Kinetic model selection and the Hill model in geochemistry

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 2545-2558

  Turner, B D ^a   Henley, B J ^a   Sleap, S B ^a   Sloan, S W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adsorption; AIC; Hill model; Kinetics; Model selection; Pseudo second order

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ENZYME KINETICS; GEOCHEMISTRY; KINETICS; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO); RATE CONSTANTS; SORPTION;

AIC; AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION; BAYESIAN INFORMATION CRITERION; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; MODEL SELECTION; PSEUDO SECOND ORDER; PSEUDO-SECOND ORDER MODEL; PSEUDO-SECOND ORDER RATES;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

ADSORPTION; AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION; ALGORITHM; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; GEOCHEMISTRY; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; REACTION KINETICS;

EID: 84931259935     PISSN: 17351472     EISSN: 17352630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-014-0662-4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:716–723
2. Asci Y, Acikel U, Acikel YS (2012) Equilibrium, hysteresis and kinetics of cadmium desorption from sodium-feldspar using rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Environ Technol 33(16):1857–1868
3. AskelÖf P, Korsfeldt M, Mannervik B (1976) Error structure of enzyme kinetic experiments. Eur J Biochem 69(1):61–67. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10858.x
4. Atukeren E (2010) The relationship between the F-test and the Schwarz criterion: implications for Granger-causality tests. Econ Bull 30(1):494–499
5. Barcroft J, Camis M (1909) The dissociation curve of blood. J Physiol 39:118–142
6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
7. Chien SH, Clayton WR (1980) Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:265–268
8. Chowdhury S, Das P (2011) Linear and non-linear regression analyses for binary sorpotion kinetics of methylene blue and safranin onto preheated rice husk. Bioremediat J 15:99–108
9. Diaz-Nava C, Olguin MT, Solache-Rios M, Alarcon-Herrera MT, Aguilar-Elguezabal A (2008) Effects of preparation and experimental conditions on removal of phenol by surfactant-modified zeolites. Environ Technol 29:1229–1239
10. Dimovic SD, Smiciklas ID, Sljivic-Ivanovic MZ, Plecas IB, Slavkovic-Beskoski L (2011) The effect of process parameters on kinetics and mechanisms of Co2 + removal by bone char. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 46:1558–1569
11. El-Khaiary MI, Malash GF, Ho Y-S (2010) On the use of linearized pseudo-second-order kinetic equations for modeling adsorption systems. Desalination 257(1–3):93–101
12. Fan X, Parker DJ, Smith MD (2003) Adsorption kinetics of fluoride on low cost materials. Water Res 37:4929–4937
13. Foubert I, Vanrolleghem PA, Vanhoutte B, Dewettinck K (2002) Dynamic mathematical model of the crystallization kinetics of fats. Food Res Int 35(10):945–956. doi:10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00157-6
14. Giraldo J, Vivas NM, Vila E, Badia A (2002) Assessing the (a)symmetry of concentration-effect curves: empirical versus mechanistic models. Pharmacol Ther 95(1):21–45. doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(02)00223-1
15. Gottschalk PG, Dunn Jr (2005) The five-parameter logistic: a characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic. Anal Biochem 343(1):54–65. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.035
16. Goutelle S, Maurin M, Rougier F, Barbaut X, Bourguignon L, Ducher M, Maire P (2008) The Hill equation: a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 22:633–648
17. Hannan EJ, Quinn BG (1979) The determination of the order of an autoregression. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 41(2):190–195. doi:10.2307/2985032
18. Havlin JL, Westfall DG, Olsen SR (1985) Mathematical-models for potassium release kinetics in calcareous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:371–376
19. Hill AV (1910) The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J Physiol 40:4–7
20. Ho Y-S (2004) Selection of optimum sorption isotherm. Carbon 42(10):2115–2116. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.019
21. Ho YS (2006) Second-order kinetic model for the sorption of cadmium onto tree fern: a comparison of linear and non-linear methods. Water Res 40:110–125
22. Ho YS, McKay G (1998a) Comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Process Saf Environ Protect Trans Inst Chem Eng Part B 76(4):332–340
23. Ho YS, McKay G (1998b) The kinetics of sorption of basic dyes from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. Can J Chem Eng 76(4):822–827
24. Ho YS, Ng JCY, McKay G (2000) Kinetics of pollutant sorption by biosorbents. Rev Sep Purifi Methods 29:189–232
25. Holford NHG, Sheiner LB (1981) Understanding dose-effect relationships—clinical-application of pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic models. Clin Pharmacokinet 6:429–453
26. Igwe JC, Abia AA (2007) Adsorption kinetics and intraparticulate diffusivities for bioremediation of Co (II), Fe (II) and Cu (II) ions from waste water using modified and unmodified maize cob. Int J Phys Sci 2:119–127
27. Jeffreys H (1939) Theory of probability. Oxford University Press, New York
28. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19(2):101–108. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013
29. Kass RE (1993) Bayes factors in practice. J R Stat Soc Ser D 42(5):551–560. doi:10.2307/2348679
30. Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430):773–795. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
31. Khinkis LA, Levasseur L, Faessel H, Greco WR (2003) Optimal design for estimating parameters of the 4-parameter hill model. Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med 1:363–377
32. Kumar KV, Sivanesan S (2006a) Linear and non-linear regression analysis for the sorption kinetics of methylene blue onto activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 137:1538–1544
33. Kumar KV, Sivanesan S (2006b) Selection of optimum sorption kinetics: comparison of linear and non-linear method. J Hazard Mater 134:277–279
34. Leyva-Ramos R, Rivera-Utrilla J, Medellin-Castillo NA, Sanchez-Polo M (2010) Kinetic modeling of fluoride adsorption from aqueous solution onto bone char. Chem Eng J 158:458–467
35. Low MJD (1960) Kinetics of chemisorption of gases on solids. Chem Rev 60:267–312
36. McKay G, Poots VJP (1980) Kinetics and diffusion-processes in color removal from effluent using wood as an adsorbent. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 30:279–292
37. McLintock IS (1967) The Elovich equation in chemisorption kinetics. Nature 216(5121):1204–1205
38. Mishra DK, Dolan KD, Yang L (2011) Bootstrap confidence intervals for the kinetic parameters of degradation of anthocyanins in grape pomace. J Food Process Eng 34(4):1220–1233. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4530.2009.00425.x
39. Motlagh MB (2012) Kinetics and mechanism of copper release from selected agricultural calcareous soils of northern Iran. Soil Res 50:312–319
40. Motulsky H, Christopoulos A (eds) (2004) Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression. A practical guide to curve fitting. Oxford University Press, New York
41. Motulsky HJ, Ransnas LA (1987) Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review. FASEB J 1(5):365–374
42. Pavlatou A, Polyzopoulos NA (1988) The role of diffusion in the kinetics of phosphate desorption—the relevance of the Elovich equation. J Soil Sci 39:425–436
43. Perez-Marin AB, Zapata VM, Ortuno JF, Aguilar M, Saez J, Llorens M (2007) Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto orange waste. J Hazard Mater 139:122–131
44. Plummer LN, Wigley TML, Parkhurst DL (1978) The kinetics of calcite dissolution in CO 2 -water systems at 5 degrees to 60 degrees C and 0.0 to 1.0 atm CO 2. Am J Sci 278(2):179–216. doi:10.2475/ajs.278.2.179
45. Qian G, Field C (2002) Law of iterated logarithm and consistent model selection criterion in logistic regression. Stat Prob Lett 56 (1):101–112. doi:10.1016/S0167-7152(01)00191-2
46. Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). Sociol Methodol 25:111–196
47. Robinson T, McMullan G, Marchant R, Nigam P (2001) Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour Technol 77(3):247–255. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8
48. Roginsky S. Z., Zeldovich J (1943). Acta Physicochim USSR (1):554
49. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. (2):461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
50. Sleap SB, Turner BD, Krabbenhoft K, Sloan SW (2013) Effects of pCO(2) on the removal of fluoride from wastewater by calcite. J Environ Eng 139(8):1053–1061
51. Smadbeck P, Kaznessis Y (2012) Stochastic model reduction using a modified Hill-type kinetic rate law. J Chem Phys 137(23):34109
52. Stone M (2005) Akaike’s Criteria. In: Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a09001
53. Sun Q, McDonald LM Jr, Skousen JG (2000) Effects of armouring on limestone neutralization of AMD. In: Proceedngs of the 2000 West Virginia surface mine drainage task force symposium, Morgantown, WV
54. Wagenmakers E-J (2007) A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychon Bull Rev 14(5):779–804. doi:10.3758/bf03194105
55. Wagenmakers E-J, Farrell S (2004) AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon Bull Rev 11(1):192–196. doi:10.3758/bf03206482
56. Weber J, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. J Sanitary Eng Div Proceed Am Soc Civil Eng 89:31–59
57. Wen DH, Ho YS, Tang XY (2006) Comparative sorption kinetic studies of ammonium onto zeolite. J Hazard Mater 133(1–3):252–256. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.020