Measurement of eyeball protrusion and its application in facial reconstruction

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 12-16

  Wilkinson, Caroline M ^a   Mautner, Sophie A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye; Facial reconstruction; Forensic science; Orbit

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CORNEA; EYE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORBIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORY;

EID: 0037229023     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1520/jfs2002053     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gatliffe BP. Facial sculpture on the skull for identification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1984;5(4):327-32.
2. Helmer R, Rohricht S, Petersen D, Mohr F. Assessment of the reliability of facial reconstruction. In: Iscan MY, Helmer RP, eds. Forensic analysis of the skull. Cpt 17, Wiley Liss Publications, New York. 1993; 229-47.
3. Prag J, Neave RAH. Making faces. London: British Museum Press 1997;12-40.
4. Taylor KT. Forensic art and illustration. CRC Press, New York. 2001.
5. Wilkinson CM, Neave RAH. Skull re-assembly and the implications for forensic facial reconstruction. Sci Justice 2001;41(3):5-6.
6. Stadtmuller F. Zur beurteilung der plastischen rekonstruktionsmethode der physiognomie auf dem scadel. J Morphologie und Anthropologie 1922;22:337-72.
7. Haglund WD, Reay DT. Use of facial approximation in identification of Green River Serial Murder Victims. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1991; 12(2):132-42.
8. Stephan C, Henneberg M. Building faces from dry skulls-are they recognized above chance rates? J Forensic Sci 2001;46(3):432-40.
9. Wilder HH. The physiognomy of the Indians of Southern New England. Am Anthropol 1912;14(3):415-35.
10. Snow CC, Gatliff BP, McWilliams KR. Reconstruction of facial features from the skull. An evaluation of its usefulness in forensic anthropology. Am J Physical Anthropol 1970;33:221-8.
11. Gerasimov MM. The face finder. (Translated from the German by AH Brodrick). London: Hutchinson. 1971.
12. Fedosyutkin BA, Nainys JV. The relationship of skull morphology to facial features. In: Iscan MY, Helmer RP, editors. Forensic analysis of the skull-craniofacial analysis, reconstruction and identification. Chapter 15 New York: Wiley-Liss. 1993.
13. Krogman WM, Iscan MY. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd Edition. C.C. Thomas Publishers, Illinois, 1986.
14. George RM. Anatomical and artistic guidelines for forensic facial reconstruction. Forensic analysis of the Skull. Wiley Liss Inc.; 1993; 215-27.
15. Hoffman BE, McConathy DA, Coward M, Saddler L. Relationship between the piriform aperture and interalar nasal widths in adult males. J Forensic Sci 1991;36(4):1152-61.
16. Latta GH, Weaver JR, Conkin JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthetic Dentistry 1991;65(2):250-4.
17. Stewart TD. The points of attachment of the palpebral ligaments-their use in facial reconstruction on the skull. J Forensic Sci 1983;28(4): 858-63.
18. Angel JL. Restoration of head and face for identification. Proceedings of Meetings of American Academy of Forensic Science St. Louis, Missouri. 1978.
19. Gatcliff BP, Snow CC. From skull to visage. J Biocomm 1979;6(2): 27-30.
20. Wolff's anatomy of the eye and orbit. 8th edition. Eds: Bron AJ, Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ. Chapman & Hall Medical, London. 1997.
21. Imai K, Tajima S. Measurement of normal eyeball position and its application for evaluation of exophthalmos in craniofacial synostosis. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1993;92:588-92.
22. Ozgen A, Aydingoz U. Normative measurements of orbital structures using MRI. J Computer Assisted Tomography 2000;24(3):493-6.
23. Tian S, Yasuhiro N, Isberg B, Lennerstrand G. MRI measurements of normal extraocular muscles and other orbital structures. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:393-404.
24. Hotsubo M, Ohba M, Ogasawara K, Kii T, Nakagawa T. Morphometry of normal orbit. Jap J Clin Ophthalmol 1994;48(5):839-42.
25. Neville W. Facial reconstruction. www.forensicartist.com/reconstruction.html. 1999.
26. Stewart TD. Essentials of forensic anthropology. C.C. Thomas Publications, Springfield, 1979.
27. Aulsebrook WA, Iscan MY, Slabbert JH, Becker P. Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification-a survey. Forensic Sci Inter 1995;75(2-3):101-20.
28. Gray's anatomy. 36th Ed. Williams PL, Warwick R, editors. Churchill Livingstone, London. 1980.
29. Stenstrom S. Untersuchungen uber die variation und kovariation der optischen elemente des menschilichen auges. Acta ophthalmol 1946;suppl 26;1-103.
30. Gerasimov MM. The reconstruction of the face from the basic structure of the skull. 1975; Translation by Tshernezky W. Unpublished work.
31. Nelson LA, Michael SD. The application of volume deformation to three dimensional facial reconstruction-a comparison with previous techniques. Forensic Sci Inter 1998;94(3):167-81.
32. Neave RAH. Age changes to the face in adulthood. In: Craniofacial identification in forensic medicine. Clement JG and Ranson DL. Cpt 17. Arnold Publications, 1998.
33. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Colombo A, Schmitz JH, Serrao G. Morphometry of the orbital region: a soft tissue study from adolescence to midadulthood. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2001;108(2):285-92.
34. Furuta M. Measurement of orbital volume by computed tomographyespecially on the growth of the orbit. Jap J Ophthalmol 2001;45(6): 600-6.
35. Farkas LG, Posnick JC, Hreczko TM, Pron GE. Growth patterns in the orbital region: a morphometric study. 1992;29(4):315-8.
36. Rogers AW. Textbook of anatomy. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone. 1992.