Methods for Developing Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measures (PRO-PMs)

Value in Health

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 493-504

  Basch, Ethan ^a   Spertus, John ^b   Adams Dudley, R ^c   Wu, Albert ^d   Chuahan, Cynthia ^e   Cohen, Perry ^f   Smith, Mary Lou ^g   Black, Nick ^h   Crawford, Amaris ⁱ   Christensen, Keri ⁱ   Blake, Kathleen ⁱ   Goertz, Christine ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^f Parkinson Pipeline Project   (United States)

^g Research Advocacy Network   (United States)

^h LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^j PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

patient reported outcome; performance measurement; PRO PM; quality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; PSYCHOMETRY; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84931564821     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012 Annual Progress Report to Congress on the National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care (National Quality Strategy). Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/nqs/nqs2012annlrpt.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
2. M. Brundage, J. Blazeby, and D. Revicki Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards Qual Life Res 22 2013 1161 1175
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical development to support labeling claims. December 2009. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
4. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: attributes and review criteria Qual Life Res 11 2002 193 205
5. European Medicines Agency. Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for use of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. July 2005. Available from: www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en-GB/document-library/Scientific-guideline/2009/09/WC500003637.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
6. Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective JAMA 307 2012 1636 1640
7. D. Blumenthal, and J. Dixon Health-care reforms in the USA and England: areas for useful learning Lancet 380 2012 1352 1357
8. J.V. Selby, A.C. Beal, and L. Frank The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda JAMA 307 2012 1583 1584
9. A. Gnanasakthy, M. Mordin, and M. Clark A review of patient-reported outcome labels in the United States: 2006 to 2010 Value Health 15 2012 437 442
10. A.W. Wu, C. Snyder, C.M. Clancy, and D.M. Steinwachs Adding the patient perspective to comparative effectiveness research Health Aff (Millwood) 29 2010 1863 1871
11. A.W. Wu, and C. Snyder Getting ready for patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in clinical practice Healthc Pap 11 2011 48 53
12. A.P. Abernethy, J.E. Herndon II, and J.L. Wheeler Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data Health Serv Res 43 2008 1975 1991
13. A.V. Bennett, R.E. Jensen, and E. Basch Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice CA Cancer J Clin 62 2012 336 347
14. E. Basch, and A.P. Abernethy Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes J Clin Oncol 29 2011 954 956
15. P.L. Harrison, J.E. Pope, C.R. Coberley, and E.Y. Rula Evaluation of the relationship between individual well-being and future health care utilization and cost Popul Health Manag 15 2012 325 330
16. L.I. Wagner, F. Zhao, and J-AW Chapman Patient-reported predictors of early treatment discontinuation: NCIC JMA.27/E1Z03. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX; 2011 Cancer Res 71 24, Suppl. 2011 662
17. P.S. Chan, G. Soto, and P.G. Jones Patient health status and costs in heart failure: insights from the eplerenone post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure efficacy and survival study (ephesus) Circulation 119 2009 398 407
18. C.C. Gotay, C.T. Kawamoto, A. Bottomley, and F. Efficace The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials J Clin Oncol 26 2008 1355 1363
19. J.M. Valderas, A. Kotzeva, and M. Espallargues The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature Qual Life Res 17 2008 179 193
20. J. Chen, L. Ou, and S.J. Hollis A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting BMC Health Serv Res 13 2013 211
21. S.B. Detmar, M.J. Muller, and J.H. Schornagel Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 288 2002 3027 3034
22. G. Velikova, L. Booth, and A.B. Smith Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial J Clin Oncol 22 2004 714 724
23. E. Basch The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting N Engl J Med 362 2010 865 869
24. A.K. Jha, E.J. Orav, J. Zheng, and A.M. Epstein Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States N Engl J Med 359 2008 1921 1931
25. D. Lansky Overview: performance measures - the next generation Jt Comm J Qual Improv 22 1996 439 442
26. Bethell C, for FACCT (Foundation for Accountablity). Patient-centered care measures for the National Health Care Quality Report. May 2000. Available from: http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/95530.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
27. Lansky D., Bethell C, for FACCT (Foundation for Accountability). Consumers and quality: What do they know? What do they want? Results from FACCT Consumer Research 1996-2000. Available from: http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/95534.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
28. Butt Z, Reeve B. Enhancing the patient's voice: standards in the design and selection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) for use in patient-centered outcomes research. A report prepared for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Available from: www.pcori.org/assets/Enhancing-the-Patients-Voice-Standards-in-the-Design-and-Selection-of-Patient-Reported-Outcomes-Measures-for-Use-in-Patient-Centered-Outcomes-Research.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
29. Acaster S, Cimms T, Lloyd A. Development of a methodological standards report. The design and selection of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS) for use in patient-centered outcomes research. A report prepared for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Available from: http://www.pcori.org/assets/The-Design-and-Selection-of-Patient-Reported-Outcomes-Measures-for-Use-in-Patient-Centered-Outcomes-Research.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
30. A.J. Vickers, D. Sjoberg, and E. Basch How do you know if you are any good? A surgeon performance feedback system for the outcomes of radical prostatectomy Eur Urol 61 2012 284 289
31. P.C. Chen, Y.C. Lee, and R.N. Kuo Differences in patient reports on the quality of care in a diabetes pay-for-performance program between 1 year enrolled and newly enrolled patients Int J Qual Health Care 24 2012 189 196
32. J.N. Weinstein, T.D. Tosteson, and J.D. Lurie Surgical vs. nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial JAMA 296 2006 2441 2450
33. N. Jones, S.L. Jones, and N.A. Miller The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey program: overview, context, and near-term prospects Health Qual Life Outcomes 2 2004 33 43
34. J.E. Gilbert, D. Howell, and S. King Quality improvement in cancer symptom assessment and control: the Provincial Palliative Care Integration Project (PPCIP) J Pain Symptom Manage 43 2012 663 678
35. A.W. Wu, Y. Young, and E.A. Skinner Quality of care and outcomes of adults with asthma treated by specialists and generalists in managed care Arch Intern Med 161 2001 2554 2560
36. J. Appleby, and N. Devlin Measuring Success in the NHS: Using Patient-Assessed Health Outcomes to Manage the Performance of Health Care Providers 2004 King's Fund London Available from: http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/n.j.devlin/measuring%20success%20in%20the%20NHS.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014]
37. Swedish Rheumatology Registers (sRR). Annual report from sRR. 2011. Available from: www.swerre.se/cms/sv/provider/reports. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
38. National Health Service, National Clinical Audit Support Programme (NCASP). Overview of Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction (MBR) audit for women in England and Wales. Available from: www.ic.nhs.uk/mbr. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
39. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) National Coverage Determination for Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/MedicareApprovedFacilitie/Transcatheter-Aortic-Valve-Replacement-TAVR.html. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
40. The Commonwealth Fund. Purchasing high performance Boeing's nurse case managers cut per capita costs by 20 percent. Available from: www.commonwealthfund.org/Newsletters/Purchasing-High-Performance/2011/March-29-2011/Case-Study/Boeings-Nurse-Case-Managers.aspx. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
41. Minnesota Community Measurement. Minnesota Health Scores overview. Available from: www.mnhealthscores.org. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
42. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Audit Programme description. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/orca/audit. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
43. L.B. Mokkink, C.B. Terwee, and D.L. Patrick The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 737 745
44. S.J. Coons, C.J. Gwaltney, and R.D. Hays Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report Value Health 12 2009 419 429
45. D. Wild, A. Grove, and M. Martin Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation Value Health 8 2005 94 104
46. Johnson C, Aaronson N, Blazeby JM, et al. EORTC Quality of Life Group: guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. 2011. Available from: http://groups.eortc.be/qol/Pdf%20presentations/Guidelines%20for%20Developing%2 0questionnaire-%20FINAL.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
47. M. Rothman, L. Burke, and P. Erickson Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report Value Health 12 2009 1075 1083
48. D.A. Revicki, D. Osoba, and D. Fairclough Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States Qual Life Res 9 2000 887 900
49. D.L. Fairclough, H.F. Peterson, D. Cella, and P. Bonomi Comparison of several model-based methods for analysing incomplete quality of life data in cancer clinical trials Stat Med 17 1998 781 796
50. National Quality Forum Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Performance Measurement 2013 National Quality Forum Washington, DC Available from http://www.qualityforum.orgProjectsn-rPatient-Reported-OutcomesPatient-Reported-Outcomes.aspx
51. E. Basch, P. Torda, and K. Adams Patient-reported outcomes-based performance measures JAMA 310 2013 139 140
52. M. Brundage, B. Bass, and J. Davidson Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers Qual Life Res 20 2011 653 664
53. A. Hutchings, K. Grosse Frie, and J. Neuburger Late response to patient reported outcome questionnaires was associated with worse outcome J Clin Epidemiol 66 2013 218 225
54. A.J. Vickers, C.J. Savage, and M. Shouery Validation study of a web-based assessment of functional recovery after radical prostatectomy Health Qual Life Outcomes 8 2010 82 88
55. Society of Thoracic Surgeons and American College of Cardiology. TVT registry for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. Available from: https://www.ncdr.com/TVT/Home/Default.aspx. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
56. Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. Peer reviewed technical report: using patient-reported information to improve health outcomes and health care value: case studies from Dartmouth, Karolinska, and Group Health. 2012. Available from: http://tdi.dartmouth.edu/images/uploads/tdi-tr-pri-ia-sm.pdf. [Accessed April 4, 2014].
57. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Health Outcomes Survey: program overview. Available from: http://www.hosonline.org/Content/Default.aspx. [Accessed April 4, 2014].