Erratum to "Benchmarking the sustainability performance of the Brazilian non-GM and GM soybean meal chains: An indicator-based approach" [Food Policy, 55, (2015), 22-32] doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.05.006;Benchmarking the sustainability performance of the Brazilian non-GM and GM soybean meal chains: An indicator-based approach

Food Policy

Volumn 55, Issue , 2015, Pages 22-32

  Gaitán Cremaschi, Daniel ^a   Kamali, Farahnaz Pashaei ^a   van Evert, Frits K ^a   Meuwissen, Miranda P M ^a   Oude Lansink, Alfons G J M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Externality; Soybean meal chain; Sustainability performance; Total Factor Productivity; Total Price Recovery

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL TRADE; BENCHMARKING; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; PROFITABILITY; SOYBEAN; SUSTAINABILITY; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; TRADE FLOW;

BRAZIL;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 84931274635     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.09.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (52)

1. Associação dos Produtores de Soja do Brasil (Aprosoja), 2014. Mato Grosso, Brazil: On the road to sustainability. << (retrieved in January 2014). http://aprosojabrasil.com.br/2014/.
2. Ayres, R.U., van der Berg, J.C.J.M., Gowdy, J.M., 1998. Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability, Discussion Paper IT 98-103/3. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
3. Barbier E.B., Burgess J.C., Folke C. Paradise Lost? - The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity 1994, Earthscan, London.
4. Barnes A.P. Publicly-funded UK agricultural R&D and 'social' total factor productivity. Agri. Econom. 2002, 27:65-74.
5. Barnes, A.P., McVittie, A., 2006. Measuring the sustainability of the UK food chain. Scotland's Rural College, Land Economy & Environment Research Group. Land Economic Working Paper Series Issue 11, Number 18. << (retrieved in January 2015). http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/srlewp/46003.html.
6. Barnett V., Payne R., Steiner R. Agricultural Sustainability: Economic, Environmental and Statistical Considerations 1995, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
7. Barona E., Ramankutty N., Hyman G., Coomes O.T. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5:024002.
8. Bonny S. Herbicide tolerant transgenic soybean over 15 years of cultivation: pesticide use, weed resistance, and some economic issues. The case of the USA. Sustainability 2011, 3:1302-1322.
9. Bruyn S., Korteland M., Markowska A., Davidson M., De Jong F., Bles M., Sevenster M. Shadow Prices Handbook: Valuation and weighting of emissions and environmental impacts Delft 2010, CE Delft, The Netherlands.
10. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
11. Csathó P., Sisák I., Radimszky L., Lushaj S., Spiegel H., Nikolova M.T., Nikolov N., ČErmák P., Klir J., Astover A., Karklins A., Lazauskas S., Kopiński J., Hera C., Dumitru E., Manojlovic M., Bogdanović D., Torma S., Leskošek M., Khristenko A. Agriculture as a source of phosphorus causing eutrophication in Central and Eastern Europe. Soil Use Manag. 2007, 23:36-56. 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00109.x.
12. Domingo J.L. Human health effects of Genetically Modified (GM) Plants: risk and perception, human and ecological risk assessment. Int. J. 2011, 17(3):535-537. 10.1080/10807039.2011.571065.
13. Ecoinvent, 2007. Ecoinvent Data v2.0 Final Reports Ecoinvent 2007. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
14. Ehui, S.K., Spencer, D.S.C., 1992. A general approach for evaluating the economic viability and sustainability of tropical cropping systems. In: Bellamy, M., Greenshields, B. (Eds.), Issues in Agricultural Development: Sustainability and Cooperation. IAAE Occasional Paper No. 6, Dartmouth Publishing Co., Aldershot, UK, pp. 110-119.
15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2012. Guidelines for slaughtering meat cutting and further processing. FAO. Available: <<. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/T0279E/T0279E05.htm.
16. Fearnside P.M. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment. Environ. Conserv. 2001, 28(1):23-38.
17. Flaskerud G. Brazil's Soyben Production and Impact 2003, North Dakota State University, USA.
18. Franke, A.C., Breukers, M.L.H., Broer, W., Bunte, F., Dolstra, O., D'Engelbronner-Kolff, F.M., Lotz, L.A.P., van Monfort, J., Nikoloyuk, J., Rutten, M.M., Smulders, M.J.M., van de Wiel, C.C.M., van Zijl, M., 2011. Sustainability of current GM crop cultivation. Review of people, planet, profit effects of agricultural production of GM crops, based on the cases of soybean, maize and cotton. Plant Research International, Wageningen UR, Report 386.
19. Gaitán-Cremaschi, D., Meuwissen, M.P.M., Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., Jansen, D.M., van Evert, F.K., Bosch, R., van de Pol, M.A., 2014. Novel Index Approach for Measuring Biomass Sustainability. Issue paper for the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) workshop on "Sustainable Biomass Drives the Next Bio-economy". OECD, Paris. June 10-11, 2014.
20. Garrett R.D., Rueda X., Lambin E.F. Sustainability Globalization's unexpected impact on soybean production in South America: linkages between preferences for non-genetically modified crops, eco-certifications, and land use. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8. 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044055.
21. Glendining M.J., Dailey A.G., Williams A.G., van Evert F.K., Goulding K.W.T., Whitmore A.P. Is it possible to increase the sustainability of arable and ruminant agriculture by reducing inputs?. Agric. Syst. 2009, 99:117-125.
22. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 2011. Sustainability reporting guidelines on economic, environmental and social performance, Global Reporting Initiative, Boston.
23. Hungria, M., José Campo, R., Carvalho Mendes, I., 2001. Fixação biológica do nitrogênio na cultura da soja. Circular Técnica n.35. Embrapa Soja, Londrina.
24. Huppes G., Ishikawa M., Harmelen T., Korenrompa R., Deutekomb C., Ligthart T., Leeuwenc S., Gijlswijk R. The price of toxicity. Methodology for the assessment of shadow prices for human toxicity, ecotoxicity and abiotic depletion. Quantified Eco-Efficiency 2007, 105-125. Springer, Netherlands.
25. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA), 2013. Projeto do Monitoramento do Desmatamento dos Biomas Brasileiros por Satélite - PMDBBS. << (retrieved in November 2013). http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/monitorabiomas/.
26. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), 2013. Brazil Instituto Brasileiro de Geografi a e Estatística (IBGE). << (retrieved in October 2013). http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/.
27. IPCC, 2006. Generic Methodologies Applicable to Multiple Land Use Categories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
28. Jaguaribe Pontes H.L., Telles do Carmo B.B., Vieira Porto A.J. Problemas logísticos na exportação brasileira da soja em grão. Revista EletrÔnica Sistemas & Gestão 2009, 4(2):155-181.
29. Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., Tette, J., 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139: Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY.
30. Leach A.W., Mumford J.D. Pesticide environmental accounting: a method for assessing the external costs of individual pesticide applications. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151:139-147. 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.02.019.
31. Lynam J.K., Herdt R.W. Sense and sustainability: sustainability as an objective in international agricultural research. Agri. Econom. 1989, 3:381-398.
32. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries of Argentina (MAGP); Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), 2012. Comparative study of genetically modified and conventional soybean cultivation in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Technical Coordinators: Rocha, P., Villalobos, V.M., San Jose, CR, IICA.
33. Meyer, D.E., Cederberg, C., 2010. Pesticide use and glyphosate-resistant weeds - a case study of Brazilian soybean production. The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology (SIK).
34. Middelaar V.C.E., Berentsen P.B.M., Dolman M.A., Boer D.I.J.M. Eco-efficiency in the production chain of the Dutch semi-hard cheese. Livestock Sci. 2011, 139:91-99.
35. Nordhaus W.D. The challenge of global warming: economic models and environmental policy. Edited by Yale University 2007, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut USA.
36. Ortega, E., Cavalett, O., Bonifácio, R., 2004. Expanded emergy analysis of soybean production in Brazil. Paper read at IV Biennial International Workshop Advances in Energy Studies, June 16-19, 2004, at Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
37. Pashaei Kamali, F., Meuwissen, M.P.M., de Boer, I.J.M., Moreira, A., Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., 2014. Sustainability Evaluation of Selected Latin America- European Union Soy Chains. Working Paper. Business Economics Group, Wageningen University.
38. Petkova, E., Larson, A., Pacheco, P. (Eds.), 2011. Gobernanza forestal y REDD+: Desafíos para las políticas y mercados en América Latina, Cifor, 2011.
39. Pimentel D., Marklein A., Toth M., Karpoff M., Paul G., McCormack R., Kyriazis J., Krueger T. Food versus biofuels: environmental and economic costs. Human Ecol. 2009, 37(1):1-12.
40. Praneetvatakul S., Schreinemachers P., Pananurak P., Tipraqsa P. Pesticides, external costs and policy options for Thai agriculture. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 27:103-113.
41. Pretty J.N., Brett C., Gee D., Hine R.E., Mason C.F., Morison J.I.L., Raven H., Rayment M.D., van der Bijl G. An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture. Agri. Syst. 2000, 65(2):113-136. 10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00031-7.
42. Pretty J., Brett C., Gee D., Hine R., Mason C., Morison J., Rayment M., Van Der Bijl G., Dobbs.T. Policy challenges and priorities for internalizing the externalities of modern agriculture. J. Environ. Planning Manage. 2001, 44(2):263-283. 10.1080/09640560123782.
43. Salin, D., 2013. Soybean Transportation Guide: Brazil, May 2013. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. << (retrieved in October 2013). http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5098677.
44. Sundkvist Å., Milestad R., Jansson A. On the importance of tightening feedback loops for sustainable development of food systems. Food Policy 2005, 30:224-239.
45. The Dutch Soy Coalition, 2008. Soy - big business, big responsibility: Addressing the social- and environmental impact of the soy value chain. The Dutch Soy Coalition. << (retrieved in November 2013). http://%20www.bothends.org/.
46. The World Bank, 2014. Soybean meal and oil - monthly price; volatility. << (retrieved in January 2014). http://www.quandl.com/WORLDBANK/WLD_SOYBEAN_MEAL-Soybean-meal-Price-mt.
47. Tol R.S.J. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 2005, 33(16):2064-2074. 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.002.
48. Tol R.S.J. The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes. Econ. Open-Access Open-Assess. E-J. 2008, 2:1-24.
49. Van der Ploeg, S., De Groot, R.S., Wang, Y., 2010. The TEEB Valuation Database: overview of structure, data and results. Foundation for Sustainable Development, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
50. van der Werf H.M.G. Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1996, 60(2-3):81-96.
51. Willaarts, B., Niemeyer, I., Garrido, A., 2013. Water Observatory-Botín Foundation and Research Centre for the Management of Agricultural and Environmental Risks (CEIGRAM), Technical University of Madrid, Spain. Retrieved in November 2013 from: <<. http://www.fundacionbotin.org/.
52. WWF, 2003. Sustainability assessment of export-led growth in soy production in Brazil. WWF-Brazil, 83 p.