Pollination crisis, plant sex systems, and predicting evolutionary trends in attractiveness

The Systematics Association Special Volume 81: Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 28-43

  De Jong, Tom J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931829277     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139014113.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Aizen, M. A. and Harder, L. D. (2007). Expanding the limits of the pollenlimitation concept: ef ects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology, 88, 271-81.
2. Aizen, M. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Cunningham, S. A. and Klein, A. M. (2008). Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency. Current Biology, 18, 1572-75.
3. Ashman, T. L. (2000). Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Ecology, 81, 2577-91.
4. Aizen, M. A. and Harder, L. D. (2007). Expanding the limits of the pollenlimitation concept: ef ects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology, 88, 271-81.
5. Aizen, M. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Cunningham, S. A. and Klein, A. M. (2008). Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency. Current Biology, 18, 1572-75.
6. Ashman, T. L. (2000). Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Ecology, 81, 2577-91.
7. Ashman, T. L. and Schoen, D. J. (1994). How long should l owers live? Nature, 371, 788-91.
8. Barrett, S. C. H. (2003). Mating strategies in l owering plants: the outcrossingseli ng paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 358, 991-1004.
9. Barrett, S. C. H. (2010). Darwin's legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of l owers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 365, 351-68.
10. Bell, G. (1985). On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 224, 223-65.
11. Bell, S. A. and Creswell, J. E. (1998). The phenology of gender in homogamous flowers: temporal change in the residual sex function of oilseed rape. Oikos, 98, 375-84.
12. Bertin, R. I. (1993). Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to selffertilization in Angiosperms. American Journal of Botany, 80, 557-60.
13. Buchmann, S. L. and Nabhan, G. P. (1997). The Forgotten Pollinators. Washington, DC: Island Press.
14. Burd, M. (1994). Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review, 60, 83-139.
15. Cohen, D. and Shmida, A. (1993). The evolution of flower display and reward. Evolutionary Biology, 27, 197-243.
16. Carlson, J. E. (2007). Male-biased nectar production in a protandrous herb matches predictions of sexual selection theory. American Journal of Botany, 94, 674-82.
17. Carlson, J. E. and Harms, K. E. (2006). The evolution of gender-biased production in hemaphrodite plants. Botanical Review, 72, 179-205.
18. Charlesworth, D. (1985). The distribution of diocey and self-incompatibility in angiosperms. In Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith, ed. P. J. Greenwood, P. H. Harvey and M. Slatkin. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237-268.
19. Charnov, E. L. and Bull, J. J. (1986). Sex allocation, pollinator attraction and fruit dispersal in cosexual plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 118, 321-25.
20. Darwin, C. (1877). The Dif erent Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. London, UK: Murray.
21. Darwin, C. (1878). The Ef ect of Cross-and Self-Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. London, UK: Pickering.
22. Delesalle, V. A. and Muenchow, G. E. (1992). Opportunities for seli ng and inbreeding depression in Sagittaria congeners (Alismataceae) with contrasting sexual systems. Evolutionary Trends in Plants, 6, 81-91.
23. Dorken, M. E., Friedman, J. and Barrett, S. C. H. (2002). The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Ecology, 56, 31-41.
24. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
25. Fishman, L. and Willis, J. H. (2008). Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist, 177, 802-10.
26. Ganeshaiah, K. N. and Shaanker, R. U. (1991). Floral sex-ratios in monoecious species: why are trees more male-biased than herbs? Current Science, 60, 319-21.
27. Haig, D. and Westoby, M. (1988). On limits to seed production. American Naturalist, 131, 757-9.
28. Jacobsen, R. (2008). Fruitless Fall: the Collapse of the Honeybee and the Coming Agricultural Crisis. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
29. de Jong, T. J. and Klinkhamer, P. G. L. (2005). Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Reproductive Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. de Jong, T. J., Batenburg, J. C. and Klinkhamer, P. G. L. (2005). Distancedependent pollen limitation of seed set in some insect-pollinated dioecious plants. Acta oecologia, 28, 331-5.
31. de Jong, T. J., Shmida, A. and h uijsman, F. (2008). Sex allocation in plants and the evolution of monoecy. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10, 1087-109.
32. Kawagoe, T. and Suzuki, N. (2005). Selfpollen on a stigma interferes with outcrossed seed production in a self-incompatible monoecious plant, Akebia quinata (Lardizabalaceae). Functional Ecology, 19, 49-54.
33. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., de Jong, T. J. and Linnenbank, L. A. (2001). Small-scale spatial patterns determine ecological relationships: an experimental example using nectar production rates. Ecology Letters, 4, 559-67.
34. Kobuta, S. and Ohara, M. (2009). Discovery of male sterile plants and their contrasting occurrence between self-compatible and self-incompatible populations of the hermaphroditic perennial Trillium camschatcense. Plant Species Biology, 24, 169-78.
35. Lloyd, D. G. (1975). The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica, 45, 325-39.
36. Miller, J. S. and Diggle, P. K. (2007). Correlated evolution of fruit size and sexual expression in andromonoecious Solanum sections Acanthophora and Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany, 94, 1706-15.
37. Mitchell, C. H. and Diggle, P. K. (2005). Evolution of unisexual flowers: morphological and functional convergence results from diverse developmental transitions. American Journal of Botany, 92, 1068-76.
38. Mitchell, R. J. and Ashman, T. L. (2008). Predicting evolutionary consequences of pollinator declines: the long and short of floral evolution. New Phytologist, 177, 576-9.
39. Mitchell, R. J., Flanagan, R. J., Brown, B. J., Waser, N. M. and Karron J. D. (2009). New frontiers in competition for pollination. Annals of Botany, 103, 1403-13.
40. Schoen, D. J. and Ashman, T. L. (1995). The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution, 49, 131-9.
41. Spalik, K. (1991). On evolution of andromonoecy and “overproduction” of flowers: a resource allocation model. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 42, 325-36.
42. Stanton, M. L., Snow, A. A. and Handel, S. N. (1986). Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male i tness. Science, 232, 1625-27.
43. Vaughton, G. and Ramsey, M. (2010). Floral emasculation reveals pollen quality limitation of seed output in Bulbine bulbosa. American Journal of Botany, 97, 174-8.
44. Webb, C. J. and Lloyd, D. G. (1986). The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigma in Angiosperms. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 24, 163-78.
45. Wilson, P., Thomson, J. C., Stanton, M. L. and Rigney, L. P. (1994). Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. American Naturalist, 143, 283-96.