Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: A naturalistic approach

Tobacco Control

Volumn 24, Issue E1, 2015, Pages e39-e44

  Gallopel Morvan, Karine ^a   Moodie, Crawford ^b   Eker, Figen ^c   Beguinot, Emmanuelle ^c   Martinet, Yves ^d  

^a EHESP SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^c Universitaire and University ^*  (France)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; CITY; DRUG PACKAGING; EMOTION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; MALE; PACKAGING; PERCEPTION; PLEASURE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TASTE; TOBACCO; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; AWARENESS; CITIES; DRUG PACKAGING; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTION; PLEASURE; PRODUCT LABELING; PRODUCT PACKAGING; QUESTIONNAIRES; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TASTE; TOBACCO; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930947540     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051513     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beck F, Guignard R, Richard J-B, et al. Increasing trends in smoking in France: Main results of the French Health Barometer, France 2010. Bull Epidémiol Hebdomadaire 2011;20-21:230-3.
2. Hill C. Epidémiologie du tabagisme. Rev Prat 2012;62:1-5.
3. Legifrance. Loi n°91-32 du 10 janvier 1991 relative à la lutte contre le tabagisme et l'alcoolisme. 1991. http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do? cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000344577&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id (accessed 21 Apr 2014).
4. World Health Organisation. Elaboration of guidelines for implementation of Article 11 of the Convention. Third session of the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Durban, South Africa, 17-22 November 2008. http://www.who.int/fctc/guidelines/article_11.pdf (accessed 18 Dec 2013).
5. Journal du Dimanche. Paquets de cigarettes neutres: Cahuzac est contre, Touraine est pour, 25 October 2012. http://www.lejdd.fr/Societe/Sante/Actualite/ Cahuzac-oppose-au-paquet-de-cigarettes-neutre-contrairement-a-Touraine-571442 (accessed 18 Dec 2013).
6. Moodie C, Stead M, Bauld L, et al. Plain tobacco packaging: a systematic review. Stirling: Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling, 2012.
7. Hammond D. "Plain packaging" regulations for tobacco products: the impact of standardizing the color and design of cigarette packs. Salud Pública de México 2010;52:226-32.
8. Moodie C, Hastings GB, Mackintosh AM, et al. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: A pilot naturalistic study. Tob Control 2011;20:367-73.
9. Moodie C, Mackintosh AM. Young adult women smokers' perceptions of using plain cigarette packaging: A naturalistic approach. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002402.
10. Wakefield MA, Hayes L, Durkin S, et al. Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2013;3: e003175.
11. TNS Opinion and Social. Special Eurobarometer 385: attitudes of Europeans towards tobacco. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.
12. Young D, Yong HH, Borland R, et al. Trends in roll-your-own smoking: findings from the ITC four-country survey (2002-2008). J Environ Public Health 2012;2012:406283.
13. Park CW, MacInnis DJ, Priester J. Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. J Mark 2010;74:1-17.
14. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, et al. The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;86:1119-27.
15. European Commission. Directive of the European parliament and of the council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.
16. Gallopel-Morvan K, Gabriel P, Le Gall-Ely M, et al. The use of visual warnings in social marketing: the case of tobacco. J Bus Res 2011;64:7-11.
17. Lacoeuilhe J. L'attachement à la marque: proposition d'une échelle de mesure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing 2000;15:61-77.
18. Wakefield MA, Germain D, Durkin SJ. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study. Tob Control 2008;17:416-21.
19. McCool J, Webb L, Cameron LD, et al. Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: Will they make a difference to adolescents? Soc Sci Med 2011;74: 1269-73.
20. Germain D, Wakefield MA, Durkin SJ. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference. J Adol Health 2010;46:385-92.
21. Hammond D, Daniel S, White CM. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom. J Adol Health 2013;52:151-7.
22. Malr L, Krohmer H, Hoyer WD, et al. Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: the relative importance of the actual and the ideal Self. J Mark 2011;75:35-52.
23. Becker L, van Rompay TJL, Schiffersstein HNJ, et al. Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Qual Preference 2011;22:17-23.
24. Orth UR, Malkewitz K. Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. J Mark 2008;72:64-81.
25. Young D, Borland R, Hammond D, et al. Prevalence attributes of roll-your-own smokers in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl III):76-82.
26. Edwards R. Roll your own cigarettes are less natural and at least as harmful as factory rolled tobacco. Br Med J 2014;348:f7616.