The influence of lexical statistics on temporal lobe cortical dynamics during spoken word listening

Brain and Language

Volumn 147, Issue , 2015, Pages 66-75

  Cibelli, Emily S ^a   Leonard, Matthew K ^b   Johnson, Keith ^a   Chang, Edward F ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrocorticography (ECoG); Lexical statistics; Pseudowords; Temporal lobe; Word comprehension

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CELL POPULATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTRACELLULAR RECORDING; LINGUISTICS; NERVE CELL; PHONETICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME; WORD RECOGNITION; CYTOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTOR;

HUMANS; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84930940342     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bouchard K.E., Mesgarani N., Johnson K., Chang E.F. Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature 2013, 495(7441):327-332.
2. Brysbaert M., New B. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41(4):977-990.
3. Canolty R.T., Soltani M., Dalal S.S., Edwards E., Dronkers N.F., Nagarajan S.S., et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of word processing in the human brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2007, 1(1):185.
4. Crone N.E., Boatman D., Gordon B., Hao L. Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception. Clinical Neurophysiology 2001, 112(4):565-582.
5. Crone N.E., Sinai A., Korzeniewska A. High-frequency gamma oscillations and human brain mapping with electrocorticography. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 159:275-295.
6. Davis M.H., Gaskell M.G. A complementary systems account of word learning: Neural and behavioural evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364(1536):3773-3800.
7. De Vaan L., Schreuder R., Baayen R.H. Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon 2007, 2(1):1-24.
8. DeWitt I., Rauschecker J.P. Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109(8):E505-E514.
9. Dronkers N.F., Wilkins D.P. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 2004, 92(1):145-177.
10. Edwards E., Soltani M., Deouell L.Y., Berger M.S., Knight R.T. High gamma activity in response to deviant auditory stimuli recorded directly from human cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 94(6):4269-4280.
11. Flinker A., Chang E.F., Barbaro N.M., Berger M.S., Knight R.T. Sub-centimeter language organization in the human temporal lobe. Brain and Language 2011, 117(3):103-109.
12. Gow D.W. The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: A dual lexicon model of spoken language processing. Brain and Language 2012, 121(3):273-288.
13. Gow D.W., Keller C.J., Eskandar E., Meng N., Cash S.S. Parallel versus serial processing dependencies in the perisylvian speech network: A Granger analysis of intracranial EEG data. Brain and Language 2009, 110(1):43-48.
14. Heald S.L., Nusbaum H.C. Speech perception as an active cognitive process. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2014, 8:1-5.
15. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8(5):393-402.
16. King J.R., Dehaene S. Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: The temporal generalization method. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2014, 18(4):203-210.
17. Leonard M.K., Chang E.F. Dynamic speech representations in the human temporal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2014, 18(9):472-479.
18. Leonard M.K., Bouchard K.E., Tang C., Chang E.F. Dynamic encoding of speech sequence probability in human temporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2015, 10.1523/jneurosci.4100-14.2015.
19. Lerner Y., Honey Christopher J., Silbert L.J., Hasson U. Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31:2906-2915.
20. Lindsay S., Sedin L.M., Gaskell M.G. Acquiring novel words and their past tenses: Evidence from lexical effects on phonetic categorisation. Journal of Memory and Language 2012, 66(1):210-225.
21. Luce P.A., Large N.R. Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2001, 16(5-6):565-581.
22. Magnuson J.S., Dixon J.A., Tanenhaus M.K., Aslin R.N. The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science 2007, 31(1):133-156.
23. Mainy N., Jung J., Baciu M., Kahane P., Schoendorff B., Minotti L., et al. Cortical dynamics of word recognition. Human Brain Mapping 2008, 29(11):1215-1230.
24. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 1987, 25(1):71-102.
25. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. Lexical representation and process 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W.D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.).
26. Marslen-Wilson W., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1978, 10:29-63.
27. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18(1):1-86.
28. McDonald C.R., Thesen T., Carlson C., Blumberg M., Girard H.M., Trongnetrpunya A., et al. Multimodal imaging of repetition priming: Using fMRI, MEG, and intracranial EEG to reveal spatiotemporal profiles of word processing. Neuroimage 2010, 53(2):707-717.
29. Mechelli A., Gorno-Tempini M., Price C. Neuroimaging studies of word and pseudoword reading: Consistencies, inconsistencies, and limitations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(2):260-271.
30. Meunier F., Longtin C.M. Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 56(4):457-471.
31. Mirman D., Dixon J.A., Magnuson J.S. Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59(4):475-494.
32. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 1994, 52(3):189-234.
33. Okada K., Rong F., Venezia J., Matchin W., Hsieh I.H., Saberi K., et al. Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: Evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(10):2486-2495.
34. Prabhakaran R., Blumstein S.E., Myers E.B., Hutchison E., Britton B. An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(12):2209-2221.
35. Pylkkänen L., Stringfellow A., Marantz A. Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain and Language 2002, 81(1):666-678.
36. Raettig T., Kotz S.A. Auditory processing of different types of pseudo-words: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 39(3):1420-1428.
37. Scott S.K., Blank C.C., Rosen S., Wise R.J. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123(12):2400-2406.
38. Scott S.K., Wise R.J. The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition 2004, 92(1):13-45.
39. Tanji K., Suzuki K., Delorme A., Shamoto H., Nakasato N. High-frequency γ-band activity in the basal temporal cortex during picture-naming and lexical-decision tasks. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(13):3287-3293.
40. Toscano J.C., Anderson N.D., McMurray B. Reconsidering the role of temporal order in spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2013, 20(5):981-987.
41. Towle V.L., Yoon H.A., Castelle M., Edgar J.C., Biassou N.M., Frim D.M., et al. ECoG gamma activity during a language task: Differentiating expressive and receptive speech areas. Brain 2008, 131(8):2013-2027.
42. Turken U., Dronkers N.F. The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: Converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2011, 5:1-20.
43. Vaden, K. I., Halpin, H. R., & Hickok, G. S. (2009). Irvine phonotactic online dictionary, version 2.0 [data file].
44. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40(3):374-408.
45. Weide, R. (2007). The CMU pronouncing dictionary, release 0.7a. Carnegie Mellon University [data file].
46. Yuan J., Liberman M. Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 123(5):3878.