987).
45. A. Palmer and C. Sampford, ‘Retrospective Legislation in Australia: Looking Back at the 1980s’ Federal Law Review 22 (1994) 213 at 227.
46. P. Craig, ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’ Public Law(1997) 467.
47. J. Raz, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue’, in The Authority of Law(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981).
48. F. Wormuth, ‘Aristotle on Law’, in M.R. Konvitz and A.E. Murphy (eds.), Essays in Political Th eory Presented to George H. Sabine(New York and London: Kennikat Press, 1948) 45.
49. J. Rivers, ‘The Interpretation and Invalidity of Unjust Laws’, in D. Dyzenhaus (ed.), Recraft ing the Rule of Law: Th e Limits of Legal Order(Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999) p. 40.
50. K.C. Davis, Administrative Law: Cases-Text-Problems(6th edn) (St Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co., 1977), p. 26.
51. J. Waldron, ‘Th e Irrelevance of Moral Objectivity’, in R. George (ed.), Natural Law Th eory: Contemporary Essays(Oxford: Clarendon Press and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
52. J. Waldron, Law and Disagreement(Oxford: Clarendon Press and New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
53. P.S. Atiyah and R.S. Summers, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), p. 53.
54. W. Waluchow, Inclusive Legal Positivism(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
55. A.L. Goodhart, ‘The Rule of Law and Absolute Sovereignty’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 106 (1958) 943 at 950–2.
56. K.C. Davis, Discretionary Justice, A Preliminary Inquiry(Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1969).
57. T.R.S. Allan, Constitutional Justice, A Liberal Th eory of the Rule of Law(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
58. T.R.S. Allan, Law, Liberty, and Justice, Th e Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).
59. J. Goldsworthy, Th e Sovereignty of Parliament, History and Philosophy(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).
60. T.B. McAff ee, ‘Inalienable Rights, Legal Enforceability, and American Constitutions: the Fourteenth Amendment and the Concept of Unenumerated Rights’ Wake Forest Law Review36 (2001) 747.
61. J. Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain, Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), pp. 215–26.
62. J. Goldsworthy, Th e Sovereignty of Parliament, History and Philosophy(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).
63. H.L.A. Hart, Th e Concept of Law (2nd edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
64. P. Oliver, The Constitution of Independence, Th e Development of Constitutional Th eory in Australia, Canada and New Zealand(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
65. G. Winterton, ‘The British Grundnorm: Parliamentary Sovereignty Re-examined’ Law Quarterly Review 92 (1976) 591 at 604.
66. J. Goldsworthy, ‘Manner and Form in the Australian States’ Melbourne University Law Review16 (1987) 403.
67. M.J. Detmold, The Australian Commonwealth, A Fundamental Analysis of Its Constitution(Sydney: Law Book Co., 1985), p. 212.
68. J. Allison, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty, Europe and the Economy of the Common Law’, in M. Andenas (ed.), Judicial Review in International Perspective: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Lord Slynn of Hadley(Kluwer, 2000), 177.
69. J.F. Allison, The English Historical Constitution(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 119.
70. D. Clune and G. Griffith, Decision and Deliberation: Th e Parliament of New South Wales 1856–2003(Sydney: Federation Press, 2006), pp. 242–3.
71. W. L. Morison, ‘The Future Scope of Australian Common Law’ S ydney Law Review 13 335 (1991) at 338.
72. K. Turner, House of Review? The New South Wales Legislative Council, 1934–68(Sydney: Sydney University Press, 1969).
73. T. Blackshield, M. Coper, G. Fricke and T. Simpson, ‘Counsel, notable’, in T. Blackshield, M. Coper and G. Williams (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia(Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 160.
74. A.B. Keith, Responsible Government in the Dominions(2nd edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1928), pp. 352–3.
75. N.B. Nairn, Th e Big Fella: Jack Lang and the Australian Labor Party 1891–1949(Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1995), p. 214.
76. F. Cain, Jack Lang and the Great Depression(Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2005), p. 222.
77. A.S. Morrison, ‘Further Documents and Comment on the New South Wales Constitutional Crisis 1930–1932’ Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society 68 (1982) 122 at 129.
78. E. Campbell, Parliamentary Privilege(Sydney: Federation Press, 2003).
79. R.T.E. Latham, The Law and the Commonwealth(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949), p. 566.
80. A.B. Keith, Th e Constitutional Law of the British Dominions(London: Macmillan, 1933), p. 106.
81. P. Oliver, Th e Constitution of Independence: Th e Development of Constitutional Th eory in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 72.
82. H.V. Evatt, ‘Constitutional Interpretation in Australia’ University of Toronto Law Journal 3 (1939) 1 at 20.
83. D.V. Cowen, ‘Legislature and Judiciary’ Modern Law Review15 (1952) 282.
84. G. Winterton, ‘The British Grundnorm: Parliamentary Sovereignty Re-examined’ Law Quarterly Review 92 (1976) 591 at 604.
85. W.I. Jennings, Th e Law and the Constitution(5th edn) (London: University of London Press, 1959), pp. 151–63.
86. R.T.E. Latham, The Law and the Commonwealth(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949), p. 525.
87. P. Hanks, Constitutional Law in Australia(2nd edn) (Sydney: Butterworths, 1996), p. 92.
88. C. Munro, Studies in Constitutional Law(2nd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1999), p. 164.
89. G. Huscroft, ‘Constitutionalism From the top Down’ and A. Petter, ‘Taking Dialogue Th eory Much Too Seriously’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal45 (2007) 91.
90. P.W. Hogg, A.A.B. Th ornton and W.K. Wright, ‘A Reply on “C harter Dialogue Revisited” Osgoode Hall Law Journal45 (2007) 193.
91. M. Mandel, Th e Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada(2nd edn) (Toronto: Th ompson Educational Publishing, 1994), pp. 88–9.
92. P.H. Russell, ‘Standing Up For Notwithstanding’ Alberta Law Review229 (1991) 293.
93. F.L. Morton and R. Knopff, Th e Charter Revolution and the Court Party(Ontario: Broadview Press, 2000).
94. P.W. Hogg and A.A. Bushell, ‘The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal 35 (1997) 75.
95. R. Knopff and F.L. Morton, C harter Politics(Ontario: Nelson Canada, 1992).
96. P.W. Hogg, Constitutional Law of Canada(Ontario: Carswell, 1997), 36.
97. G. Huscroft, ‘Constitutionalism From the top Down’ and A. Petter, ‘Taking Dialogue Theory Much Too Seriously’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal45 (2007) 91.
98. A. Kavanagh, Constitutional Review Under the Human Rights Act(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 281–9
99. W. Nelson, On Justifying Democracy(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980).
100. A. Petter, ‘Taking Dialogue Th eory Much Too Seriously’ Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45 (2007) 147.
101. R. Ekins, ‘The Relevance of the Rule of Recognition’ Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy31 (2006) 95.
102. J. Goldsworthy, The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), p. 1.
103. James Kent, Commentaries on American Law(10th edn) (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1860), p.503
104. Thomas M. Cooley, A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon the Legislative Power of the States of the American Union(Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1868), pp. 87–9.
105. Roscoe Pound, ‘Common Law and Legislation’ H arvard Law Review21 (1908) 383.
106. D. Edlin, Judges and Unjust Laws(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008), p. 51.
107. Kent Greenawalt, Legislation: Statutory Interpretation – Twenty Questions(New York: Foundation Press, 1999), p. 23.
108. R. Dickerson, Th e Interpretation and Application of Statutes(Boston: Little Brown, 1975), pp. 2–5.
109. K. Whittington, Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review(Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999), pp. 5–9.
110. R. Pound, ‘Spurious Interpretation’ Columbia Law Review6 (1907) 379.
111. F. Easterbrook, ‘The Role of Original Intent in Statutory Construction’ Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy11 (1988) 61.
112. F.A.R. Bennion, Statutory Interpretation(2nd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1992), pp. 668–9.
113. D. Phil Thesis, The Nature of Legislative Intent (University of Oxford, 26 March 2009).
114. S.B. Chrimes, English Constitutional Ideas in the Fift eenth Century (New York, 1966 reprint), p. 294.
115. Philip A. Joseph, ‘Parliament, the Courts, and the Collaborative Enterprise’ King's College Law Journal15 (2004) 321.
116. A. Kavanagh, C onstitutional Review Under the UK Human Rights Act(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 414.
117. S. Lakin, ‘Debunking the Idea of Parliamentary Sovereignty: the Controlling Factor of Legality in the British Constitution’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies28 (2008) 709.
118. Douglas E. Edlin, Judges and Unjust Laws, Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008).
119. J.D. Ford, Law and Opinion in Scotland During the Seventeenth Century(Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007), pp. 322–4.
120. P. Joseph, Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand(3rd edn) (Wellington: Th omson/Brookers, 2007), p. 544.
121. A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution(10th edn) (London: Macmillan, 1959), p. 72.
122. Jeff rey Goldsworthy, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and Statutory Interpretation’, in R. Bigwood (ed.), Th e Statute: Making and Meaning(Wellington: LexisNexis, 2004), p. 187.
123. Philip A. Joseph, C onstitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand(2nd edn) (Wellington: Brookers, 2001), pp. 3.
124. Lord Devlin, ‘Judges as Lawmakers’ Modern Law Review39 (1976) 1.