Past, present, and future of craniofacial superimposition: Literature and international surveys

Legal Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 267-278

  Huete, Maria Isabel ^a   Ibáñez, Oscar ^a,b   Wilkinson, Caroline ^c   Kahana, Tzipi ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR SOFT COMPUTING   (Spain)

^c LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Israel Police   (Israel)

Author keywords

Computer aided superimposition; Craniofacial superimposition; MEPROCS; Photographic superimposition; Video superimposition

Indexed keywords

CHEEK; CHIN; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; EAR; EYE; EYEBROW; FACE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOUTH; PHOTOGRAPHY; REVIEW; VIDEORECORDING; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOMETRY; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SKULL;

BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION; FACE; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PHOTOGRAPHY; SKULL;

EID: 84931561276     PISSN: 13446223     EISSN: 18734162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.02.001     Document Type: Review

References (155)

1. Cattaneo C. Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Sci Int 2007, 165:185-193.
2. Burns K.R., Wallington J. Forensic anthropology training manual 1999, Prentice Hall, Saddle River, New Jersey.
3. Yoshino M., Seta S. Skull-photo superimposition. Enc Forensic Sci 2000, 2:807-815.
4. Aulsebrook W., Işcan M.Y., Slabbert J., et al. Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. Forensic Sci Int 1995, 75:101-120.
5. Stephan C.N. Craniofacial identification: techniques of facial approximation and craniofacial superimposition. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology 2009, 304-321. Left Coast Press, California. S. Blau, D.H. Ubelaker (Eds.).
6. Glaister J., Brash J.C. Medico-legal aspects of the Ruxton case 1937, Livingstone, Edinburgh.
7. Simpson K., Dobkin Rex v. The Baptist Church cellar murder. Med Legal Soc Trans 1943, 11:132-145.
8. Gordon I., Drennan M. Medico-legal aspects of the Wolkersdorfer case. S Afr Med J 1948, 22:543-549.
9. Prinsloo I. The identification of skeletal remains in Regina versus K and another: The Howick Falls murder case. J Forensic Med 1953, 1:11-17.
10. Sen N. Identification by superimposed photographs. Int Crim Police Rev 1962, 162:284-286.
11. Ubelaker D.H. A history of Smithsonian-FBI collaboration in forensic anthropology, especially in regard to facial imagery. Forensic Sci Commun 2000, 2.
12. Basauri C. A body identified by forensic odontology and superimposed photographs. Int Crim Police Rev 1967, 204:37-43.
13. Bastiaan R.J., Dalitz G.D., Woodward C. Video superimposition of skulls and photographic portraits-a new aid to identification. J Forensic Sci 1986, 31:1373-1379.
14. Brown K.A. The identification of Linda Agostini: the significance of dental evidence in the Albury Pyjama Girl case. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1982, 3:131-142.
15. Gejvall N. Superimposition plus SEM-comparison of hair cuticle for identification purpose. Int J Skeletal Res 1974, 1:99-103.
16. Janssens P., Hansch C., Voorhamme L. Identity determination by superimposition with anthropological cranium adjustment. Int J Skeletal Res 1978, 5:109-122.
17. McKenna J.J., Jablonski N.G., Fearnhead R.W. A method of matching skulls with photographic portraits using landmarks and measurements of the dentition. J Forensic Sci 1984, 29:787-797.
18. Reddy K. Identification of dismembered parts: the medicolegal aspects of the Nagaraju case. Forensic Sci 1973, 2:351-374.
19. Sekharan P.C. A revised superimposition technique for identification of the individual from the skull and photograph. J Crim L Criminol 1971, 107-113.
20. Sivaram S., Wadhera C. Identity from skeleton-a case study. Forensic Sci 1975, 5:166.
21. Vogel G. Zur Identifizierung unbekannter Toter. Kriminalistik 1968, 4:187-189.
22. Webster W.P., Murray W.K., Brinkhous W., Hudson P. Identification of human remains using photographic reconstruction. Forensic osteology: advanced in the identification of human remains using photographic reconstruction 1986, 256-289. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas. J.K. Reichs, W.M. Bass (Eds.).
23. Helmer R.P., Grüner O. Vereinfachte Schädelidentifizierung nach dem Superprojektionsverfahren mit Hilfe einer Video-Anlage. Z Rechtsmed 1977, 80:183-187.
24. Austin-Smith D., Maples W.R. The reliability of skull/photograph superimposition in individual identification. J Forensic Sci 1994, 39:446-455.
25. *. J Forensic Sci 2008, 53:34-40.
26. Sekharan, P.C. Video superimposition technology practised. Proceedings of the advances in skull identification via video superimposition: An international symposium and workshop. Kiel, West Germany, 1998, p. 3.
27. Shahrom A., Vanezis P., Chapman R., et al. Techniques in facial identification: computer-aided facial reconstruction using a laser scanner and video superimposition. Int J Legal Med 1996, 108:194-200.
28. Solla H., Iscan M.Y. Skeletal remains of Dr. Eugenio Antonio Berrios Sagredo. Forensic Sci Int 2001, 116:201-211.
29. Yoshino M., Imaizumi K., Miyasaka S., et al. Evaluation of anatomical consistency in craniofacial superimposition images. Forensic Sci Int 1995, 74:125-134.
30. Ubelaker D.H., Bubniak E., O'Donnell G. Computer-assisted photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1992, 37:750-762.
31. Birngruber C.G., Kreutz K., Ramsthaler F., et al. Superimposition technique for skull identification with Afloat® software. Int J Legal Med 2010, 124:471-475.
32. Pushparani C. Radiography superimposition in personal identification-a case study involving surgical implants. J Forensic Res 2011, 3:2.
33. Bilge Y., Kedici P.S., Alakoç Y.D., et al. The identification of a dismembered human body: a multidisciplinary approach. Forensic Sci Int 2003, 137:141-146.
34. Takač Š., Pilija V. Exclusion of identification by negative superposition. Glas Antropol druš Srb 2012, 311-316.
35. Al-Amad S., McCullough M., Graham J., et al. Craniofacial identification by computer-mediated superimposition. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2006, 24:47-52.
36. Ghosh A., Sinha P. An economised craniofacial identification system. Forensic Sci Int 2001, 117:109-119.
37. Ibáñez O., Cordón O., Damas S., et al. Multimodal genetic algorithms for craniofacial superimposition. Nature-inspired informatics for intelligent applications and knowledge discovery: implications in business, science, and engineering 2009, IGI Global, Hersey. R. Chiong (Ed.).
38. Nickerson B.A., Fitzhorn P.A., Koch S.K., et al. A methodology for near-optimal computational superimposition of two-dimensional digital facial photographs and three-dimensional cranial surface meshes. J Forensic Sci 1991, 36:480-500.
39. Ghosh A., Sinha P. An unusual case of cranial image recognition. Forensic Sci Int 2005, 148:93-100.
40. Taylor J., Brown K. Superimposition techniques. Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine 1998, 151-164. Arnold, London. J.G. Clement, D. Ranson (Eds.).
41. Martin R., Saller K. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie 1957, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. 3rd ed.
42. Codinha SCF. Facing the dead: prediction of facial soft tissue depths from craniometric dimensions for forensic craniofacial identification [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Coimbra; 2010.
43. *. J Forensic Sci 2008, 53:1257-1272.
44. Preedy V.R. Handbook of anthropometry: physical measures of human form in health and disease 2012, Springer.
45. Stephan C.N. The application of the central limit theorem and the law of large numbers to facial soft tissue depths: T-table robustness and trends since 2008. J Forensic Sci 2014, 59:454-462.
46. Stephan CN. Craniofacialidentification.com [Online] [cited 2014 Oct 29]. Available at: . http://www.craniofacialidentification.com/.
47. Clement J.G., Ranson D. Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine 1998, Arnold, London.
48. Balueva T., Veselovskaya E., Valencia-Caballero L., et al. Nuevos estudios en el área de reconstrucción facial a partir de datos craneológicos. Rev Esp de Antropol Fís 2009, 11-22.
49. Fedosyutkin B.A., Nainys J.V. The relationship of skull morphology to facial features. Forensic analysis of the skull 1993, 199-213. Wiley-Liss, New York. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Eds.).
50. Wilkinson C.M., Mautner S.A. Measurement of eyeball protrusion and its application in facial reconstruction. J Forensic Sci 2003, 48:12-16.
51. Stephan C.N. Facial approximation: globe projection guideline falsified by exophthalmometry literature. J Forensic Sci 2002, 47:730-735.
52. Whitnall S.E. Anatomy of the orbit 1921, Oxford Medical Publication, London.
53. Stephan C.N., Davidson P.L. The placement of the human eyeball and canthi in craniofacial identification. J Forensic Sci 2008, 53:612-619.
54. Stephan C.N. Craniofacial identification: techniques of facial approximation and craniofacial superimposition. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology 2010, 304-321. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek. S. Blau, D.H. Ubelaker (Eds.).
55. Krogman W.M., Iscan M.Y. The human skeleton in forensic medicine 1986, Charles C Thomas, Springfield.
56. Angel J. Anonymous Restoration of head and face for identification. Proceedings of meetings of American academy of forensic science. St. Louis, MO; 1978.
57. Wolff E., Warwick R. Eugene Wolff's Anatomy of the eye and orbit: including the central connexions, development, and comparative anatomy of the visual apparatus 1976, Lewis, London.
58. Rosenstein T., Talebzadeh N., Pogrel M.A. Anatomy of the lateral canthal tendon. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000, 89:24-28.
59. Couly G., Hureau J., Tessier P. The anatomy of the external palpebral ligament in man. J Maxillofac Surg 1976, 4:195-197.
60. Anastassov G.E., van Damme P.A. Evaluation of the anatomical position of the lateral canthal ligament: clinical implications and guidelines. J Craniofac Surg 1996, 7:429-436.
61. Yoshino M., Seta S. Personal identification of human skull: superimposition and radiographic techniques. Forensic Sci Rev 1989, 1:23-42.
62. Stewart T.D. The points of attachment of the palpebral ligaments: their use in facial reconstructions on the skull. J Forensic Sci 1983, 28:858-863.
63. Rynn C., Balueva T., Veselovskaya E. Relationships between the skull and face. Craniofacial identification 2012, 193. University Press, Cambridge. C.M. Wilkinson, C. Rynn (Eds.).
64. Tandler J. Über den Schädel Haydns. Mitteilungen der Anthropologie Gesellschaft Wien 1909, 39:260-280.
65. Virchow H. Die anthropologische untersuchung der nase. Z Ethnol 1912, 289-337.
66. Gerasimov M.M. The reconstruction of the face from the basic structure of the skull 1955, Publisher Unknown, Russia.
67. Glanville E.V. Nasal shape, prognathism and adaptation in man. Am J Phys Anthropol 1969, 30:29-37.
68. Macho G.A. An appraisal of plastic reconstruction of the external nose. J Forensic Sci 1986, 31:1391-1403.
69. Robison J.M., Rinchuse D.J., Zullo T.G. Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form. Am J Orthod 1986, 89:499-506.
70. George R.M. Anatomical and artistic guidelines for forensic facial reconstruction. Forensic analysis of the skull 1993, 215-227. Willey-Liss, New York. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Eds.).
71. Prokopec M., Ubelaker D.H. Reconstructing the shape of the nose according to the skull. Forensic Sci Commun 2002, 4.
72. Stephan C.N., Henneberg M., Sampson W. Predicting nose projection and pronasale position in facial approximation: a test of published methods and proposal of new guidelines. Am J Phys Anthropol 2003, 122:240-250.
73. Schultz A.H. Relation of the external nose to the bony nose and nasal cartilages in whites and negroes. Am J Phys Anthropol 1918, 1:329-338.
74. Rynn C. Craniofacial approximation and reconstruction: tissue depth patterning and the prediction of the nose [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Dundee; 2006.
75. Rynn C., Wilkinson C.M., Peters H.L. Prediction of nasal morphology from the skull. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2010, 6:20-34.
76. Stephan C.N., Murphy S. Mouth width prediction in craniofacial identification: cadaver tests of four recent methods, including two techniques for edentulous skulls. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2008, 27:2-7.
77. Rudee D.A. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod 1964, 50:421-434.
78. Roos N. Soft-tissue profile changes in Class II treatment. Am J Orthod 1977, 72:165-175.
79. Koch R., Gonzales A., Witt E. Profile and soft tissue changes during and after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1979, 1:193-199.
80. Waldman B.H. Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction. Angle Orthod 1982, 52:129-134.
81. Holdaway R.A. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983, 84:1-28.
82. Denis K.L., Speidel T.M. Comparison of three methods of profile change prediction in the adult orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987, 92:396-402.
83. Faysal Talass M., Tollaae L., Baker R.C. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987, 91:385-394.
84. Subtelny J.D. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1959, 45:481-507.
85. Renwick N. Ear lobe morphology and its relationship to the mastoid process. Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee, Dundee. AXIS: Online J CAHID, 12; 2012.
86. Guyomarch P., Stephan C.N. The validity of ear prediction guidelines used in facial approximation. J Forensic Sci 2012, 57:1427-1441.
87. Farkas L.G. Anthropometry of the head and face in medicine 1981, Elsevier Norlh Holland, New York.
88. Powell N., Humphreys B. Proportions of the aesthetic face 1984, Thieme-Stratton, New York.
89. Helmer R.P. Schädelidentifizierung durch elektronische Bildmischung: zugleich ein Beitrag zur Konstitutionsbiometrie und Dickenmessung der Gesichtsweichteile 1984, Kriminalistik Verlag, Heidelberg.
90. Helmer R.P. Identification of the cadaver remains of Josef Mengele. J Forensic Sci 1987, 32:1622-1644.
91. Chai D.S., Lan Y.W., Tao C., et al. A study on the standard for forensic anthropologic identification of skull-image superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1989, 34:1343-1356.
92. Yoshino M. Craniofacial superimposition. Craniofacial identification 2012, 238-253. University Press, Cambridge. C.M. Wilkinson, C. Rynn (Eds.).
93. Lan Y. A study on national differences in identification standards for Chinese skull-image superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 1995, 74:135-153.
94. Jayaprakash P., Srinivasan G., Amravaneswaran M. Cranio-facial morphanalysis: a new method for enhancing reliability while identifying skulls by photo superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 2001, 117:121-143.
95. Ricci A., Marella G.L., Apostol M.A. A new experimental approach to computer-aided face/skull identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2006, 27:46-49.
96. Ishii M., Yayama K., Motani H., et al. Application of superimposition based personal identification using skull computed tomography images. J Forensic Sci 2011, 56:960-966.
97. Gordon G.M., Steyn M. An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample. Forensic Sci Int 2012, 216:198. e1-198. e6.
98. Ogawa H. Anatomical study on the Japanese head by the X-ray cephalometry. Shika Gakuho 1960, 60:17-34.
99. Işcan M.Y. Introduction of techniques for photographic comparison: potential and problems. Forensic analysis of the skull 1993, 57-70. Willey-Liss, New York. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Eds.).
100. Gatliff B.P. Facial sculpture on the skull for identification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1984, 5:327-332.
101. Rhine J.S., Campbell H.R. Thickness of facial tissues in American blacks. J Forensic Sci 1980, 25:847-858.
102. George R.M. The lateral craniographic method of facial reconstruction. J Forensic Sci 1987, 32:1305-1330.
103. Miyasaka S. Progress in facial reconstruction technology. Forensic Sci Rev 1999, 11:51-90.
104. Suzuki H. Thickness of Japanese facial skin. Anthropol Sci 1948, 60:7-11.
105. Ichikawa K. Morphological relationships between nose breadth and aperture piriformis on the view point of face type. Rep Nat Inst Police Sci 1975, 28:133-136.
106. Iscan M.Y. Introduction of techniques for photographic comparison: potential and problems. Forensic analysis of skull 1993, 57-90. Wiley-Liss, New York. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Eds.).
107. Yoshino M., Matsuda H., Kubota S., et al. Computer-assisted skull identification system using video superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 1997, 90:231-244.
108. Damas S., Cordón O., Ibáñez O., et al. Forensic identification by computer-aided craniofacial superimposition: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 2011, 43:27.
109. Scully B., Nambiar P. Determining the validity of Furue's method of craniofacial superimposition for identification. Malay J Comput Sci 2002, 9:17-22.
110. Sognnaes R.F. Hitler and Bormann identifications compared by postmortem craniofacial and dental characteristics. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1980, 1:105-116.
111. Cocks F. Barkly highway murder. Criminologist 1971, 6:41-53.
112. Webster G. Photography as an aid in identification: the Plumbago Pit case. Police J. 1955, 28:185.
113. Gruner O., Reinhard R. A photographical procedure for cranial identification. Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med 1959, 48:247-256.
114. Maat G. The positioning and magnification of faces and skulls for photographic superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 1989, 41:225-235.
115. Brocklebank L.M., Holmgren C.J. Development of equipment for the standardization of skull photographs in personal identifications by photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1989, 34:1214-1221.
116. Lan Y. Development and current status of skull-image superimposition-methodology and instrumentation. Forensic Sci Rev 1992, 4:125-136.
117. Dorion R.B. Photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1983, 28:724-734.
118. Pearson K., Morant G. The Wilkinson head of Oliver Cromwell and its relationship to busts, masks and painted portraits. Biometrika 1934, 26:1-116.
119. Klonaris N.S., Furue T. Photographic superimposition in dental identification. Is a picture worth a thousand words?. J Forensic Sci 1980, 25:859-865.
120. Jayaprakash P., Singhb B., Yusopc Ridzuan Abd., Mohd Aziz, et al. Skull-photo superimposition: a remedy to the problem of unidentified dead in Malaysia. Health Environ J 2010, 1:65-74.
121. Koelmeyer T.D. Videocamera superimposition and facial reconstruction as an aid to identification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1982, 3:45-48.
122. McKenna J.J. A method of orientation of skull and camera for use in forensic photographic investigation. J Forensic Sci 1988, 33:751-755.
123. Austin D. Video superimposition at the C.A. Pound Laboratory 1987 to 1992. J Forensic Sci 1987, 1999(44):695-699.
124. Iten P.X. Identification of skulls by video superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1987, 32:173-188.
125. Sekharan P.C. Positioning the skull for superimposition. Forensic analysis of the skull 1993, 105-118. Willey-Liss, New York. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Eds.).
126. Delfino P.V., Vacca E., Potente F., et al. Shape analytical morphometry in computer-aided skull identification via video superimposition. Forensic analysis of the skull 1993, 131-159. Willey-Liss, New York. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Eds.).
127. Delfino P.V., Colonna M., Vacca E., et al. Computer-aided skull/face superimposition. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1986, 7:201-212.
128. Lan Y. Research report on model TLGA-213 image superimposition identification system. Special Issue on Criminal Technology Supplement. The Fifth Bureau of the National Public Security Department. Beijing, China 1990;13.
129. Lan Y., Cai D. A new technology in skull identification. Advances in skull identification via video superimposition 1988, 3. Kiel, Germany. R.P. Helmer (Ed.).
130. Lan Y, Cai D. Study on model TLGA-1 skull identification apparatus. Special Issue on Criminal Technology Supplement. The Fifth Bureau of the National Public Security Department. Beijing, China 1985;3.
131. Lan Y., Cai D. Technical advances in skull-to-photo superimposition. Forensic analysis of the skull 1993, 119-129. Willey-Liss, New York. M.Y. Iscan, R.P. Helmer (Eds.).
132. Tao C. Report on computer programming for model TLGA-1 skull identification. Special Issue on Criminal Technology Supplement. The Fifth Bureau of the National Public Security Department. Beijing, China 1986;41.
133. Bajnoczky I., Kiralyfalvi L. A new approach to computer-aided comparison of skull and photograph. Int J Legal Med 1995, 108:157-161.
134. Bäck T., Fogel D.B., Michalewicz Z. Handbook of Evolutionary Computation 1997, IOP and Oxford University Press, Bristol.
135. Benazzi S., Fantini M., De Crescenzio F., et al. The face of the poet Dante Alighieri reconstructed by virtual modelling and forensic anthropology techniques. J Archeol Sci 2009, 36:278-283.
136. Fantini M., de Crescenzio F., Persiani F., et al. 3D restitution, restoration and prototyping of a medieval damaged skull. Rapid Prototyping J 2008, 14:318-324.
137. Santamaría J., Cordón O., Damas S., et al. A scatter search-based technique for pair-wise 3D range image registration in forensic anthropology. Soft Comput 2007, 11:819-828.
138. Santamaría J, Cordón O, Damas S, et al. Tackling the coplanarity problem in 3D camera calibration by means of fuzzy landmarks: a performance study in forensic craniofacial superimposition. In: Proc IEEE 12th Int Conf Comput Vision. IEEE Comput Soc, 2009b. p. 1686-1693.
139. Santamaría J., Cordón O., Damas S., et al. Performance evaluation of memetic approaches in 3D reconstruction of forensic objects. Soft Comput 2009, 13:883-904.
140. Ballerini L., Calisti M., Cordón O., et al. Automatic feature extraction from 3D range images of skulls. IWCF 2008. LNCS 5158 2008, 58-69. Springer, Berlin. S.N. Srihari, K. Franke (Eds.).
141. Ballerini L., Cordón O., Damas S., et al. Automatic 3D modeling of skulls by scatter search and heuristic features. Appl Soft Comput 2009, 52:149-158.
142. Biwasaka H., Saigusa K., Aoki Y. The applicability of holography in forensic identification: a fusion of the traditional optical technique and digital technique. J Forensic Sci 2005, 50:393-399.
143. Galantucci L., Percoco G., Angelelli G., et al. Reverse engineering techniques applied to a human skull, for CAD 3D reconstruction and physical replication by rapid prototyping. J Med Eng Technol 2006, 30:102-111.
144. Ibáñez O., Ballerini L., Cordón O., et al. An experimental study on the applicability of evolutionary algorithms to craniofacial superimposition in forensic identification. Inf Sci 2009, 179:3998-4028.
145. Ibánez O., Cordón O., Damas S., et al. Modeling the skull-face overlay uncertainty using fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2011, 19:946-959.
146. Ibáñez O., Cordón O., Damas S., et al. Craniofacial superimposition based on genetic algorithms and fuzzy location of cephalometric landmarks. Hybrid artificial intelligence systems 2008, 599-607. Springer.
147. Ballerini L, Cordon O, Santamaria J, et al. Anonymous Craniofacial superimposition in forensic identification using genetic algorithms. In: Proc IEEE Int Workshop Comput Forensics. Springer 2007. p. 429-434.
148. Ibáñez O., Cordón O., Damas S., et al. An advanced scatter search design for skull-face overlay in craniofacial superimposition. Expert Syst Appl 2012, 39:1459-1473.
149. Furuhata T., Yamamoto K. Forensic odontology 1967, Thomas, Sprinfield.
150. Indriati E. Historical perspectives on forensic anthropology in Indonesia. Handbook of forensic anthropology 2009, 115-125. Left Coast Press, California. 2009th ed. S. Blau, D.H. Ubelaker (Eds.).
151. Iscan M.Y. Forensic anthropology of sex and body size. Forensic Sci Int 2005, 147:107-112.
152. Puech P., Puech B., Tichy G. Identification of the cranium of WA Mozart. Forensic Sci Int 1989, 41:101-110.
153. Ross A.H. Use of digital imaging in the identification of fragmentary human skeletal remains: a case from the Republic of Panama. Forensic Sci Commun 2004, 6:4.
154. Teixeira W.R.G. The Mengele report. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1985, 6:279-283.
155. Kamijo Y., Sakai K. Basic study on superimposition with application of roentgencephalometry. Report II: Postural relationship between soft and hard tissues of the human head and face, a study of special camera for superimposition. Nat Res Institute Police Sci Rep 1970, 23:10-17.