Milk production responses to a change in dietary starch concentration vary by production level in dairy cattle

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 4698-4706

  Boerman, J P ^a   Potts, S B ^a   VandeHaar, M J ^a   Allen, M S ^a   Lock, A L ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diet starch concentration; Energy partitioning; Feed efficiency; Variation in treatment response

Indexed keywords

BOS; MEDICAGO SATIVA; ZEA MAYS;

CARBOHYDRATE DIET; STARCH;

ALFALFA; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; BOVINE; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; CHEMISTRY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; DRUG EFFECTS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; MAIZE; METABOLISM; MILK; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SECRETION (PROCESS); SOYBEAN; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DIET; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; DIETARY FIBER; DIGESTION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; MEDICAGO SATIVA; MILK; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOYBEANS; STARCH; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84931568027     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8999     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen M.S. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:1598-1624.
2. Allen M.S., Bradford B.J., Oba M. Board Invited Review: The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87:3317-3334.
3. Official Methods of Analysis 1990, AOAC, Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem, Arlington, VA. 15th.
4. Arriola Apelo S.I., Knapp J.R., Hanigan M.D. Invited review: Current representation and future trends of predicting amino acid utilization in the lactating dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97:4000-4017.
5. Bauman D.E., Harvatine K.J., Lock A.L. Nutrigenomics, rumen-derived bioactive fatty acids, and the regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2011, 31:299-319.
6. Bradford B.J., Allen M.S. Milk fat responses to a change in diet fermentability vary by production level in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:3800-3807.
7. Cook R.D., Weisberg S. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability: Residuals and Influence in Regression 1982, Chapman Hall, New York, NY.
8. De Koster J.D., Opsomer G. Insulin resistance in dairy cows. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2013, 29:299-322.
9. Edgerton M.D. Increasing crop productivity to meet global needs for feed, food, and fuel. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149:7-13.
10. Firkins J.L., Eastridge M.L. Replacement of forage or concentrate with combinations of soyhulls, sodium bicarbonate, or fat for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75:2752-2761.
11. Firkins J.L. Effects of feeding nonforage fiber sources on site of fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:1426-1437.
12. Goering H.K., Van Soest P.J. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Handbook No. 379 1970, USDA-Agric. Res. Serv., Washington, DC.
13. Griinari J.M., McGuire M.A., Dwyer D.A., Bauman D.E., Barbano D.M., House W.A. The role of insulin in the regulation of milk protein synthesis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:2361-2371.
14. Harvatine K., Allen M. Effects of fatty acid supplements on milk yield and energy balance of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:1081-1091.
15. Ipharraguerre I.R., Ipharraguerre R.R., Clark J.H. Performance of lactating dairy cows fed varying amounts of soyhulls as a replacement for corn grain. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:2905-2912.
16. Kammes K.L., Allen M.S. Nutrient demand interacts with grass particle length to affect digestion responses and chewing activity in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:807-823.
17. Lock A.L., Preseault C.L., Rico J.E., DeLand K.E., Allen M.S. Feeding a C16:0-enriched fat supplement increased the yield of milk fat and improved conversion of feed to milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:6650-6659.
18. Mackle T.R., Dwyer D.A., Ingvartsen K.L., Chouinard P.Y., Lynch J.M., Barbano D.M., Bauman D.E. Effects of insulin and amino acids on milk protein concentration and yield from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82:1512-1524.
19. Mahjoubi E., Amanlou H., Zahmatkesh D., Ghelich Khan M., Aghaziarati N. Use of beet pulp as a replacement for barley grain to manage body condition score in over-conditioned late lactation cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009, 153:60-67.
20. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 2001, National Research Council, Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC. 7th rev.
21. Piantoni P., Lock A.L., Allen M.S. Palmitic acid increased yields of milk and milk fat and nutrient digestibility across production level of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96:7143-7154.
22. Voelker J.A., Allen M.S. Pelleted beet pulp substituted for high-moisture corn: 1. Effects on feed intake, chewing behavior, and mil production of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86:3542-3552.
23. Voelker J.A., Burato G.M., Allen M.S. Effects of pretrial milk yield on responses of feed intake, digestion, and production to dietary forage concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:2650-2661.
24. Weiss W.P., Pinos-Rodriguez J.M., Wyatt D.J. The value of different fat supplements as sources of digestible energy for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:931-939.
25. Wildman E.E., Jones G.M., Wagner P.E., Bowman R.L. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65:495-501.